Development and Implementation of the FAST-PACE Assessment Framework and Tiered Analgesic Orders for Opioid Optimization

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Lena Ngo RN, MSN, CNS , Marilyn Bazinski DNP, AGCNS, RN, PMGT-BC
{"title":"Development and Implementation of the FAST-PACE Assessment Framework and Tiered Analgesic Orders for Opioid Optimization","authors":"Lena Ngo RN, MSN, CNS ,&nbsp;Marilyn Bazinski DNP, AGCNS, RN, PMGT-BC","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this presentation is to share how one academic medical center adopted a holistic pain assessment framework and multimodal order sets to guide administration of analgesic therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Summary of Evidence</h3><div>Significant patient harms have been attributed to opioids, so stewardship programs are required. The CDC and an international panel of health care professionals recommends administering opioids to functional outcomes. Change was instigated by revised inpatient order sets and creation of a holistic framework. These methods aim to address patient-specific recovery goals and minimize long and short-term adverse effects while support nursing practice.</div></div><div><h3>Validation of Evidence</h3><div>Revised opioid-sparing order sets and staff and patient education modules will be reviewed. Analysis of how FAST-PACE guides prescribing or administering analgesia will be described. Learn how Plan-Do-Study-Act process improvement guides ongoing interdisciplinary Opioid Optimization workgroup actions. Consider preparation for a second regulatory survey since implementing this practice change. Discuss importance of just-in-time education to support clinician, and patient/caregiver adoption of this evidence-based process.</div></div><div><h3>Results/Relevance to Pain Management</h3><div>Revised opioid-sparing order sets rolled out in March of 2022; A significant practice change entailing ongoing evaluation and reinforcement. No patient harms have been directly attributed to this practice change. Metrics to measure quality, safety and nursing adherence to the tiered approach are underway. Existing EPIC workbench reports display 80-90% provider conformity to the tiered, multimodal approach.</div></div><div><h3>Future Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Changing from the former ubiquitous method of dosing opioids to pain intensity scores will take time. Both patients and staff will benefit from routine reinforcement and rationale for this practice change. Patient well-being, function, and risk mitigation are the driving forces behind this initiative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 2","pages":"Page e227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904225000724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this presentation is to share how one academic medical center adopted a holistic pain assessment framework and multimodal order sets to guide administration of analgesic therapies.

Summary of Evidence

Significant patient harms have been attributed to opioids, so stewardship programs are required. The CDC and an international panel of health care professionals recommends administering opioids to functional outcomes. Change was instigated by revised inpatient order sets and creation of a holistic framework. These methods aim to address patient-specific recovery goals and minimize long and short-term adverse effects while support nursing practice.

Validation of Evidence

Revised opioid-sparing order sets and staff and patient education modules will be reviewed. Analysis of how FAST-PACE guides prescribing or administering analgesia will be described. Learn how Plan-Do-Study-Act process improvement guides ongoing interdisciplinary Opioid Optimization workgroup actions. Consider preparation for a second regulatory survey since implementing this practice change. Discuss importance of just-in-time education to support clinician, and patient/caregiver adoption of this evidence-based process.

Results/Relevance to Pain Management

Revised opioid-sparing order sets rolled out in March of 2022; A significant practice change entailing ongoing evaluation and reinforcement. No patient harms have been directly attributed to this practice change. Metrics to measure quality, safety and nursing adherence to the tiered approach are underway. Existing EPIC workbench reports display 80-90% provider conformity to the tiered, multimodal approach.

Future Implications for Nursing Practice

Changing from the former ubiquitous method of dosing opioids to pain intensity scores will take time. Both patients and staff will benefit from routine reinforcement and rationale for this practice change. Patient well-being, function, and risk mitigation are the driving forces behind this initiative.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信