Assessment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with LI-RADS in the high-risk population: MRI diagnosis and postoperative survival.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ruofan Sheng, Beixuan Zheng, Yunfei Zhang, Chun Yang, Dong Wu, Jianjun Zhou, Mengsu Zeng
{"title":"Assessment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with LI-RADS in the high-risk population: MRI diagnosis and postoperative survival.","authors":"Ruofan Sheng, Beixuan Zheng, Yunfei Zhang, Chun Yang, Dong Wu, Jianjun Zhou, Mengsu Zeng","doi":"10.1186/s40644-025-00860-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The precise impact of LI-RADS-defined risk factors on the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the value of LI-RADS categories and features for iCCA diagnosis, focusing on the diagnostic and prognostic implications of LI-RADS-defined risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally 214 high risk patients, including 107 surgically-confirmed solitary iCCAs and 107 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) from two centers were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and MRI features based on LI-RADS v2018 were compared, and the performance of targetoid features for discriminating iCCA was evaluated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared across different pathologic diagnoses and LI-RADS categories. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors for RFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the LI-RADS defined high-risk patients, iCCAs differed from HCCs in MRI manifestation. The LR-M category enabled the accurate classification of most iCCAs (89/107, 83.2%), achieving high sensitivity (83.2%), specificity (85.1%), and accuracy (84.1%). The optimal diagnostic performance for iCCA was achieved when at least one targetoid appearance was required for LR-M categorization (AUC = 0.828). Although 26.2% iCCAs presented at least one major feature and 15.0% iCCAs were miscategorized as probably or definitely HCC, only one iCCA case was categorized as LR-5. RFS varied according to both pathologic diagnosis (P = 0.030) and LI-RADS category (P = 0.028), with LI-RADS category demonstrating an independent association with RFS (HR = 1.736, P = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In high-risk patients, iCCAs frequently exhibit HCC major features, leading to miscategorization as probable HCC. However, the LR-5 category remains highly specific for ruling out iCCA. Furthermore, in high-risk patients with solitary resected iCCA or HCC, LI-RADS category enables the prediction of postsurgical prognosis independently from pathological diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00860-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The precise impact of LI-RADS-defined risk factors on the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains unclear.

Objective: To assess the value of LI-RADS categories and features for iCCA diagnosis, focusing on the diagnostic and prognostic implications of LI-RADS-defined risk factors.

Methods: Totally 214 high risk patients, including 107 surgically-confirmed solitary iCCAs and 107 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) from two centers were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and MRI features based on LI-RADS v2018 were compared, and the performance of targetoid features for discriminating iCCA was evaluated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared across different pathologic diagnoses and LI-RADS categories. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors for RFS.

Results: In the LI-RADS defined high-risk patients, iCCAs differed from HCCs in MRI manifestation. The LR-M category enabled the accurate classification of most iCCAs (89/107, 83.2%), achieving high sensitivity (83.2%), specificity (85.1%), and accuracy (84.1%). The optimal diagnostic performance for iCCA was achieved when at least one targetoid appearance was required for LR-M categorization (AUC = 0.828). Although 26.2% iCCAs presented at least one major feature and 15.0% iCCAs were miscategorized as probably or definitely HCC, only one iCCA case was categorized as LR-5. RFS varied according to both pathologic diagnosis (P = 0.030) and LI-RADS category (P = 0.028), with LI-RADS category demonstrating an independent association with RFS (HR = 1.736, P = 0.033).

Conclusions: In high-risk patients, iCCAs frequently exhibit HCC major features, leading to miscategorization as probable HCC. However, the LR-5 category remains highly specific for ruling out iCCA. Furthermore, in high-risk patients with solitary resected iCCA or HCC, LI-RADS category enables the prediction of postsurgical prognosis independently from pathological diagnosis.

高危人群肝内胆管癌伴LI-RADS的评估:MRI诊断和术后生存。
背景:li - rad定义的危险因素对肝内胆管癌(iCCA)的诊断和预后的确切影响尚不清楚。目的:评估LI-RADS分类和特征对iCCA诊断的价值,重点关注LI-RADS定义的危险因素的诊断和预后意义。方法:回顾性分析214例高危患者,其中手术证实的单发iCCAs患者107例,肝细胞癌患者107例。比较基于LI-RADS v2018的临床和MRI特征,并评估靶样特征鉴别iCCA的性能。比较不同病理诊断和LI-RADS类别的无复发生存期(RFS)。采用多变量Cox分析确定RFS的独立危险因素。结果:在LI-RADS定义的高危患者中,icca与hcc在MRI表现上存在差异。LR-M分类使大多数iCCAs能够准确分类(89/107,83.2%),具有较高的敏感性(83.2%)、特异性(85.1%)和准确性(84.1%)。当LR-M分类至少需要一个目标样貌时,iCCA的最佳诊断性能达到(AUC = 0.828)。虽然26.2%的iCCA至少表现出一个主要特征,15.0%的iCCA被错误地归类为可能或肯定的HCC,但只有1例iCCA被归类为LR-5。RFS因病理诊断(P = 0.030)和LI-RADS分类(P = 0.028)而异,其中LI-RADS分类与RFS独立相关(HR = 1.736, P = 0.033)。结论:在高危患者中,iCCAs经常表现出HCC的主要特征,导致误诊为可能的HCC。然而,LR-5类别对于排除iCCA仍然是高度特异性的。此外,在单独切除iCCA或HCC的高危患者中,LI-RADS分类可以独立于病理诊断预测术后预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信