Assessment of physical facilities and detection of post-mortem lesions in public abattoirs in selected districts of Wolaita zone, Ethiopia.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Melese Yilma Zaba, Asefa Asmare, Joseph P Cassidy, Stephen V Gordon
{"title":"Assessment of physical facilities and detection of post-mortem lesions in public abattoirs in selected districts of Wolaita zone, Ethiopia.","authors":"Melese Yilma Zaba, Asefa Asmare, Joseph P Cassidy, Stephen V Gordon","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04697-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participatory abattoir appraisals and observational analysis were conducted in selected local abattoirs in the Wolaita, Ethiopia with the aims of assessing (i) the physical facilities available in these abattoirs and (ii) the detection of post-mortem gross lesions upon routine meat inspection that may have been due to infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study surveyed public abattoirs to evaluate meat inspection services and facility standards. Gross lesions in slaughtered animals were categorized by consistency, prioritized using a scoring matrix, and analyzed for anatomical distribution. Concordance in prioritization was assessed with Kendall's W test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our investigation revealed that almost all public abattoirs surveyed had substandard physical facilities for conducting meat inspection services. According to statistics from the studied abattoirs, 26.6% of slaughtered animals exhibited at least one grossly visible lesion, of which 65% were considered by the local veterinary inspectorate to have potential animal or public health significance. Among the identified lesions, 10% were classified as having a 'soft' consistency (e.g., cystic or caseous/abscess), while 5% were categorized as 'hard' (e.g., fibrotic, firm, fibrous, or mineralized). The remaining 85% of lesions were uncategorized. Using a prioritization matrix scoring method, the overall mean proportional priority rank data indicated that 'mineralized/calcified' hard lesions were assigned the highest priority (0.67), followed by 'cystic' lesions (0.58). The evidence for group concordance in prioritization was moderate (W = 0.275; p = 0.019). Regarding anatomical distribution, the survey groups ranked gross lesions in the lungs and associated mediastinal and bronchial lymph nodes as the top priority (0.67). Lesions in the small intestine and mesenteric lymph nodes (0.33) were ranked second, followed by lesions in the hepatic lymph nodes (0.42). There was strong concordance in the overall mean ranking of these lesion sites within the survey groups (W = 0.518; p = 0.0001). Some of the gross lesions detected in this study may pose a potential zoonotic risk (e.g. tuberculosis).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights how infrastructural deficiencies and operational procedures in abattoirs can contribute to poor quality and potentially diseased meat entering the human food chain, features which need to be addressed locally to safeguard public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04697-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participatory abattoir appraisals and observational analysis were conducted in selected local abattoirs in the Wolaita, Ethiopia with the aims of assessing (i) the physical facilities available in these abattoirs and (ii) the detection of post-mortem gross lesions upon routine meat inspection that may have been due to infectious diseases.

Methods: Our study surveyed public abattoirs to evaluate meat inspection services and facility standards. Gross lesions in slaughtered animals were categorized by consistency, prioritized using a scoring matrix, and analyzed for anatomical distribution. Concordance in prioritization was assessed with Kendall's W test.

Results: Our investigation revealed that almost all public abattoirs surveyed had substandard physical facilities for conducting meat inspection services. According to statistics from the studied abattoirs, 26.6% of slaughtered animals exhibited at least one grossly visible lesion, of which 65% were considered by the local veterinary inspectorate to have potential animal or public health significance. Among the identified lesions, 10% were classified as having a 'soft' consistency (e.g., cystic or caseous/abscess), while 5% were categorized as 'hard' (e.g., fibrotic, firm, fibrous, or mineralized). The remaining 85% of lesions were uncategorized. Using a prioritization matrix scoring method, the overall mean proportional priority rank data indicated that 'mineralized/calcified' hard lesions were assigned the highest priority (0.67), followed by 'cystic' lesions (0.58). The evidence for group concordance in prioritization was moderate (W = 0.275; p = 0.019). Regarding anatomical distribution, the survey groups ranked gross lesions in the lungs and associated mediastinal and bronchial lymph nodes as the top priority (0.67). Lesions in the small intestine and mesenteric lymph nodes (0.33) were ranked second, followed by lesions in the hepatic lymph nodes (0.42). There was strong concordance in the overall mean ranking of these lesion sites within the survey groups (W = 0.518; p = 0.0001). Some of the gross lesions detected in this study may pose a potential zoonotic risk (e.g. tuberculosis).

Conclusions: This study highlights how infrastructural deficiencies and operational procedures in abattoirs can contribute to poor quality and potentially diseased meat entering the human food chain, features which need to be addressed locally to safeguard public health.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信