Dimensions and clusters of abortion legal attitudes: A cross-national analysis of diverse nations

IF 3.2 2区社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY

Social Science Research Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103173

Juan J. Fernández , Amy Adamczyk

{"title":"Dimensions and clusters of abortion legal attitudes: A cross-national analysis of diverse nations","authors":"Juan J. Fernández , Amy Adamczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature on abortion attitudes displays a clear dualism. Cross-national studies conceptualize these attitudes as unidimensional (higher vs lower tolerance). But country case-studies indicate that attitudes are more complicated than what a continuous (higher/lower) or categorical (pro-choice vs pro-life) differentiation may suggest. Cross-national studies thus likely understate the complexity of abortion views. Utilizing a unique cross-national database and confirmatory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and multivariate regressions, we fill this void. In our sample of 23 diverse nations, we find that respondents are more supportive when the mother's health is in danger and during earlier gestational stages, and they are less likely to punish the woman than the provider when it is illegal. We also show that women, better educated, richer, and more liberal people are more likely to support abortion across different dimensions in the cross-national context. These relationships are largely similar across different legal environments. Finally, we show that attitudes related to the various legal dimensions of abortion are best characterized as multi-dimensional.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 103173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature on abortion attitudes displays a clear dualism. Cross-national studies conceptualize these attitudes as unidimensional (higher vs lower tolerance). But country case-studies indicate that attitudes are more complicated than what a continuous (higher/lower) or categorical (pro-choice vs pro-life) differentiation may suggest. Cross-national studies thus likely understate the complexity of abortion views. Utilizing a unique cross-national database and confirmatory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and multivariate regressions, we fill this void. In our sample of 23 diverse nations, we find that respondents are more supportive when the mother's health is in danger and during earlier gestational stages, and they are less likely to punish the woman than the provider when it is illegal. We also show that women, better educated, richer, and more liberal people are more likely to support abortion across different dimensions in the cross-national context. These relationships are largely similar across different legal environments. Finally, we show that attitudes related to the various legal dimensions of abortion are best characterized as multi-dimensional.

查看原文本刊更多论文

堕胎法律态度的维度和集群：不同国家的跨国分析

文献对堕胎的态度表现出明显的二元论。跨国研究将这些态度概念化为单向度（高与低容忍度）。但国家个案研究表明，态度比持续的（高/低）或明确的（支持堕胎vs反对堕胎）分化所暗示的要复杂得多。因此，跨国研究可能低估了堕胎观点的复杂性。利用独特的跨国数据库和验证性因素分析，聚类分析和多元回归，我们填补了这一空白。在我们对23个不同国家的抽样调查中，我们发现，当母亲的健康处于危险之中和在妊娠早期阶段时，受访者更支持母亲，当母亲的健康处于危险之中时，他们比提供者更不可能惩罚妇女，因为这是非法的。我们还表明，在跨国背景下，女性、受过更好教育的人、更富有的人和更自由的人更有可能在不同的方面支持堕胎。这些关系在不同的法律环境中大体相似。最后，我们表明，与堕胎的各种法律层面有关的态度最好被描述为多维的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Science Research SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

4.00%

发文量

审稿时长

65 days

期刊介绍： Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.