Nabil Fakih-Gomez, Shahriar Nazari, Fatemeh Azadi, Mohammad Reza Pourani, Paula Martin-Marfil
{"title":"Immunohistochemical Analysis of Nanofat Membrane, Solid PRF, and Stromal Vascular Fraction Gel.","authors":"Nabil Fakih-Gomez, Shahriar Nazari, Fatemeh Azadi, Mohammad Reza Pourani, Paula Martin-Marfil","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04798-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and nanofat have emerged as promising autologous biomaterials in tissue regeneration and facial rejuvenation. Both serve as vehicles for cellular growth factors that promote wound healing and tissue remodeling. This study aims to investigate the presence of endothelial and stem cell markers in nanofat membranes through immunohistochemical analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eleven patients (nine women, two men) with a mean age of 36.82 ± 5.79 were included in this case-series study. Tissue samples were obtained using a mixture of nanofat and injectable PRF, with two different concentration ratios (2:1 and 1:1), in addition to solid PRF and stromal vascular fraction (SVF) gel membrane for comparison. The samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde, processed into paraffin blocks, and sectioned (2-5 μm). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using markers CD31 (endothelial cells), CD34 (hematopoietic and adipose-derived stem cells, and endothelial cells), CD163 (macrophages), ERG (endothelial marker), S100 (adipocyte marker), and CD10 (adipose-derived stem cells). Histopathologic examination evaluated endothelial and stem cell presence as well as macrophage infiltration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathological analysis revealed fragmented adipose tissue with vascular proliferation, as well as platelet and fibrin deposition. Immunohistochemical staining showed the presence of endothelial markers (CD31: 36.82%, CD34: 22.73%, ERG: 19.09%) in the nanofat membrane, indicating vascularization. CD163 staining highlighted macrophages, although they were sparse in the nanofat membrane (<1% of cells). The SVF gel membrane exhibited substantial platelet aggregation but lacked evidence of cellular differentiation. CD34 staining confirmed the presence of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), though in lower-than-expected quantities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the presence of endothelial cells and limited macrophages within the nanofat membranes, suggesting potential for vascular neoformation and tissue remodeling. However, the lack of detection of significant adipose-derived stem cells highlights the need for more advanced immunohistochemical markers to fully evaluate regenerative potential. The nanofat membrane provides a viable scaffold for tissue regeneration, with further research needed to optimize protocols for enhanced clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04798-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and nanofat have emerged as promising autologous biomaterials in tissue regeneration and facial rejuvenation. Both serve as vehicles for cellular growth factors that promote wound healing and tissue remodeling. This study aims to investigate the presence of endothelial and stem cell markers in nanofat membranes through immunohistochemical analysis.
Materials and methods: Eleven patients (nine women, two men) with a mean age of 36.82 ± 5.79 were included in this case-series study. Tissue samples were obtained using a mixture of nanofat and injectable PRF, with two different concentration ratios (2:1 and 1:1), in addition to solid PRF and stromal vascular fraction (SVF) gel membrane for comparison. The samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde, processed into paraffin blocks, and sectioned (2-5 μm). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using markers CD31 (endothelial cells), CD34 (hematopoietic and adipose-derived stem cells, and endothelial cells), CD163 (macrophages), ERG (endothelial marker), S100 (adipocyte marker), and CD10 (adipose-derived stem cells). Histopathologic examination evaluated endothelial and stem cell presence as well as macrophage infiltration.
Results: Histopathological analysis revealed fragmented adipose tissue with vascular proliferation, as well as platelet and fibrin deposition. Immunohistochemical staining showed the presence of endothelial markers (CD31: 36.82%, CD34: 22.73%, ERG: 19.09%) in the nanofat membrane, indicating vascularization. CD163 staining highlighted macrophages, although they were sparse in the nanofat membrane (<1% of cells). The SVF gel membrane exhibited substantial platelet aggregation but lacked evidence of cellular differentiation. CD34 staining confirmed the presence of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), though in lower-than-expected quantities.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the presence of endothelial cells and limited macrophages within the nanofat membranes, suggesting potential for vascular neoformation and tissue remodeling. However, the lack of detection of significant adipose-derived stem cells highlights the need for more advanced immunohistochemical markers to fully evaluate regenerative potential. The nanofat membrane provides a viable scaffold for tissue regeneration, with further research needed to optimize protocols for enhanced clinical outcomes.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.