Where there are no visitors: Improvising care in a pediatric hospital in Zambia

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jean Hunleth , Lindsey Kaufman , Emma Bunkley , Sarah Burack , Sam Miti , Comfort Asante
{"title":"Where there are no visitors: Improvising care in a pediatric hospital in Zambia","authors":"Jean Hunleth ,&nbsp;Lindsey Kaufman ,&nbsp;Emma Bunkley ,&nbsp;Sarah Burack ,&nbsp;Sam Miti ,&nbsp;Comfort Asante","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In hospitals in Zambia, family members carry out intimate and care procedures, run errands, and offer emotional and practical support to patients. However, their presence also creates challenges when they use resources, take up space dedicated to patients, and contribute to disease spread. The COVID-19 pandemic brought such tensions into view and drove hospital administrators, clinicians, and researchers to draw a bright line between family as caregivers (considered necessary) and family as visitors (considered extraneous). In this article, we ask: If caregivers are not visitors, then who are visitors? What is the work of visiting? From 2020 to 2021, we carried out research in a Zambian pediatric hospital when visitors were not allowed to enter the hospital, but a singular caregiver was required at the bedside of each child admitted. Our findings from interviews with 44 healthcare workers and 30 caregivers revealed several themes—that the care work required in hospitals surpasses the ability of a single caregiver; that ephemeral encounters between caregivers and visitors facilitate sympathy driven care; and that witnessing need could catalyze and exhibit support. We expand on these themes, focusing on one grandmother's months-long stay with her granddaughter in the hospital, to show how caregiver, visitor, and healthcare worker roles were improvised and reworked. Ultimately, this research breaks down binaries commonly cited in discussions of family caregiving, such as essential and non-essential, helpful and wasteful, caregiver and visitor. This has policy implications because ignoring or dismissing visitors as extraneous will further disadvantage caregivers and patients and disenfranchise families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 117931"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In hospitals in Zambia, family members carry out intimate and care procedures, run errands, and offer emotional and practical support to patients. However, their presence also creates challenges when they use resources, take up space dedicated to patients, and contribute to disease spread. The COVID-19 pandemic brought such tensions into view and drove hospital administrators, clinicians, and researchers to draw a bright line between family as caregivers (considered necessary) and family as visitors (considered extraneous). In this article, we ask: If caregivers are not visitors, then who are visitors? What is the work of visiting? From 2020 to 2021, we carried out research in a Zambian pediatric hospital when visitors were not allowed to enter the hospital, but a singular caregiver was required at the bedside of each child admitted. Our findings from interviews with 44 healthcare workers and 30 caregivers revealed several themes—that the care work required in hospitals surpasses the ability of a single caregiver; that ephemeral encounters between caregivers and visitors facilitate sympathy driven care; and that witnessing need could catalyze and exhibit support. We expand on these themes, focusing on one grandmother's months-long stay with her granddaughter in the hospital, to show how caregiver, visitor, and healthcare worker roles were improvised and reworked. Ultimately, this research breaks down binaries commonly cited in discussions of family caregiving, such as essential and non-essential, helpful and wasteful, caregiver and visitor. This has policy implications because ignoring or dismissing visitors as extraneous will further disadvantage caregivers and patients and disenfranchise families.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信