The effects of the use of whitening mouthwash after home bleaching on the color stability and surface hardness of enamel.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Iklima Mehmethanoglu, Ipek Cubukcu, Neslihan Celik, Pinar Gul
{"title":"The effects of the use of whitening mouthwash after home bleaching on the color stability and surface hardness of enamel.","authors":"Iklima Mehmethanoglu, Ipek Cubukcu, Neslihan Celik, Pinar Gul","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05787-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of whitening mouthwashes, both with and without hydrogen peroxide (HP), after at-home teeth whitening in preserving the achieved whiteness and assessing their impact on enamel surface hardness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred extracted human premolar teeth were divided into two groups, and home bleaching agents (Philips Zoom NiteWhite 22% Carbamide Peroxide, Ultradent Opalescence PF 16% Carbamide Peroxide) were applied to the groups. The teeth subjected to home bleaching were further divided into five subgroups, and each subgroup underwent a four-week cycle of application of a coloring agent and whitening mouthwash (Colgate Optic White (COW)(%2 HP), Rocs Black Edition (Rocs) (%1 HP), SPLAT Professional Bioactive gargle white Plus (SPLAT) (Ananas sativus fruit extract containing), Listerine Advanced White (Listerine) (Pyrophsphate containing), and distilled water (DW) (control)). Color and microhardness measurements were recorded at baseline, after home bleaching, and after treatment with whitening mouthwashes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with those treated with Opalescence PF, the samples treated with Zoom achieved a significantly greater degree of whitening (p < 0.001). When the effects of postwhitening mouthwash were evaluated (ΔE<sub>002</sub>), Listerine presented the lowest ΔE<sub>002</sub> value in both home bleaching groups, whereas the control group presented the highest ΔE<sub>002</sub> value. Both home-bleaching agents caused a significant increase in the initial WI<sub>D</sub> values (p < 0.05). After home-bleaching, the increased WI<sub>D</sub> values (WI<sub>D2</sub>) significantly decreased in all mouthwash groups following exposure to the staining and whitening mouthwash cycle (WI<sub>D3</sub>) (p < 0.05). The impact of home bleaching agents on microhardness was not significantly different (p = 0.151). When we examined the impact of whitening mouthwashes on microhardness, in the Zoom group, no statistically significant difference was observed in surface hardness (p > 0.05). However, in the Opalescence PF group, only the Listerine group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher concentrations of carbamide peroxide provide faster and more effective whitening. Whitening mouthwash containing HP and pyrophosphate is effective in maintaining tooth whiteness after home bleaching; however, its impact on enamel microhardness depends on the formulation. Notably, only Listerine in the Opalescence PF group significantly increased surface hardness. Given the drawbacks of HP, pyrophosphate-based mouthwash may serve as a safer alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05787-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of whitening mouthwashes, both with and without hydrogen peroxide (HP), after at-home teeth whitening in preserving the achieved whiteness and assessing their impact on enamel surface hardness.

Methods: One hundred extracted human premolar teeth were divided into two groups, and home bleaching agents (Philips Zoom NiteWhite 22% Carbamide Peroxide, Ultradent Opalescence PF 16% Carbamide Peroxide) were applied to the groups. The teeth subjected to home bleaching were further divided into five subgroups, and each subgroup underwent a four-week cycle of application of a coloring agent and whitening mouthwash (Colgate Optic White (COW)(%2 HP), Rocs Black Edition (Rocs) (%1 HP), SPLAT Professional Bioactive gargle white Plus (SPLAT) (Ananas sativus fruit extract containing), Listerine Advanced White (Listerine) (Pyrophsphate containing), and distilled water (DW) (control)). Color and microhardness measurements were recorded at baseline, after home bleaching, and after treatment with whitening mouthwashes.

Results: Compared with those treated with Opalescence PF, the samples treated with Zoom achieved a significantly greater degree of whitening (p < 0.001). When the effects of postwhitening mouthwash were evaluated (ΔE002), Listerine presented the lowest ΔE002 value in both home bleaching groups, whereas the control group presented the highest ΔE002 value. Both home-bleaching agents caused a significant increase in the initial WID values (p < 0.05). After home-bleaching, the increased WID values (WID2) significantly decreased in all mouthwash groups following exposure to the staining and whitening mouthwash cycle (WID3) (p < 0.05). The impact of home bleaching agents on microhardness was not significantly different (p = 0.151). When we examined the impact of whitening mouthwashes on microhardness, in the Zoom group, no statistically significant difference was observed in surface hardness (p > 0.05). However, in the Opalescence PF group, only the Listerine group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Higher concentrations of carbamide peroxide provide faster and more effective whitening. Whitening mouthwash containing HP and pyrophosphate is effective in maintaining tooth whiteness after home bleaching; however, its impact on enamel microhardness depends on the formulation. Notably, only Listerine in the Opalescence PF group significantly increased surface hardness. Given the drawbacks of HP, pyrophosphate-based mouthwash may serve as a safer alternative.

家用漂白后使用美白漱口水对牙釉质颜色稳定性和表面硬度的影响。
背景:评价家用牙齿美白后,含和不含双氧水(HP)的美白漱口水在保持牙齿白度方面的效果,并评估其对牙釉质表面硬度的影响。方法:将100颗拔除的人前磨牙分为两组,分别使用家用漂白剂(Philips Zoom NiteWhite 22%过氧化脲和Ultradent Opalescence PF 16%过氧化脲)。接受家庭漂白的牙齿进一步分为五个亚组,每个亚组进行为期四周的应用着色剂和美白漱口水的周期(高露洁光学白(%2 HP),罗氏黑色版(Rocs) (%1 HP), SPLAT专业生物活性含漱白(SPLAT)(含ana sativus水果提取物),李斯德林高级白(李斯德林)(含焦磷酸盐)和蒸馏水(DW)(对照))。在基线、家庭漂白和美白漱口水处理后,记录颜色和显微硬度测量。结果:与乳光PF处理的样品相比,Zoom处理的样品的美白程度明显更大(p 002),两组家庭漂白的李斯德林ΔE002值最低,而对照组的ΔE002值最高。两种家用漂白剂均导致初始WID值显著增加(p D值(WID2)),在暴露于染色和美白漱口水循环后,所有漱口水组的WID值(WID3)均显著降低(p 0.05)。然而,在Opalescence PF组中,只有李斯德林组有统计学意义的增加(p)。结论:较高浓度的过氧化脲能更快、更有效地美白。含HP和焦磷酸盐的美白漱口水能有效维持牙齿漂白后的白度;然而,其对牙釉质显微硬度的影响取决于配方。值得注意的是,只有乳白色PF组的李斯德林显著提高了表面硬度。鉴于HP的缺点,焦磷酸盐漱口水可能是一种更安全的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信