A comprehensive comparison of two commonly used BMI thresholds for non-communicable diseases and multimorbidity in the Chinese population

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hong Fan , Matina Kouvari , Chengnan Guo , Zhenqiu Liu , Xin Zhang , Haili Wang , Yi Li , Tiejun Zhang , Christos S. Mantzoros
{"title":"A comprehensive comparison of two commonly used BMI thresholds for non-communicable diseases and multimorbidity in the Chinese population","authors":"Hong Fan ,&nbsp;Matina Kouvari ,&nbsp;Chengnan Guo ,&nbsp;Zhenqiu Liu ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang ,&nbsp;Haili Wang ,&nbsp;Yi Li ,&nbsp;Tiejun Zhang ,&nbsp;Christos S. Mantzoros","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Various body mass index (BMI) thresholds are used to classify overweight and obesity in the Chinese population. We compared two commonly applied BMI classifications for Chinese population: World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (overweight: BMI≥23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; obesity: BMI≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and China Working Group criteria (overweight: BMI≥24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; obesity: BMI≥28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) across 14 non-communicable diseases and multimorbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This research utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study at baseline and after 9 years of follow-up (2011–2020). The sample comprised of 13,519 individuals in 2011 (mean age: 59 (10) years, mean BMI: 23.4 (3.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, female: 53.20 %), with 9841 followed up in 2020. BMI classifications were: a. normal weight (18.5≤BMI&lt;23) <em>vs</em>. borderline overweight (23≤BMI&lt;24) <em>vs</em>. overweight (BMI≥24) b. non-obesity (18.5≤BMI&lt;25) <em>vs</em>. borderline obesity (25≤BMI&lt;28) <em>vs.</em> obesity (BMI≥28). Borderline categories represented the overlapping between the two classifications. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the associations between weight status (including borderline weight) and multiple diseases, using both WHO and China criteria for BMI thresholds. Sensitivity analyses excluded smokers, those diagnosed within the first 2 years in prospective analysis, and those diagnosed within the past three years in cross-sectional analysis, respectively. Subgroup analysis by gender and age was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overweight prevalence was 50.99 % based on WHO criteria and 40.10 % based on China criteria. Obesity prevalence was 30.65 % and 10.97 %, respectively. BMI exhibited a positive or J-shaped association with multiple cardiometabolic factors (ie, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, heart disease, stroke) and multimorbidity. Individuals with normal weight experienced a lower risk of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes [hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval): 0.71 (0.60–0.83), 0.71 (0.59–0.84), 0.64 (0.50–0.81), respectively] compared to those with borderline overweight.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Different BMI classifications greatly affect overweight and obesity estimates and have implications for predicting morbidity and mortality. Although using the China Working Group's lenient BMI threshold (BMI&lt;24 for normal and &lt;28 for overweight) may help prevent multimorbidity and most NCDs, using the WHO's stricter BMI thresholds (BMI&lt;23 and BMI&lt;25 respectively) may offer even greater cardiometabolic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425000846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

Various body mass index (BMI) thresholds are used to classify overweight and obesity in the Chinese population. We compared two commonly applied BMI classifications for Chinese population: World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (overweight: BMI≥23 kg/m2; obesity: BMI≥25 kg/m2) and China Working Group criteria (overweight: BMI≥24 kg/m2; obesity: BMI≥28 kg/m2) across 14 non-communicable diseases and multimorbidity.

Methods

This research utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study at baseline and after 9 years of follow-up (2011–2020). The sample comprised of 13,519 individuals in 2011 (mean age: 59 (10) years, mean BMI: 23.4 (3.6) kg/m2, female: 53.20 %), with 9841 followed up in 2020. BMI classifications were: a. normal weight (18.5≤BMI<23) vs. borderline overweight (23≤BMI<24) vs. overweight (BMI≥24) b. non-obesity (18.5≤BMI<25) vs. borderline obesity (25≤BMI<28) vs. obesity (BMI≥28). Borderline categories represented the overlapping between the two classifications. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the associations between weight status (including borderline weight) and multiple diseases, using both WHO and China criteria for BMI thresholds. Sensitivity analyses excluded smokers, those diagnosed within the first 2 years in prospective analysis, and those diagnosed within the past three years in cross-sectional analysis, respectively. Subgroup analysis by gender and age was conducted.

Results

Overweight prevalence was 50.99 % based on WHO criteria and 40.10 % based on China criteria. Obesity prevalence was 30.65 % and 10.97 %, respectively. BMI exhibited a positive or J-shaped association with multiple cardiometabolic factors (ie, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, heart disease, stroke) and multimorbidity. Individuals with normal weight experienced a lower risk of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes [hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval): 0.71 (0.60–0.83), 0.71 (0.59–0.84), 0.64 (0.50–0.81), respectively] compared to those with borderline overweight.

Conclusions

Different BMI classifications greatly affect overweight and obesity estimates and have implications for predicting morbidity and mortality. Although using the China Working Group's lenient BMI threshold (BMI<24 for normal and <28 for overweight) may help prevent multimorbidity and most NCDs, using the WHO's stricter BMI thresholds (BMI<23 and BMI<25 respectively) may offer even greater cardiometabolic benefits.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信