A weight combination anisotropic strength criterion considering the effect of joint orientation

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Qingci Qin, Kegang Li, Mingliang Li, Shunchuan Wu, Naeem Abbas, Rui Yue
{"title":"A weight combination anisotropic strength criterion considering the effect of joint orientation","authors":"Qingci Qin,&nbsp;Kegang Li,&nbsp;Mingliang Li,&nbsp;Shunchuan Wu,&nbsp;Naeem Abbas,&nbsp;Rui Yue","doi":"10.1007/s11440-024-02467-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In natural geological bodies, many sedimentary or metamorphic rocks exhibit significant bedding or cleavage characteristics. Such rocks show remarkable anisotropy and nonlinearity in mechanical behavior. Therefore, the strength theory of isotropic homogeneous bodies is difficult to meet the design requirements of this type of rock mass engineering. In particular, there are few reports on the research of anisotropic strength criteria under multiaxial stress, which seriously affects the safety of underground rock mass engineering construction and design. The spatial relationship between weak planes and principal stresses is the key to the anisotropy of the mechanical properties of jointed rock masses. In view of this, this paper deduces the strength criterion of layered rock masses under multiaxial stress by analyzing the normal stress and shear stress on the weak planes of joints and combining it with the Mohr–Coulomb strength theory. However, this criterion cannot describe the failure of intact rock matrix materials. To address this limitation, this paper normalizes the influence of joint orientation on strength and constructs a weight combination anisotropic multiaxial strength criterion considering the influence of joint direction. Then, taking the influence of joint direction as a weight parameter and multiplying it by the strength criterion of intact rock, the relationship between the failure strength of layered jointed rocks and joint direction is established. The model was verified by 507 sets of experimental data from nine types of rocks, confirming its good applicability and reliability in describing the influence of joint orientation on rock strength.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 4","pages":"1681 - 1701"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-024-02467-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In natural geological bodies, many sedimentary or metamorphic rocks exhibit significant bedding or cleavage characteristics. Such rocks show remarkable anisotropy and nonlinearity in mechanical behavior. Therefore, the strength theory of isotropic homogeneous bodies is difficult to meet the design requirements of this type of rock mass engineering. In particular, there are few reports on the research of anisotropic strength criteria under multiaxial stress, which seriously affects the safety of underground rock mass engineering construction and design. The spatial relationship between weak planes and principal stresses is the key to the anisotropy of the mechanical properties of jointed rock masses. In view of this, this paper deduces the strength criterion of layered rock masses under multiaxial stress by analyzing the normal stress and shear stress on the weak planes of joints and combining it with the Mohr–Coulomb strength theory. However, this criterion cannot describe the failure of intact rock matrix materials. To address this limitation, this paper normalizes the influence of joint orientation on strength and constructs a weight combination anisotropic multiaxial strength criterion considering the influence of joint direction. Then, taking the influence of joint direction as a weight parameter and multiplying it by the strength criterion of intact rock, the relationship between the failure strength of layered jointed rocks and joint direction is established. The model was verified by 507 sets of experimental data from nine types of rocks, confirming its good applicability and reliability in describing the influence of joint orientation on rock strength.

考虑节理方向影响的权重组合各向异性强度准则
在自然地质体中,许多沉积岩或变质岩表现出明显的层理或解理特征。这些岩石在力学行为上表现出显著的各向异性和非线性。因此,各向同性均质体的强度理论很难满足这类岩体工程的设计要求。特别是多轴应力下各向异性强度准则的研究报道较少,严重影响了地下岩体工程建设和设计的安全。弱面与主应力之间的空间关系是节理岩体力学特性各向异性的关键。鉴于此,本文通过分析节理弱面上的正应力和剪应力,结合莫尔-库仑强度理论,推导出多轴应力作用下层状岩体的强度判据。然而,该准则不能描述完整岩石基质材料的破坏。针对这一缺陷,本文将节理方向对强度的影响归一化,构建了考虑节理方向影响的权重组合各向异性多轴强度准则。然后,以节理方向的影响作为权重参数,乘以完整岩石的强度准则,建立层状节理岩石破坏强度与节理方向的关系。通过对9种岩石507组试验数据的验证,证实了该模型在描述节理方向对岩石强度影响方面具有良好的适用性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信