Lateral behavior of large-diameter monopiles in clay using transparent soil and centrifuge tests

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Guangwei Cao, Siau Chen Chian, Xuanming Ding, Zhibo Chen, Peng Zhou
{"title":"Lateral behavior of large-diameter monopiles in clay using transparent soil and centrifuge tests","authors":"Guangwei Cao,&nbsp;Siau Chen Chian,&nbsp;Xuanming Ding,&nbsp;Zhibo Chen,&nbsp;Peng Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11440-024-02463-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The response characteristics of large-diameter monopiles under lateral loads greatly differ from those of traditional small-diameter piles. By means of transparent soil and centrifuge tests, as well as numerical analyses, the soil flow mechanism and lateral behavior of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay were investigated. The study result reveals that a rotational failure mechanism, different from wedge-full-flow mechanisms, exists in the large-diameter monopile–soil system. For stubby large-diameter monopiles, using the classic wedge-full-flow mechanisms can lead to an overestimation of lateral capability due to its absence in considering the rotational mechanism. In addition, the normalized <i>p–y</i> curves in the rotational soil flow zone are also observed to have larger initial stiffness and attain yield plateau earlier than those in wedge-full-flow zone. Differences in <i>N</i><sub><i>p</i></sub> values among different centrifuge tests are partly attributed to the different means of obtaining the clay’s undrained shear strength. When the undrained strength from consolidated undrained triaxial tests is taken, consistent values of <i>N</i><sub><i>p</i></sub> originating from different test results are observed. Finally, based on the results from centrifuge tests and well-calibrated numerical analyses, an empirical formulation of <i>N</i><sub><i>p</i></sub> for large-diameter monopiles in soft clay is proposed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 4","pages":"1795 - 1812"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-024-02463-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The response characteristics of large-diameter monopiles under lateral loads greatly differ from those of traditional small-diameter piles. By means of transparent soil and centrifuge tests, as well as numerical analyses, the soil flow mechanism and lateral behavior of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay were investigated. The study result reveals that a rotational failure mechanism, different from wedge-full-flow mechanisms, exists in the large-diameter monopile–soil system. For stubby large-diameter monopiles, using the classic wedge-full-flow mechanisms can lead to an overestimation of lateral capability due to its absence in considering the rotational mechanism. In addition, the normalized p–y curves in the rotational soil flow zone are also observed to have larger initial stiffness and attain yield plateau earlier than those in wedge-full-flow zone. Differences in Np values among different centrifuge tests are partly attributed to the different means of obtaining the clay’s undrained shear strength. When the undrained strength from consolidated undrained triaxial tests is taken, consistent values of Np originating from different test results are observed. Finally, based on the results from centrifuge tests and well-calibrated numerical analyses, an empirical formulation of Np for large-diameter monopiles in soft clay is proposed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信