Fractional CO2 Laser for Pediatric Hypertrophic Scars: Lessons Learned from a Prematurely Terminated Split-Scar Trial.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sarthak Sinha, Altay Baykan, Karen Hulin, Doug Baron, Vincent Gabriel, Frankie O G Fraulin
{"title":"Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser for Pediatric Hypertrophic Scars: Lessons Learned from a Prematurely Terminated Split-Scar Trial.","authors":"Sarthak Sinha, Altay Baykan, Karen Hulin, Doug Baron, Vincent Gabriel, Frankie O G Fraulin","doi":"10.3390/ebj6010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing hypertrophic scar (HTS) interventions is challenging because scars continue to undergo dynamic changes. A split-scar design can distinguish treatment effects from natural HTS evolution. Despite promising reports of ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> lasers (AFCO<sub>2</sub>Ls) for HTS, split-scar evidence, particularly in pediatric scars, remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the feasibility of a split-scar design in assessing AFCO<sub>2</sub>L's impact on pediatric HTS and to identify potential trends in treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initially designed as a prospective single-center split-scar randomized controlled trial, our study transitioned to a feasibility trial due to recruitment challenges. Pediatric patients aged 1-17 years with HTS suitable for split-scar evaluation received three AFCO<sub>2</sub>L treatments at 6-8-week intervals, with outcomes assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), SCAR-Q, and Cutometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment was limited by COVID-19 restrictions, concerns about general anesthesia for split-scar treatment, and low interest in divided-scar interventions, resulting in only 6 participants with 9 scars enrolled, far below the target sample size of 44. This small heterogeneous sample precluded meaningful clinical outcome analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our feasibility trial highlights challenges in conducting rigorous pediatric HTS studies and the need for careful interpretation of evidence due to potential publication bias. Future trials should focus on tailored recruitment and comprehensive reporting to improve feasibility and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj6010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing hypertrophic scar (HTS) interventions is challenging because scars continue to undergo dynamic changes. A split-scar design can distinguish treatment effects from natural HTS evolution. Despite promising reports of ablative fractional CO2 lasers (AFCO2Ls) for HTS, split-scar evidence, particularly in pediatric scars, remains limited.

Objective: To explore the feasibility of a split-scar design in assessing AFCO2L's impact on pediatric HTS and to identify potential trends in treatment outcomes.

Methods: Initially designed as a prospective single-center split-scar randomized controlled trial, our study transitioned to a feasibility trial due to recruitment challenges. Pediatric patients aged 1-17 years with HTS suitable for split-scar evaluation received three AFCO2L treatments at 6-8-week intervals, with outcomes assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), SCAR-Q, and Cutometer.

Results: Recruitment was limited by COVID-19 restrictions, concerns about general anesthesia for split-scar treatment, and low interest in divided-scar interventions, resulting in only 6 participants with 9 scars enrolled, far below the target sample size of 44. This small heterogeneous sample precluded meaningful clinical outcome analysis.

Conclusions: Our feasibility trial highlights challenges in conducting rigorous pediatric HTS studies and the need for careful interpretation of evidence due to potential publication bias. Future trials should focus on tailored recruitment and comprehensive reporting to improve feasibility and reliability.

分数CO2激光治疗儿童增生性疤痕:从过早终止的分裂疤痕试验中获得的经验教训。
背景:评估肥厚性疤痕(HTS)干预是具有挑战性的,因为疤痕持续经历动态变化。分裂疤痕设计可以区分治疗效果与自然HTS演变。尽管有关于烧蚀分数CO2激光(AFCO2Ls)治疗HTS的报道很有希望,但分裂疤痕的证据,特别是儿童疤痕的证据仍然有限。目的:探讨裂疤设计评估AFCO2L对儿童HTS影响的可行性,并确定治疗结果的潜在趋势。方法:最初设计为前瞻性单中心裂疤随机对照试验,由于招募挑战,我们的研究转变为可行性试验。1-17岁的HTS儿童患者适合进行分裂疤痕评估,每隔6-8周接受3次AFCO2L治疗,使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)、Scar - q和cumeter评估结果。结果:受COVID-19限制、对劈裂疤痕治疗全麻的担忧以及对劈裂疤痕干预的低兴趣等因素的限制,招募受到限制,导致只有6名参与者招募了9个疤痕,远低于44个目标样本量。这个小的异质样本排除了有意义的临床结果分析。结论:我们的可行性试验强调了开展严格的儿科HTS研究的挑战,以及由于潜在的发表偏倚而需要仔细解释证据。未来的试验应侧重于量身定制的招募和全面的报告,以提高可行性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信