Influence of plaque characteristics by coronary computed tomography angiography on lesion-specific ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11516-1
Nadia Iraqi, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Damini Dey, Jawdat Abdulla
{"title":"Influence of plaque characteristics by coronary computed tomography angiography on lesion-specific ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nadia Iraqi, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Damini Dey, Jawdat Abdulla","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11516-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association between plaque characteristics and burden by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and ischemia determined by invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR), and whether the addition of plaque characteristics improves ischemia discrimination beyond coronary stenosis alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases, published between January 2005 and October 2024 were conducted to assess the relationship between quantitative and qualitative coronary plaque characteristics and invasive FFR. Pooled analyses were performed using weighted mean difference for plaque volumes with 95% confidence intervals and odds ratios for qualitative plaque findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 studies involving 4416 patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years and 71% male) with predominantly stable coronary artery disease were included. Data on 3923 lesions and 3520 vessels were pooled. Total plaque, non-calcified plaque, and percent aggregate plaque volumes, as well as percent plaque burden, were inversely associated with FFR at both per-lesion and per-vessel levels (all, p-values < 0.05). The presence of high-risk plaque characteristics, including low-attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, and spotty calcification, were more frequently observed in lesions and vessels with FFR ≤ 0.80 (all, p-values < 0.05). Among plaque volumes, the percent aggregate plaque volume consistently improved ischemia discrimination independently of stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTA-derived quantification of plaque volumes and identification of high-risk plaque characteristics are associated with ischemia and significantly enhance discrimination of ischemia-causing lesions independently of coronary stenosis severity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Plaque characteristics have been suggested as the missing link between coronary artery stenosis severity and ischemia. Findings High-risk plaque characteristics and larger coronary plaque volumes are associated with ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80). Clinical relevance The addition of CCTA-derived plaque assessment improved the discrimination of ischemia compared with stenosis evaluation alone. Combining coronary stenosis and plaque assessment may improve the non-invasive assessment of patients with coronary artery disease and gatekeeping to the catheterization laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"6271-6290"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11516-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the association between plaque characteristics and burden by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and ischemia determined by invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR), and whether the addition of plaque characteristics improves ischemia discrimination beyond coronary stenosis alone.

Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases, published between January 2005 and October 2024 were conducted to assess the relationship between quantitative and qualitative coronary plaque characteristics and invasive FFR. Pooled analyses were performed using weighted mean difference for plaque volumes with 95% confidence intervals and odds ratios for qualitative plaque findings.

Results: A total of 29 studies involving 4416 patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years and 71% male) with predominantly stable coronary artery disease were included. Data on 3923 lesions and 3520 vessels were pooled. Total plaque, non-calcified plaque, and percent aggregate plaque volumes, as well as percent plaque burden, were inversely associated with FFR at both per-lesion and per-vessel levels (all, p-values < 0.05). The presence of high-risk plaque characteristics, including low-attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, and spotty calcification, were more frequently observed in lesions and vessels with FFR ≤ 0.80 (all, p-values < 0.05). Among plaque volumes, the percent aggregate plaque volume consistently improved ischemia discrimination independently of stenosis.

Conclusion: CCTA-derived quantification of plaque volumes and identification of high-risk plaque characteristics are associated with ischemia and significantly enhance discrimination of ischemia-causing lesions independently of coronary stenosis severity.

Key points: Question Plaque characteristics have been suggested as the missing link between coronary artery stenosis severity and ischemia. Findings High-risk plaque characteristics and larger coronary plaque volumes are associated with ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80). Clinical relevance The addition of CCTA-derived plaque assessment improved the discrimination of ischemia compared with stenosis evaluation alone. Combining coronary stenosis and plaque assessment may improve the non-invasive assessment of patients with coronary artery disease and gatekeeping to the catheterization laboratory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

冠状动脉ct血管造影对病变特异性缺血斑块特征的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)的斑块特征和负荷与有创测量分数血流储备(FFR)测定的缺血之间的关系,以及斑块特征的加入是否能改善冠状动脉狭窄之外的缺血识别。方法:对2005年1月至2024年10月期间发表的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库的研究进行系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析,以评估定量和定性冠状动脉斑块特征与有创FFR之间的关系。采用斑块体积加权平均差,95%置信区间和定性斑块发现的优势比进行合并分析。结果:共纳入29项研究,涉及4416例患者(平均年龄63±9岁,71%为男性),主要为稳定型冠状动脉疾病。汇总了3923个病变和3520个血管的数据。斑块总量、非钙化斑块、斑块体积百分比以及斑块负荷百分比在每个病变和每个血管水平上均与FFR呈负相关(均为p值)。结论:ccta衍生的斑块体积量化和高风险斑块特征的识别与缺血相关,并显著增强了对缺血性病变的区分,而不依赖于冠状动脉狭窄的严重程度。斑块特征被认为是冠状动脉狭窄严重程度与缺血之间缺失的一环。发现高危斑块特征和较大的冠状动脉斑块体积与缺血相关(FFR≤0.80)。与单独的狭窄评估相比,ccta衍生斑块评估的加入提高了对缺血的识别。结合冠状动脉狭窄和斑块评估可以改善冠状动脉疾病患者的无创评估和导管实验室的把关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信