Examining the determinants of travel time use and the transfer of activities into trips

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ana Luiza S. de Sá , Patrícia Sauri Lavieri , Jacek Pawlak
{"title":"Examining the determinants of travel time use and the transfer of activities into trips","authors":"Ana Luiza S. de Sá ,&nbsp;Patrícia Sauri Lavieri ,&nbsp;Jacek Pawlak","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Travel time use has long been hypothesised to affect behavioural aspects of travel demand, such as mode choice and the value of travel time. However, travel time use can also influence how people organise their daily schedules because travellers can perform activities that release time outside the journey, a behaviour we call “activity transfer” in this study. This research develops a comprehensive conceptual framework to investigate the determinants of travel time use and activity transfer. For that, we utilise a rich dataset of a representative sample (n = 1673) of the Greater Melbourne and Geelong population (Australia) and implement an Integrated Choice Latent Variable (ICLV) model. We model three mutually exclusive behaviours: (1) no engagement in travel time use; (2) travel time use without activity transfer; and (3) travel time use with activity transfer, during a trip towards the individuals’ main activity (e.g., work, study, or other main trip purpose). The ICLV results indicate activity transfer as a time-management strategy for people overlapping different roles and, thus, potentially having more time constraints. Conversely, travel time use without transfer seems to be a strategy for decreasing the dislike of travelling. Activity transfer is more likely to occur in passengerised modes (i.e., public transport and car passenger) with favourable travel conditions (e.g., seat availability) and less likely to occur on short journeys. Bringing laptops with an internet connection to the trip is associated with travel time use with and without activity transfer, while smartphones are predictors only of the latter. Importantly, after controlling for other time-use-related latent constructs, polychronicity becomes a weak predictor of travel time use and activity transfer, suggesting a potential omitted variable bias in previous research. By unveiling fundamental aspects of travel time use, our results have significant implications for transport practice, including public transport investments, long-distance travel modes, and passenger vehicle automation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104460"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Travel time use has long been hypothesised to affect behavioural aspects of travel demand, such as mode choice and the value of travel time. However, travel time use can also influence how people organise their daily schedules because travellers can perform activities that release time outside the journey, a behaviour we call “activity transfer” in this study. This research develops a comprehensive conceptual framework to investigate the determinants of travel time use and activity transfer. For that, we utilise a rich dataset of a representative sample (n = 1673) of the Greater Melbourne and Geelong population (Australia) and implement an Integrated Choice Latent Variable (ICLV) model. We model three mutually exclusive behaviours: (1) no engagement in travel time use; (2) travel time use without activity transfer; and (3) travel time use with activity transfer, during a trip towards the individuals’ main activity (e.g., work, study, or other main trip purpose). The ICLV results indicate activity transfer as a time-management strategy for people overlapping different roles and, thus, potentially having more time constraints. Conversely, travel time use without transfer seems to be a strategy for decreasing the dislike of travelling. Activity transfer is more likely to occur in passengerised modes (i.e., public transport and car passenger) with favourable travel conditions (e.g., seat availability) and less likely to occur on short journeys. Bringing laptops with an internet connection to the trip is associated with travel time use with and without activity transfer, while smartphones are predictors only of the latter. Importantly, after controlling for other time-use-related latent constructs, polychronicity becomes a weak predictor of travel time use and activity transfer, suggesting a potential omitted variable bias in previous research. By unveiling fundamental aspects of travel time use, our results have significant implications for transport practice, including public transport investments, long-distance travel modes, and passenger vehicle automation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信