Alberto Pereira Ferraz, Cristiano Faria Pisani, Esteban Wisnivesky Rocca Rivarola, Tan Chen Wu, Francisco Carlos da Costa Darrieux, Rafael Alvarenga Scanavacca, Muhieddine Omar Chokr, Carina Abigail Hardy, Sissy Lara de Melo, Denise Tessariol Hachul, Beatriz Hachul de Campos, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca
{"title":"Esophageal Protection Strategies for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparative Results of Consecutive Endoscopic Evaluation.","authors":"Alberto Pereira Ferraz, Cristiano Faria Pisani, Esteban Wisnivesky Rocca Rivarola, Tan Chen Wu, Francisco Carlos da Costa Darrieux, Rafael Alvarenga Scanavacca, Muhieddine Omar Chokr, Carina Abigail Hardy, Sissy Lara de Melo, Denise Tessariol Hachul, Beatriz Hachul de Campos, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca","doi":"10.36660/abc.20230913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial-esophageal fistula following AF ablation remains a concern. There is no standardized approach to minimize its risk and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present the seven-year experience of a systematic endoscopic surveillance of esophageal injury after AF catheter ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective single center registry of systematic endoscopic evaluation after AF ablation in consecutive procedures performed from 2016 to 2022. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>823 AF ablation with controlled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were analyzed. Most patients (n=588, 71.4%) were male, 575 (69.9%) had paroxysmal AF. Esophageal temperature monitoring was performed using a single sensor in 310 patients (40.3%) and a multi-sensor probe in 306 (39.8%). Lesions were presented in 217 EGD (26.5%): hematoma-ecchymosis in 27 (3.3%), erythema in 14 (1.7%), erosion in 78 (9.5%) and ulcer in 67 (8.2%) patients. No esophageal protective strategy was associated with more ulcers, except the use of 8mm tip-catheter (14.7% of ulcers with 8mm tip catheter vs 6.7% with other catheters, p = 0.001). Thermal lesions were early detected and treated. Most lesions were considered healed at endoscopy, but one patient who underwent pulmonary vein isolation with an 8m tip catheter had esophageal fistula, treated successfully with endoscopic metal clip and endoloop technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of esophageal lesions at routine EGD following AF ablation is high, although in most of the cases they heal spontaneously. Patients who underwent ablation with the 8mm tip catheter had more severe thermal lesions. Early esophagus endoscopy may help the diagnosis of early-stage lesions and the prevention of fistula formation after AF ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 3","pages":"e20230913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Atrial-esophageal fistula following AF ablation remains a concern. There is no standardized approach to minimize its risk and morbidity.
Objective: To present the seven-year experience of a systematic endoscopic surveillance of esophageal injury after AF catheter ablation.
Methods: This is a retrospective single center registry of systematic endoscopic evaluation after AF ablation in consecutive procedures performed from 2016 to 2022. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: 823 AF ablation with controlled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were analyzed. Most patients (n=588, 71.4%) were male, 575 (69.9%) had paroxysmal AF. Esophageal temperature monitoring was performed using a single sensor in 310 patients (40.3%) and a multi-sensor probe in 306 (39.8%). Lesions were presented in 217 EGD (26.5%): hematoma-ecchymosis in 27 (3.3%), erythema in 14 (1.7%), erosion in 78 (9.5%) and ulcer in 67 (8.2%) patients. No esophageal protective strategy was associated with more ulcers, except the use of 8mm tip-catheter (14.7% of ulcers with 8mm tip catheter vs 6.7% with other catheters, p = 0.001). Thermal lesions were early detected and treated. Most lesions were considered healed at endoscopy, but one patient who underwent pulmonary vein isolation with an 8m tip catheter had esophageal fistula, treated successfully with endoscopic metal clip and endoloop technique.
Conclusion: The incidence of esophageal lesions at routine EGD following AF ablation is high, although in most of the cases they heal spontaneously. Patients who underwent ablation with the 8mm tip catheter had more severe thermal lesions. Early esophagus endoscopy may help the diagnosis of early-stage lesions and the prevention of fistula formation after AF ablation.