Effect of irregular perforation patterns on axial load-deformation response of cold-formed steel columns in a hybrid frame-wall

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Salih Rakici, Fatmir Menkulasi
{"title":"Effect of irregular perforation patterns on axial load-deformation response of cold-formed steel columns in a hybrid frame-wall","authors":"Salih Rakici,&nbsp;Fatmir Menkulasi","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A hybrid cold-formed steel (CFS) load bearing frame-wall capable of supplying enhanced lateral load capacity is presented. The frame-wall features discrete CFS columns that resist gravitational loads. The CFS columns have irregular perforation patterns in the web to accommodate several layers of tension-only diagonal bracing installed in the plane of the hybrid frame-wall. The impact of said perforations on CFS column axial load-deformation response is studied with validated nonlinear finite element analysis and through comparisons with the axial response of CFS columns with standard perforation patterns. Irregular perforation patterns caused by one, two, and three layers of diagonal bracing are considered. The effect of boundary conditions, sheet metal thickness, imperfections, and bracing on irregularly perforated CFS column axial load-deformation response is quantified. Computed elastic buckling loads and axial capacities are compared with predicted values. The considered prediction frameworks result in average overpredictions of axial load capacity by 13 % for pin-supported columns and average underpredictions by 9 % for fixed-end columns. The hypothesis that an increase in the number of perforations along the length of the member results in a decrease in axial load capacity is found to be true for pin-supported columns that exhibited global flexural buckling and untrue for fixed-end columns and braced pinned columns that feature irregular perforation patterns. It is concluded that if the CFS columns in the hybrid frame-wall feature standard perforation sizes and perforation spacing is not smaller than column depth, the impact of irregular perforation patterns on axial load-deformation response and capacity is limited, regardless of the variation of perforation density along the height of the column. If perforation sizes are enlarged, reductions in axial load capacity become notable. Similarly, reductions in sheet metal thickness and increases in imperfections exacerbate the effect of irregular perforation patterns on CFS column axial load-deformation response and capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 120159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A hybrid cold-formed steel (CFS) load bearing frame-wall capable of supplying enhanced lateral load capacity is presented. The frame-wall features discrete CFS columns that resist gravitational loads. The CFS columns have irregular perforation patterns in the web to accommodate several layers of tension-only diagonal bracing installed in the plane of the hybrid frame-wall. The impact of said perforations on CFS column axial load-deformation response is studied with validated nonlinear finite element analysis and through comparisons with the axial response of CFS columns with standard perforation patterns. Irregular perforation patterns caused by one, two, and three layers of diagonal bracing are considered. The effect of boundary conditions, sheet metal thickness, imperfections, and bracing on irregularly perforated CFS column axial load-deformation response is quantified. Computed elastic buckling loads and axial capacities are compared with predicted values. The considered prediction frameworks result in average overpredictions of axial load capacity by 13 % for pin-supported columns and average underpredictions by 9 % for fixed-end columns. The hypothesis that an increase in the number of perforations along the length of the member results in a decrease in axial load capacity is found to be true for pin-supported columns that exhibited global flexural buckling and untrue for fixed-end columns and braced pinned columns that feature irregular perforation patterns. It is concluded that if the CFS columns in the hybrid frame-wall feature standard perforation sizes and perforation spacing is not smaller than column depth, the impact of irregular perforation patterns on axial load-deformation response and capacity is limited, regardless of the variation of perforation density along the height of the column. If perforation sizes are enlarged, reductions in axial load capacity become notable. Similarly, reductions in sheet metal thickness and increases in imperfections exacerbate the effect of irregular perforation patterns on CFS column axial load-deformation response and capacity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信