To focus on a confederate or oneself? Attentional bias and state anxiety in socially anxious individuals during real-time online video calls

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Wen Gao, Qinglin Hu, Yongqi Xu
{"title":"To focus on a confederate or oneself? Attentional bias and state anxiety in socially anxious individuals during real-time online video calls","authors":"Wen Gao,&nbsp;Qinglin Hu,&nbsp;Yongqi Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Attentional bias toward threatening stimuli and heightened self-focused attention are pivotal factors in the activation and perpetuation of high social anxiety. Literature on attentional biases between external social cues and self-relevant information has yielded inconsistent findings due to diverse experimental tasks and materials. With a videoconferencing platform and eye-tracking technology, this study assessed state anxiety and attentional bias between self- and other-related cues among individuals with different sex and social anxiety levels (n = 82) in various social contexts (speech and conversation) and social feedback (positive, neutral, and negative). Eye-movement data revealed that individuals focus more on the other person than themselves during online video interactions. However, individuals with high social anxiety tend to focus more on themselves and less on others compared to those with low social anxiety, particularly in males. Males with high social anxiety distributed their attention equally between their social partners and themselves, while females with high social anxiety did not. Self-reported data indicated higher anxiety during speeches than conversations. Those with high social anxiety showed significant differences from baseline levels during tasks, in contrast to those with low social anxiety. Subjective anxiety was more pronounced for negative feedback than for neutral or positive feedback, especially in females. These findings enhance understanding of attentional biases in individuals with high social anxiety and suggest that videoconferencing could benefit therapy for individuals with social anxiety disorder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 104734"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725000567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attentional bias toward threatening stimuli and heightened self-focused attention are pivotal factors in the activation and perpetuation of high social anxiety. Literature on attentional biases between external social cues and self-relevant information has yielded inconsistent findings due to diverse experimental tasks and materials. With a videoconferencing platform and eye-tracking technology, this study assessed state anxiety and attentional bias between self- and other-related cues among individuals with different sex and social anxiety levels (n = 82) in various social contexts (speech and conversation) and social feedback (positive, neutral, and negative). Eye-movement data revealed that individuals focus more on the other person than themselves during online video interactions. However, individuals with high social anxiety tend to focus more on themselves and less on others compared to those with low social anxiety, particularly in males. Males with high social anxiety distributed their attention equally between their social partners and themselves, while females with high social anxiety did not. Self-reported data indicated higher anxiety during speeches than conversations. Those with high social anxiety showed significant differences from baseline levels during tasks, in contrast to those with low social anxiety. Subjective anxiety was more pronounced for negative feedback than for neutral or positive feedback, especially in females. These findings enhance understanding of attentional biases in individuals with high social anxiety and suggest that videoconferencing could benefit therapy for individuals with social anxiety disorder.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信