Maryse Charpentier-Noyer , Olivier Payrastre , Eric Gaume , Pierre Nicolle , François Bouttier , Axelle Fleury , Hugo Marchal
{"title":"An agent-based modeling of rescue operations for the evaluation of short-range flash flood forecasts","authors":"Maryse Charpentier-Noyer , Olivier Payrastre , Eric Gaume , Pierre Nicolle , François Bouttier , Axelle Fleury , Hugo Marchal","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents the application of an agent based model to evaluate how short-range flood forecasts may improve the emergency management of a severe flash-flood event. The considered flood hit several inhabited areas in the Aude River basin, south-eastern France, in October 2018. Particularly, the capacity to trigger timely rescue operations at the right places is evaluated and compared, depending on the input information used in the emergency decision process: from rainfall observations up to flash flood impacts forecasts at the river reach scale. To achieve this evaluation, the field operations of firemen rescue teams are simulated in an agent-based model, which provides a detailed description of the complexity of the emergency situation: location and timing of flood damages, limited number of rescue teams, traveling times, decisions taken under uncertainty about the future evolution of the event. The flash flood impacts forecasts involved in the decisions are obtained using (i) three different short range (0-6h) quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) products or a naive zero future rainfall scenario, (ii) a distributed hydrological model and (iii) a simple impacts model evaluating the number of flooded buildings. The presented results confirm that the efficiency of the rescue operations is generally improved when using QPFs as input of the decision chain, due to the increased anticipation. But they also illustrate how this added value can be highly altered by the combined effects of forecast uncertainties (false alarms) and limited available rescue means. In a fictive situation where rescue means are extremely limited, using a zero future rainfall scenario proves to be almost as efficient as using QPFs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133048"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003865","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents the application of an agent based model to evaluate how short-range flood forecasts may improve the emergency management of a severe flash-flood event. The considered flood hit several inhabited areas in the Aude River basin, south-eastern France, in October 2018. Particularly, the capacity to trigger timely rescue operations at the right places is evaluated and compared, depending on the input information used in the emergency decision process: from rainfall observations up to flash flood impacts forecasts at the river reach scale. To achieve this evaluation, the field operations of firemen rescue teams are simulated in an agent-based model, which provides a detailed description of the complexity of the emergency situation: location and timing of flood damages, limited number of rescue teams, traveling times, decisions taken under uncertainty about the future evolution of the event. The flash flood impacts forecasts involved in the decisions are obtained using (i) three different short range (0-6h) quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) products or a naive zero future rainfall scenario, (ii) a distributed hydrological model and (iii) a simple impacts model evaluating the number of flooded buildings. The presented results confirm that the efficiency of the rescue operations is generally improved when using QPFs as input of the decision chain, due to the increased anticipation. But they also illustrate how this added value can be highly altered by the combined effects of forecast uncertainties (false alarms) and limited available rescue means. In a fictive situation where rescue means are extremely limited, using a zero future rainfall scenario proves to be almost as efficient as using QPFs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.