Forecasting interfacial bond strength in FRP-reinforced concrete using soft computing techniques

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Khalid Saqer Alotaibi , Fadi Almohammed
{"title":"Forecasting interfacial bond strength in FRP-reinforced concrete using soft computing techniques","authors":"Khalid Saqer Alotaibi ,&nbsp;Fadi Almohammed","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) retrofits have become widely used to strengthen concrete and masonry structures because of their properties including lightweight, high strength, high elastic modulus, and corrosion resistance. However, debonding failure at the FRP-substrate interface remains a challenge that undermines the effectiveness of these systems. To advance predictive modeling of interfacial bond strength (IBS), this study aims to develop machine learning (ML) approaches using a comprehensive database of experimental shear pull-out test results. The collected database consists of 855 samples encompassing a wide range of parameters, including: concrete substrate width (100–500 mm), concrete compressive strength (16–74.67 MPa), FRP material Young's modulus (23.9–425 GPa), FRP thickness (0.083–2 mm), FRP width (10–150 mm), and bonded FRP length (20–400 mm). The interfacial pull-out forces ranged from 2.4 kN to 54.79 kN. The dataset was divided into 571 training samples and 284 testing samples. Various ML algorithms, including Random Forest, Random Tree, Stochastic-Random Forest, Stochastic-Random Tree, Bagging-Random Forest, and Bagging-Random Tree, are evaluated and compared based on their performance. The stochastic-random forest technique demonstrates the highest accuracy with correlation coefficients of 0.9949 and 0.9779 for the training and testing datasets, respectively. It also achieves the lowest mean absolute error of 0.41 and 1.45, and the lowest root mean squared error of 1.07 and 2.10 for the training and testing datasets, respectively. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values are 0.99 and 0.96 for the training and testing datasets, and the comparative measure gives a value of 2.22. This research provides an optimized ML framework for reliably forecasting FRP-substrate bond strength to support the design of strengthened structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"473 ","pages":"Article 140827"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825009754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) retrofits have become widely used to strengthen concrete and masonry structures because of their properties including lightweight, high strength, high elastic modulus, and corrosion resistance. However, debonding failure at the FRP-substrate interface remains a challenge that undermines the effectiveness of these systems. To advance predictive modeling of interfacial bond strength (IBS), this study aims to develop machine learning (ML) approaches using a comprehensive database of experimental shear pull-out test results. The collected database consists of 855 samples encompassing a wide range of parameters, including: concrete substrate width (100–500 mm), concrete compressive strength (16–74.67 MPa), FRP material Young's modulus (23.9–425 GPa), FRP thickness (0.083–2 mm), FRP width (10–150 mm), and bonded FRP length (20–400 mm). The interfacial pull-out forces ranged from 2.4 kN to 54.79 kN. The dataset was divided into 571 training samples and 284 testing samples. Various ML algorithms, including Random Forest, Random Tree, Stochastic-Random Forest, Stochastic-Random Tree, Bagging-Random Forest, and Bagging-Random Tree, are evaluated and compared based on their performance. The stochastic-random forest technique demonstrates the highest accuracy with correlation coefficients of 0.9949 and 0.9779 for the training and testing datasets, respectively. It also achieves the lowest mean absolute error of 0.41 and 1.45, and the lowest root mean squared error of 1.07 and 2.10 for the training and testing datasets, respectively. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values are 0.99 and 0.96 for the training and testing datasets, and the comparative measure gives a value of 2.22. This research provides an optimized ML framework for reliably forecasting FRP-substrate bond strength to support the design of strengthened structures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信