B2B customer referencing in a community of practice context: Conceptualizing legitimating mechanisms in the health technology sector

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Josefin Wiik , Nikolina Koporcic , Stefan Markovic , Leena Aarikka-Stenroos
{"title":"B2B customer referencing in a community of practice context: Conceptualizing legitimating mechanisms in the health technology sector","authors":"Josefin Wiik ,&nbsp;Nikolina Koporcic ,&nbsp;Stefan Markovic ,&nbsp;Leena Aarikka-Stenroos","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The phenomenon of customer referencing entails sellers engaging with existing customers to influence new potential customers. In a business-to-business (B2B) setting, this has typically been studied through the lens of the reference communication activities of sellers. However, the role of the customer peer community (to which both existing and new potential customers belong) and the mechanisms through which this community legitimates the seller's customer referencing activities have largely been neglected in the literature. To address this shortcoming and build on customer referencing knowledge, we draw on the community of practice (CoP) literature and empirically explore the legitimating mechanisms for customer referencing and how sellers can harness these mechanisms. Our multiple case study is based on 32 interviews with sellers and customers from the health technology sector. The findings uncover three CoP-driven mechanisms: similarity, authority, and objectivity. We develop a conceptual model based on these mechanisms, which sellers can harness to gain legitimacy for their customer referencing. We discuss the implications of the conceptual model and detail how sellers should focus on planned customer referencing tactics to facilitate peer-to-peer interactions in a customer CoP context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 29-43"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125000513","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenon of customer referencing entails sellers engaging with existing customers to influence new potential customers. In a business-to-business (B2B) setting, this has typically been studied through the lens of the reference communication activities of sellers. However, the role of the customer peer community (to which both existing and new potential customers belong) and the mechanisms through which this community legitimates the seller's customer referencing activities have largely been neglected in the literature. To address this shortcoming and build on customer referencing knowledge, we draw on the community of practice (CoP) literature and empirically explore the legitimating mechanisms for customer referencing and how sellers can harness these mechanisms. Our multiple case study is based on 32 interviews with sellers and customers from the health technology sector. The findings uncover three CoP-driven mechanisms: similarity, authority, and objectivity. We develop a conceptual model based on these mechanisms, which sellers can harness to gain legitimacy for their customer referencing. We discuss the implications of the conceptual model and detail how sellers should focus on planned customer referencing tactics to facilitate peer-to-peer interactions in a customer CoP context.
实践社区背景下的B2B客户参考:卫生技术部门合法化机制的概念化
顾客参考现象需要卖家与现有客户接触,以影响新的潜在客户。在企业对企业(B2B)环境中,这通常是通过卖家的参考沟通活动来研究的。然而,客户同伴社区(现有和新的潜在客户都属于该社区)的作用以及该社区使卖方的客户参考活动合法化的机制在很大程度上被忽视了。为了解决这一缺陷并建立在客户参考知识的基础上,我们借鉴了实践社区(CoP)文献,并实证地探索了客户参考的合法化机制以及卖家如何利用这些机制。我们的多案例研究基于对医疗技术行业卖家和客户的32次采访。研究结果揭示了三个cop驱动机制:相似性、权威性和客观性。我们基于这些机制开发了一个概念模型,卖家可以利用它来获得客户引用的合法性。我们讨论了概念模型的含义,并详细说明了卖家应该如何关注有计划的客户参考策略,以促进客户CoP环境中的点对点交互。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信