Propensity score modeling for business marketing research

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Peter Guenther , Miriam Guenther , Shekhar Misra , Mariia Koval , Ghasem Zaefarian
{"title":"Propensity score modeling for business marketing research","authors":"Peter Guenther ,&nbsp;Miriam Guenther ,&nbsp;Shekhar Misra ,&nbsp;Mariia Koval ,&nbsp;Ghasem Zaefarian","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Propensity score modeling (PSM) is a powerful statistical technique that, in the appropriate data contexts, addresses biases from confounding and selection, which can otherwise distort results and lead to erroneous inferences. However, while the number of PSM applications in business marketing research is growing, many studies mistakenly assume that PSM is a universal solution for all endogeneity issues. Often, studies lack sufficient detail about the specific endogeneity problem they aim to address, which is a critical issue, as PSM is appropriate only for certain types of endogeneity. Additionally, essential tests to confirm the validity and robustness of PSM results are frequently overlooked or insufficiently reported, raising concerns about the reliability of findings. This article aims to enhance the rigor of PSM applications in business marketing research by offering updated practical guidance on its appropriate use, key aspects to report, and common misconceptions and errors to avoid. A practical example of PSM implementation in Stata is included, along with a comprehensive checklist of justifications and best practices to guide business marketing researchers in their future PSM-based studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 14-28"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125000537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Propensity score modeling (PSM) is a powerful statistical technique that, in the appropriate data contexts, addresses biases from confounding and selection, which can otherwise distort results and lead to erroneous inferences. However, while the number of PSM applications in business marketing research is growing, many studies mistakenly assume that PSM is a universal solution for all endogeneity issues. Often, studies lack sufficient detail about the specific endogeneity problem they aim to address, which is a critical issue, as PSM is appropriate only for certain types of endogeneity. Additionally, essential tests to confirm the validity and robustness of PSM results are frequently overlooked or insufficiently reported, raising concerns about the reliability of findings. This article aims to enhance the rigor of PSM applications in business marketing research by offering updated practical guidance on its appropriate use, key aspects to report, and common misconceptions and errors to avoid. A practical example of PSM implementation in Stata is included, along with a comprehensive checklist of justifications and best practices to guide business marketing researchers in their future PSM-based studies.
商业营销研究的倾向得分模型
倾向评分模型(PSM)是一种强大的统计技术,在适当的数据环境中,它可以解决混淆和选择的偏差,否则这些偏差可能会扭曲结果并导致错误的推断。然而,虽然PSM在企业营销研究中的应用越来越多,但许多研究错误地认为PSM是所有内质性问题的通用解决方案。通常,研究缺乏足够的细节,他们的目标是解决具体的内生性问题,这是一个关键问题,因为PSM只适用于某些类型的内生性。此外,确认PSM结果的有效性和稳健性的基本测试经常被忽视或报告不足,引起了对研究结果可靠性的关注。本文旨在通过提供有关PSM的适当使用、报告的关键方面以及应避免的常见误解和错误的最新实用指导,提高PSM在商业营销研究中应用的严谨性。其中包括一个在Stata中实现PSM的实际示例,以及一个全面的理由和最佳实践清单,以指导企业营销研究人员未来基于PSM的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信