Characteristics of post-polypectomy colorectal cancer events and deaths.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jiyue Qin, Ashley Earles, Mark Lamm, Hanin Yassin, Joshua Demb, Lin Liu, Samir Gupta
{"title":"Characteristics of post-polypectomy colorectal cancer events and deaths.","authors":"Jiyue Qin, Ashley Earles, Mark Lamm, Hanin Yassin, Joshua Demb, Lin Liu, Samir Gupta","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Post-polypectomy colorectal cancers (PPCRCs) are diagnosed after a cancer-negative colonoscopy with polypectomy. Analyzing PPCRC characteristics informs prevention and early detection strategies. We investigated interval types and etiologies of PPCRCs using World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PPCRCs were identified in a retrospective cohort of U.S. Veterans who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy 1999-2016. We classified PPCRCs into interval, non-interval type A, non-interval type B, defined as cancers diagnosed before, at, and after next recommended surveillance exam, respectively. A root cause analysis was conducted to determine the most plausible etiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 396 PPCRC events and 90 PPCRC deaths over a median follow-up of 3.9 and 4.2 years, respectively. Among PPCRC events, 55% (95% CI: 50%, 60%) were interval, 12% (CI: 9%, 15%) non-interval type A and 33% (CI: 29%, 38%) non-interval type B. Interval cancers were more likely to be diagnosed at stage 4 than non-interval cancers (16% interval vs 2.1% non-interval A, 8.3% non-interval B, p = 0.003). Most interval cancers were due to possible missed lesions with adequate examinations (60%, CI: 53%, 66%), while most non-interval cancers were likely new CRCs (type A: 48%, CI: 34%, 62%; type B: 84%, CI: 77%, 90%). Similar results were found for PPCRC deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most PPCRC events and deaths were diagnosed before the next recommended exam, largely due to procedural factors, underscoring the need to optimize quality of baseline colonoscopy and polypectomy. Many PPCRCs were diagnosed after recommended exam, suggesting the need to improve patient adherence to recommended surveillance intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Post-polypectomy colorectal cancers (PPCRCs) are diagnosed after a cancer-negative colonoscopy with polypectomy. Analyzing PPCRC characteristics informs prevention and early detection strategies. We investigated interval types and etiologies of PPCRCs using World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) guidelines.

Methods: PPCRCs were identified in a retrospective cohort of U.S. Veterans who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy 1999-2016. We classified PPCRCs into interval, non-interval type A, non-interval type B, defined as cancers diagnosed before, at, and after next recommended surveillance exam, respectively. A root cause analysis was conducted to determine the most plausible etiology.

Results: We identified 396 PPCRC events and 90 PPCRC deaths over a median follow-up of 3.9 and 4.2 years, respectively. Among PPCRC events, 55% (95% CI: 50%, 60%) were interval, 12% (CI: 9%, 15%) non-interval type A and 33% (CI: 29%, 38%) non-interval type B. Interval cancers were more likely to be diagnosed at stage 4 than non-interval cancers (16% interval vs 2.1% non-interval A, 8.3% non-interval B, p = 0.003). Most interval cancers were due to possible missed lesions with adequate examinations (60%, CI: 53%, 66%), while most non-interval cancers were likely new CRCs (type A: 48%, CI: 34%, 62%; type B: 84%, CI: 77%, 90%). Similar results were found for PPCRC deaths.

Conclusions: Most PPCRC events and deaths were diagnosed before the next recommended exam, largely due to procedural factors, underscoring the need to optimize quality of baseline colonoscopy and polypectomy. Many PPCRCs were diagnosed after recommended exam, suggesting the need to improve patient adherence to recommended surveillance intervals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信