Evaluation of a patient decision aid for opportunistic salpingectomy and salpingectomy as sterilization method to prevent ovarian cancer.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Malou E Gelderblom, Charlotte Fisch, Jurgen M J Piek, Laura A M van Lieshout, Justine Briet, Lauren Bullens, Sjors F P J Coppus, Inge Ebisch, Alexandra A van Ginkel, Rafli van de Laar, Natascha de Lange, Marloes Maassen, Huy Ngo, Angele L M Oei, Brenda Pijlman, Brigitte Slangen, Regina The, Dineke Smedts, Caroline Vos, Joanna IntHout, Joanne A de Hullu, Rosella P M G Hermens
{"title":"Evaluation of a patient decision aid for opportunistic salpingectomy and salpingectomy as sterilization method to prevent ovarian cancer.","authors":"Malou E Gelderblom, Charlotte Fisch, Jurgen M J Piek, Laura A M van Lieshout, Justine Briet, Lauren Bullens, Sjors F P J Coppus, Inge Ebisch, Alexandra A van Ginkel, Rafli van de Laar, Natascha de Lange, Marloes Maassen, Huy Ngo, Angele L M Oei, Brenda Pijlman, Brigitte Slangen, Regina The, Dineke Smedts, Caroline Vos, Joanna IntHout, Joanne A de Hullu, Rosella P M G Hermens","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A patient decision aid on opportunistic salpingectomy and salpingectomy as a sterilization method has been developed to provide uniform counseling and reduce practice variation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the patient decision aid in daily clinical practice to ensure its effectiveness and usability, as well as its influence on the decision-making process and the decision of opportunistic salpingectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>As part of the STOPOVCA-implementation study, we conducted a multicenter observational study in 16 hospitals between July 2020 and February 2024. Patients who were eligible for opportunistic salpingectomy were invited to use the decision aid while they considered whether or not to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy. Digital questionnaires were used to evaluate the decision aid, the decision process, and patients' decisions 6-8 weeks post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>425 out of 542 patients participated in the questionnaire. A majority of these 425 patients received (N = 357; 84%) and used the decision aid (N = 347; 82%). Two thirds (N = 234; 67%) of those who used the decision aid stated that it increased their knowledge of opportunistic salpingectomy. Patients considered the decision aid a usable aid, allocating a score of 8.1 out of 10 and would recommend it to other patients facing the decision regarding opportunistic salpingectomy. Patients considered the extent to which they were involved in the decision-making process as high, and the decisional conflict low. The majority of patients who used the decision aid opted for opportunistic salpingectomy (N = 326; 95%). Main reasons for choosing opportunistic salpingectomy were the risk-reducing effect of ovarian cancer (N = 311; 90%) and the lack of functionality of the fallopian tubes after childbearing (N = 320; 92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient decision aid was used by a majority of patients who received it. The decision aid was regarded by patients as user-friendly, and it was recommended to be used in the decision-making process for opportunistic salpingectomy. Patients stated that the decision aid provides reliable information and increases patients' knowledge of opportunistic salpingectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A patient decision aid on opportunistic salpingectomy and salpingectomy as a sterilization method has been developed to provide uniform counseling and reduce practice variation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the patient decision aid in daily clinical practice to ensure its effectiveness and usability, as well as its influence on the decision-making process and the decision of opportunistic salpingectomy.

Material and methods: As part of the STOPOVCA-implementation study, we conducted a multicenter observational study in 16 hospitals between July 2020 and February 2024. Patients who were eligible for opportunistic salpingectomy were invited to use the decision aid while they considered whether or not to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy. Digital questionnaires were used to evaluate the decision aid, the decision process, and patients' decisions 6-8 weeks post-surgery.

Results: 425 out of 542 patients participated in the questionnaire. A majority of these 425 patients received (N = 357; 84%) and used the decision aid (N = 347; 82%). Two thirds (N = 234; 67%) of those who used the decision aid stated that it increased their knowledge of opportunistic salpingectomy. Patients considered the decision aid a usable aid, allocating a score of 8.1 out of 10 and would recommend it to other patients facing the decision regarding opportunistic salpingectomy. Patients considered the extent to which they were involved in the decision-making process as high, and the decisional conflict low. The majority of patients who used the decision aid opted for opportunistic salpingectomy (N = 326; 95%). Main reasons for choosing opportunistic salpingectomy were the risk-reducing effect of ovarian cancer (N = 311; 90%) and the lack of functionality of the fallopian tubes after childbearing (N = 320; 92%).

Conclusions: The patient decision aid was used by a majority of patients who received it. The decision aid was regarded by patients as user-friendly, and it was recommended to be used in the decision-making process for opportunistic salpingectomy. Patients stated that the decision aid provides reliable information and increases patients' knowledge of opportunistic salpingectomy.

机会性输卵管切除术和输卵管切除术作为预防卵巢癌绝育方法的患者决策辅助评估。
摘要:一种关于机会性输卵管切除术和输卵管切除术作为绝育方法的患者决策辅助工具已被开发,以提供统一的咨询和减少实践差异。本研究的目的是评估患者决策辅助在日常临床实践中的使用,以确保其有效性和可用性,以及其对决策过程和机会性输卵管切除术决策的影响。材料和方法:作为stopovca实施研究的一部分,我们于2020年7月至2024年2月在16家医院进行了一项多中心观察性研究。有条件进行机会性输卵管切除术的患者在考虑是否进行机会性输卵管切除术时被邀请使用决策辅助工具。使用数字问卷来评估决策辅助、决策过程和患者术后6-8周的决策。结果:542例患者中有425例参与问卷调查。这425例患者中的大多数接受了治疗(N = 357;84%)并使用决策辅助(N = 347;82%)。三分之二(N = 234;67%)使用决策辅助的患者表示,它增加了他们对机会性输卵管切除术的了解。患者认为决策辅助是一种可用的辅助工具,评分8.1分(满分10分),并将其推荐给其他面临机会性输卵管切除术决策的患者。患者认为他们参与决策过程的程度较高,而决策冲突较低。大多数使用辅助决策的患者选择机会性输卵管切除术(N = 326;95%)。选择机会性输卵管切除术的主要原因是卵巢癌的降低风险作用(N = 311;90%)和产后输卵管功能缺失(N = 320;92%)。结论:患者决策辅助系统被大多数患者使用。患者认为决策辅助工具使用方便,建议在机会性输卵管切除术的决策过程中使用。患者表示,辅助决策提供了可靠的信息,并增加了患者对机会性输卵管切除术的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信