Polish adaptation and validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for PTSD and cPTSD according to ICD-11 in non-clinical and clinical samples.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Dorota Draczyńska, Łukasz Mokros, Agnieszka Nowakowska, Marta Anczewska
{"title":"Polish adaptation and validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for PTSD and cPTSD according to ICD-11 in non-clinical and clinical samples.","authors":"Dorota Draczyńska, Łukasz Mokros, Agnieszka Nowakowska, Marta Anczewska","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2468116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a validated measure supporting the diagnosis of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (cPTSD). It has been translated into 35 languages, also into Polish. Due to the lack of information in the literature about its validation, new Polish version has been re-adapted and validated in the Polish non-clinical and clinical samples of the present study.<b>Objective:</b> The study aimed (1) to adapt the ITQ for use in Polish, (2) to assess the construct validity of ICD-11 PTSD and cPTSD in the Polish ITQ, and (3) to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the Polish ITQ.<b>Method:</b> The study sample comprised of 452 adults: a non-clinical sample, <i>N</i> = 314, (completed the online version of the questionnaire) and a clinical sample, <i>N</i> = 138, (used a pen-and-paper version). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) were performed to assess the structure of the ITQ.<b>Results:</b> The CFA supported a two-factor second-order model as the best fit to the data. All factor loadings were statistically significant and reached a satisfactory level. Cronbach's alpha for ITQ (<i>α</i> = 0.887), PTSD (<i>α</i> = 0.810) and DSO (<i>α</i> = 0.875) were good. The LPA revealed four classes: (1) a cPTSD class with elevated PTSD and DSO symptoms; (2) a PTSD class with elevated PTSD symptoms but low scores on the DSO; (3) a DSO class with elevated DSO symptoms but low scores on the PTSD; and (4) a low symptom class with low scores on all symptoms.<b>Conclusion:</b> The amended Polish ITQ has good internal consistency and psychometric properties. The model is well fitted to differentiating PTSD/cPTSD diagnoses according to ICD-11 and is a reliable measure of support for the making of a PTSD/cPTSD diagnosis in the conduct of clinical interview.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2468116"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2468116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a validated measure supporting the diagnosis of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (cPTSD). It has been translated into 35 languages, also into Polish. Due to the lack of information in the literature about its validation, new Polish version has been re-adapted and validated in the Polish non-clinical and clinical samples of the present study.Objective: The study aimed (1) to adapt the ITQ for use in Polish, (2) to assess the construct validity of ICD-11 PTSD and cPTSD in the Polish ITQ, and (3) to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the Polish ITQ.Method: The study sample comprised of 452 adults: a non-clinical sample, N = 314, (completed the online version of the questionnaire) and a clinical sample, N = 138, (used a pen-and-paper version). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) were performed to assess the structure of the ITQ.Results: The CFA supported a two-factor second-order model as the best fit to the data. All factor loadings were statistically significant and reached a satisfactory level. Cronbach's alpha for ITQ (α = 0.887), PTSD (α = 0.810) and DSO (α = 0.875) were good. The LPA revealed four classes: (1) a cPTSD class with elevated PTSD and DSO symptoms; (2) a PTSD class with elevated PTSD symptoms but low scores on the DSO; (3) a DSO class with elevated DSO symptoms but low scores on the PTSD; and (4) a low symptom class with low scores on all symptoms.Conclusion: The amended Polish ITQ has good internal consistency and psychometric properties. The model is well fitted to differentiating PTSD/cPTSD diagnoses according to ICD-11 and is a reliable measure of support for the making of a PTSD/cPTSD diagnosis in the conduct of clinical interview.

根据ICD-11,在非临床和临床样本中对PTSD和cPTSD的国际创伤问卷(ITQ)进行调整和验证。
背景:国际创伤问卷(ITQ)是支持ICD-11创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(cPTSD)诊断的有效措施。它被翻译成35种语言,也被翻译成波兰语。由于文献中缺乏关于其有效性的信息,新的波兰语版本已在本研究的波兰非临床和临床样本中重新改编和验证。目的:本研究旨在(1)调整波兰语ITQ,(2)评估波兰语ITQ中ICD-11 PTSD和cPTSD的结构效度,(3)检验波兰语ITQ的收敛效度和判别效度。方法:研究样本由452名成年人组成,其中非临床样本314名(完成在线问卷)和临床样本138名(使用纸笔问卷)。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和潜在类分析(LCA)来评估ITQ的结构。结果:CFA支持两因素二阶模型作为数据的最佳拟合。所有因子负荷均具有统计学意义,达到了令人满意的水平。ITQ (α = 0.887)、PTSD (α = 0.810)和DSO (α = 0.875)的Cronbach's alpha均较好。LPA显示了四个等级:(1)cPTSD等级,PTSD和DSO症状升高;(2)一类PTSD患者PTSD症状升高,但DSO得分较低;(3) DSO类患者DSO症状升高,但PTSD得分较低;(4)低症状等级,所有症状得分都很低。结论:修正后的波兰ITQ量表具有良好的内在一致性和心理测量学性质。该模型可以很好地适用于根据ICD-11区分PTSD/cPTSD诊断,是在进行临床访谈时支持PTSD/cPTSD诊断的可靠措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信