Esophageal Protection Strategies for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparative Results of Consecutive Endoscopic Evaluation.

IF 1.9
Alberto Pereira Ferraz, Cristiano Faria Pisani, Esteban Wisnivesky Rocca Rivarola, Tan Chen Wu, Francisco Carlos da Costa Darrieux, Rafael Alvarenga Scanavacca, Muhieddine Omar Chokr, Carina Abigail Hardy, Sissy Lara de Melo, Denise Tessariol Hachul, Beatriz Hachul de Campos, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca
{"title":"Esophageal Protection Strategies for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparative Results of Consecutive Endoscopic Evaluation.","authors":"Alberto Pereira Ferraz, Cristiano Faria Pisani, Esteban Wisnivesky Rocca Rivarola, Tan Chen Wu, Francisco Carlos da Costa Darrieux, Rafael Alvarenga Scanavacca, Muhieddine Omar Chokr, Carina Abigail Hardy, Sissy Lara de Melo, Denise Tessariol Hachul, Beatriz Hachul de Campos, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca","doi":"10.36660/abc.20230913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial-esophageal fistula following AF ablation remains a concern. There is no standardized approach to minimize its risk and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present the seven-year experience of a systematic endoscopic surveillance of esophageal injury after AF catheter ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective single center registry of systematic endoscopic evaluation after AF ablation in consecutive procedures performed from 2016 to 2022. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>823 AF ablation with controlled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were analyzed. Most patients (n=588, 71.4%) were male, 575 (69.9%) had paroxysmal AF. Esophageal temperature monitoring was performed using a single sensor in 310 patients (40.3%) and a multi-sensor probe in 306 (39.8%). Lesions were presented in 217 EGD (26.5%): hematoma-ecchymosis in 27 (3.3%), erythema in 14 (1.7%), erosion in 78 (9.5%) and ulcer in 67 (8.2%) patients. No esophageal protective strategy was associated with more ulcers, except the use of 8mm tip-catheter (14.7% of ulcers with 8mm tip catheter vs 6.7% with other catheters, p = 0.001). Thermal lesions were early detected and treated. Most lesions were considered healed at endoscopy, but one patient who underwent pulmonary vein isolation with an 8m tip catheter had esophageal fistula, treated successfully with endoscopic metal clip and endoloop technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of esophageal lesions at routine EGD following AF ablation is high, although in most of the cases they heal spontaneously. Patients who underwent ablation with the 8mm tip catheter had more severe thermal lesions. Early esophagus endoscopy may help the diagnosis of early-stage lesions and the prevention of fistula formation after AF ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 3","pages":"e20230913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial-esophageal fistula following AF ablation remains a concern. There is no standardized approach to minimize its risk and morbidity.

Objective: To present the seven-year experience of a systematic endoscopic surveillance of esophageal injury after AF catheter ablation.

Methods: This is a retrospective single center registry of systematic endoscopic evaluation after AF ablation in consecutive procedures performed from 2016 to 2022. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: 823 AF ablation with controlled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were analyzed. Most patients (n=588, 71.4%) were male, 575 (69.9%) had paroxysmal AF. Esophageal temperature monitoring was performed using a single sensor in 310 patients (40.3%) and a multi-sensor probe in 306 (39.8%). Lesions were presented in 217 EGD (26.5%): hematoma-ecchymosis in 27 (3.3%), erythema in 14 (1.7%), erosion in 78 (9.5%) and ulcer in 67 (8.2%) patients. No esophageal protective strategy was associated with more ulcers, except the use of 8mm tip-catheter (14.7% of ulcers with 8mm tip catheter vs 6.7% with other catheters, p = 0.001). Thermal lesions were early detected and treated. Most lesions were considered healed at endoscopy, but one patient who underwent pulmonary vein isolation with an 8m tip catheter had esophageal fistula, treated successfully with endoscopic metal clip and endoloop technique.

Conclusion: The incidence of esophageal lesions at routine EGD following AF ablation is high, although in most of the cases they heal spontaneously. Patients who underwent ablation with the 8mm tip catheter had more severe thermal lesions. Early esophagus endoscopy may help the diagnosis of early-stage lesions and the prevention of fistula formation after AF ablation.

房颤消融的食管保护策略:连续内镜评估的比较结果。
背景:房颤消融后的房食管瘘仍然是一个值得关注的问题。没有标准化的方法来减少其风险和发病率。目的:介绍7年来对房颤导管消融后食管损伤进行系统内镜监测的经验。方法:这是一项回顾性单中心注册研究,对2016年至2022年连续房颤消融手术后进行系统内镜评估。结果:分析823例食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)下AF消融的p值。大多数患者(588例,71.4%)为男性,575例(69.9%)为阵发性房颤。310例(40.3%)患者使用单传感器进行食管温度监测,306例(39.8%)患者使用多传感器探头。217例(26.5%)出现病变:血肿淤斑27例(3.3%),红斑14例(1.7%),糜烂78例(9.5%),溃疡67例(8.2%)。除了使用8mm尖端导管外,没有食管保护策略与更多溃疡相关(使用8mm尖端导管的溃疡发生率为14.7%,而使用其他导管的溃疡发生率为6.7%,p = 0.001)。早期发现并治疗热病变。大多数病变在内镜下被认为已经愈合,但有1例患者采用8m尖端导管进行肺静脉隔离后出现食管瘘,经内镜下金属夹和内环技术治疗成功。结论:房颤消融后食管病变在常规EGD中的发生率较高,但多数情况下可自愈。采用8mm尖端导管消融的患者有更严重的热损伤。早期食管内镜检查有助于早期病变的诊断和预防房颤消融后瘘的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信