The part that we play: Engineers’ perceptions of their responsibility for public safety

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jan Hayes , Sarah Maslen , Sarah Holdsworth , Orana Sandri
{"title":"The part that we play: Engineers’ perceptions of their responsibility for public safety","authors":"Jan Hayes ,&nbsp;Sarah Maslen ,&nbsp;Sarah Holdsworth ,&nbsp;Orana Sandri","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the study of accident causation and prevention, safety research favors organizational explanations that minimize consideration of the agency of individuals. Challenging this framing of how to promote excellent safety performance in organizations, this paper presents an analysis of the perceptions of responsibility among practicing engineers regarding their role in public safety. Drawing on data from professional development workshops for gas sector engineers involving close to 100 participants, we found that engineers adopt a backward-looking responsibility framework to understand accident cases as linked to engineering practice for accident prevention. Many participants explain that they are far from the passive actors an organizational view of accidents would suggest. In a forward-looking responsibility framework, they describe the importance of speaking up, the professional obligation to do so and strategies to be more effective in articulating recommendations to management. While they do not consider themselves as passive actors, the engineers were also acutely aware of the challenges of asserting influence in large organizations. This research shows the complex and nuanced interrelationship between engineering and management decision making, highlighting an under researched area of safety science.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 106862"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the study of accident causation and prevention, safety research favors organizational explanations that minimize consideration of the agency of individuals. Challenging this framing of how to promote excellent safety performance in organizations, this paper presents an analysis of the perceptions of responsibility among practicing engineers regarding their role in public safety. Drawing on data from professional development workshops for gas sector engineers involving close to 100 participants, we found that engineers adopt a backward-looking responsibility framework to understand accident cases as linked to engineering practice for accident prevention. Many participants explain that they are far from the passive actors an organizational view of accidents would suggest. In a forward-looking responsibility framework, they describe the importance of speaking up, the professional obligation to do so and strategies to be more effective in articulating recommendations to management. While they do not consider themselves as passive actors, the engineers were also acutely aware of the challenges of asserting influence in large organizations. This research shows the complex and nuanced interrelationship between engineering and management decision making, highlighting an under researched area of safety science.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信