Glycemic Comparison Index (GCI): a retrospective analysis of its prognostic value in ICU patients with AMI and diabetes.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yingfang She, Chunfei Wang, Le Fu, Liang Luo, Yide Li
{"title":"Glycemic Comparison Index (GCI): a retrospective analysis of its prognostic value in ICU patients with AMI and diabetes.","authors":"Yingfang She, Chunfei Wang, Le Fu, Liang Luo, Yide Li","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01907-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has a significant impact on global health, especially among individuals with diabetes, emphasizing the need for specialized glycemic management. This study examines the glycemic comparison index (GCI), a novel prognostic tool designed for patients with AMI and diabetes, aiming to enhance glucose management in critical care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (version 2.2). The GCI was calculated by comparing mean blood glucose levels in the intensive care unit (ICU) to baseline glucose levels. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on their GCI scores. The primary outcome measured was one-year all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, ICU-free days, and hypoglycemic events. Statistical analyses included time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), cox proportional hazards models, generalized linear models (GLM), and restricted cubic spline analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient population comprised 622 individuals, with a mean age of 69.9 years and 64.6% male representation. The high GCI group exhibited the highest one-year mortality rate and fewer ICU-free days, while the low GCI group exhibited a higher incidence of hypoglycemia. Statistical analyses revealed that GCI was a significant predictor of one-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-3.24). Analysis using time-dependent ROC confirmed the consistent predictive accuracy of GCI for survival at 1, 6, and 12 months (area under the curve: 0.671, 0.670, and 0.634, respectively). Furthermore, GLM analysis indicated that a higher GCI was associated with fewer ICU-free days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher GCI values are associated with increased one-year mortality and fewer ICU-free days in patients with AMI and diabetes. In comparison, lower GCI values are correlated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia. The GCI demonstrates potential as a personalized prognostic tool, although further validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01907-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has a significant impact on global health, especially among individuals with diabetes, emphasizing the need for specialized glycemic management. This study examines the glycemic comparison index (GCI), a novel prognostic tool designed for patients with AMI and diabetes, aiming to enhance glucose management in critical care settings.

Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (version 2.2). The GCI was calculated by comparing mean blood glucose levels in the intensive care unit (ICU) to baseline glucose levels. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on their GCI scores. The primary outcome measured was one-year all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, ICU-free days, and hypoglycemic events. Statistical analyses included time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), cox proportional hazards models, generalized linear models (GLM), and restricted cubic spline analysis.

Results: The patient population comprised 622 individuals, with a mean age of 69.9 years and 64.6% male representation. The high GCI group exhibited the highest one-year mortality rate and fewer ICU-free days, while the low GCI group exhibited a higher incidence of hypoglycemia. Statistical analyses revealed that GCI was a significant predictor of one-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-3.24). Analysis using time-dependent ROC confirmed the consistent predictive accuracy of GCI for survival at 1, 6, and 12 months (area under the curve: 0.671, 0.670, and 0.634, respectively). Furthermore, GLM analysis indicated that a higher GCI was associated with fewer ICU-free days.

Conclusions: Higher GCI values are associated with increased one-year mortality and fewer ICU-free days in patients with AMI and diabetes. In comparison, lower GCI values are correlated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia. The GCI demonstrates potential as a personalized prognostic tool, although further validation is needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信