{"title":"Assessing the impact of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on pregnancy loss: An environmental-wide association study in Northwest China","authors":"Ling Liu, Cai Liu, Wei Zhang, Fang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are emerging environmental contaminants with potential metabolic and endocrine-disrupting properties that may affect women's reproductive health. However, their specific role in pregnancy loss remains relatively understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the association between exposure to multiple PFAS and the association with pregnancy loss (PL) in a population from Northwest China using an environment-wide association study (EWAS) approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A case-control study was conducted at a university-affiliated reproductive center, enrolling 348 women with a history of PL and 320 controls with at least one live birth and no history of pregnancy loss. Serum concentrations of ten PFAS were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) following a standardized extraction and purification protocol. Demographic and clinical data were collected via a structured questionnaire. An elastic net regression model (ENRM) was employed for variable selection, identifying PFASs to be included in the subsequent EWAS analysis. Associations between individual PFAS and PL were then evaluated using logistic regression, and EWAS was utilized to explore the overall associations between PFAS mixture exposure and PL, accounting for potential interactions and multicollinearity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The EWAS identified five PFASs—PFPeS, PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA—with significantly higher exposure odds in pregnancy loss cases versus live birth controls (adjusted ORs: 1.82 [1.31–2.62], 1.34 [1.19–1.51], 1.73 [1.46–2.07], 1.33 [1.14–1.56], and 1.73 [1.40–2.15], respectively). Subgroup analyses confirmed robust associations, with PFOA consistently linked to elevated exposure odds across demographic and clinical strata.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates a significant association between exposure to multiple PFAS, notably PFPeS, PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA, and an increased risk of pregnancy loss in a Northwest Chinese population. The particularly robust association observed with PFOA across diverse subgroups underscores its potential as a significant environmental risk factor for PL. These findings highlight the need for further research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to develop strategies for reducing PFAS exposure among women of reproductive age.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13994,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 114568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463925000501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are emerging environmental contaminants with potential metabolic and endocrine-disrupting properties that may affect women's reproductive health. However, their specific role in pregnancy loss remains relatively understudied.
Objectives
This study aimed to assess the association between exposure to multiple PFAS and the association with pregnancy loss (PL) in a population from Northwest China using an environment-wide association study (EWAS) approach.
Methods
A case-control study was conducted at a university-affiliated reproductive center, enrolling 348 women with a history of PL and 320 controls with at least one live birth and no history of pregnancy loss. Serum concentrations of ten PFAS were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) following a standardized extraction and purification protocol. Demographic and clinical data were collected via a structured questionnaire. An elastic net regression model (ENRM) was employed for variable selection, identifying PFASs to be included in the subsequent EWAS analysis. Associations between individual PFAS and PL were then evaluated using logistic regression, and EWAS was utilized to explore the overall associations between PFAS mixture exposure and PL, accounting for potential interactions and multicollinearity.
Results
The EWAS identified five PFASs—PFPeS, PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA—with significantly higher exposure odds in pregnancy loss cases versus live birth controls (adjusted ORs: 1.82 [1.31–2.62], 1.34 [1.19–1.51], 1.73 [1.46–2.07], 1.33 [1.14–1.56], and 1.73 [1.40–2.15], respectively). Subgroup analyses confirmed robust associations, with PFOA consistently linked to elevated exposure odds across demographic and clinical strata.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates a significant association between exposure to multiple PFAS, notably PFPeS, PFHxS, PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA, and an increased risk of pregnancy loss in a Northwest Chinese population. The particularly robust association observed with PFOA across diverse subgroups underscores its potential as a significant environmental risk factor for PL. These findings highlight the need for further research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to develop strategies for reducing PFAS exposure among women of reproductive age.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health serves as a multidisciplinary forum for original reports on exposure assessment and the reactions to and consequences of human exposure to the biological, chemical, and physical environment. Research reports, short communications, reviews, scientific comments, technical notes, and editorials will be peer-reviewed before acceptance for publication. Priority will be given to articles on epidemiological aspects of environmental toxicology, health risk assessments, susceptible (sub) populations, sanitation and clean water, human biomonitoring, environmental medicine, and public health aspects of exposure-related outcomes.