Paula Quiroz-Rojo, David Cantor, Mathieu Renouf, Carlos Ovalle, Emilien Azéma
{"title":"Rev assessment of granular materials with varied grading based on macro- and micro-mechanical statistical data","authors":"Paula Quiroz-Rojo, David Cantor, Mathieu Renouf, Carlos Ovalle, Emilien Azéma","doi":"10.1007/s11440-024-02498-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To assess the mechanical behavior of granular materials in triaxial tests, a mandatory condition is to guarantee a representative elemental volume (REV) sample. This is achieved by limiting the minimum sample size and the coarsest particle in the sample (<span>\\(d_\\textrm{max}\\)</span>). The common geotechnical practice is based on the sample scales <i>H</i>/<i>D</i> and <span>\\(\\alpha = D/d_\\textrm{max}\\)</span>, where <i>D</i> is the sample diameter and <i>H</i> is its height. While, it is widely accepted that <i>H</i>/<i>D</i> should be between 2 and 2.5, international standards do not agree on the minimum <span>\\(\\alpha\\)</span>, and the recommended values vary widely between 5 and 20. Moreover, the impact of particle size distribution on REV is not well understood and is consequently overlooked by most standards. In this paper, we present a study of the effects of <span>\\(\\alpha\\)</span> and grading on the critical shear strength of granular materials. We conducted DEM simulations of triaxial tests on samples with values of <span>\\(\\alpha\\)</span> ranging from 5 to 20 and grading that varied from mono-size particle assemblies to samples, where the ratio between the coarsest and finest particle was <span>\\(d_\\textrm{max}/d_\\textrm{min}\\ = 4\\)</span>. The results show that the minimum <span>\\(\\alpha\\)</span> required to obtain an REV depends on grading. While, for mono-size particle assemblies REV conditions are obtained for <span>\\(\\alpha \\ \\ge 12.5\\)</span>, better graded samples behave as REV once <span>\\(\\alpha \\ \\ge \\ 8\\)</span>. A detailed analysis of macro and microscopic parameters reveals that <span>\\(\\alpha\\)</span> is not necessarily the most suitable parameter to assess REV scales. We discover that, in our samples, a unique relationship between critical shear strength and the number of grains carrying interparticle forces (<span>\\(N_p^*\\)</span>) exists independently of grading. In effect, REV can be systematically defined as long as <span>\\(N_p^* \\ge 3000\\)</span>. The physical source of this observation is linked to the evolution of contact arrangement and force transmission mechanisms, which evolve according to the number of particles engaged in load bearing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 4","pages":"1585 - 1598"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-024-02498-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To assess the mechanical behavior of granular materials in triaxial tests, a mandatory condition is to guarantee a representative elemental volume (REV) sample. This is achieved by limiting the minimum sample size and the coarsest particle in the sample (\(d_\textrm{max}\)). The common geotechnical practice is based on the sample scales H/D and \(\alpha = D/d_\textrm{max}\), where D is the sample diameter and H is its height. While, it is widely accepted that H/D should be between 2 and 2.5, international standards do not agree on the minimum \(\alpha\), and the recommended values vary widely between 5 and 20. Moreover, the impact of particle size distribution on REV is not well understood and is consequently overlooked by most standards. In this paper, we present a study of the effects of \(\alpha\) and grading on the critical shear strength of granular materials. We conducted DEM simulations of triaxial tests on samples with values of \(\alpha\) ranging from 5 to 20 and grading that varied from mono-size particle assemblies to samples, where the ratio between the coarsest and finest particle was \(d_\textrm{max}/d_\textrm{min}\ = 4\). The results show that the minimum \(\alpha\) required to obtain an REV depends on grading. While, for mono-size particle assemblies REV conditions are obtained for \(\alpha \ \ge 12.5\), better graded samples behave as REV once \(\alpha \ \ge \ 8\). A detailed analysis of macro and microscopic parameters reveals that \(\alpha\) is not necessarily the most suitable parameter to assess REV scales. We discover that, in our samples, a unique relationship between critical shear strength and the number of grains carrying interparticle forces (\(N_p^*\)) exists independently of grading. In effect, REV can be systematically defined as long as \(N_p^* \ge 3000\). The physical source of this observation is linked to the evolution of contact arrangement and force transmission mechanisms, which evolve according to the number of particles engaged in load bearing.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.