Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S482233
Xiaoying Zhao, Lihua Zhao, Guangyao Li, Wenfeng Yang, Huili Wang, Yanmeng Yang
{"title":"Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xiaoying Zhao, Lihua Zhao, Guangyao Li, Wenfeng Yang, Huili Wang, Yanmeng Yang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S482233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of a cognitive load theory (CLT)-based WeChat training platform on reducing the barriers to reporting adverse events among clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 400 clinical nurses from a tertiary general hospital were randomized into experimental and control groups (200 each). The experimental group used the CLT-based WeChat training platform, whereas the control group received conventional training for nursing adverse events. Both interventions lasted 12 weeks. Barriers to reporting, reporting awareness, intention, and habit scores were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the dropouts, 197 experimental and 196 control participants completed the study. In the experimental group, the total scores for barriers to reporting adverse events and in the dimensions of punitive culture, reporting process, and reporting significance scores were 93.87 ± 6.85, 48.88 ± 4.68, 21.53 ± 4.15, and 23.40 ± 2.11, respectively, whereas the control group corresponding scores were 72.07 ± 6.67, 34.20 ± 6.02, 20.06 ± 3.25, and 17.36 ± 2.92, respectively. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores and reporting significance (P all < 0.01). Additionally, the experimental group had significantly higher scores for safety event reporting awareness, intention, and habits than those in the control group (P < 0.01). When responding to nursing adverse events of various severity, the only exception to statistically significant differences between the groups was in \"reporting to the head nurse\" for medium-severity incidents (P = 0.302). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher rates of \"submitting an adverse event report\", \"reporting to the head nurse\", and \"discussing with colleagues\" than those in the control group regardless of the severity of the adverse event (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that the CLT-based WeChat training platform model can effectively reduce the level of barriers to adverse event reporting by nurses, enhance nurses' adverse event reporting awareness, intention, and promote improvement in nurses' adverse event reporting behaviors, thereby improving the quality of nursing care and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"947-961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S482233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of a cognitive load theory (CLT)-based WeChat training platform on reducing the barriers to reporting adverse events among clinical nurses.

Methods: In total, 400 clinical nurses from a tertiary general hospital were randomized into experimental and control groups (200 each). The experimental group used the CLT-based WeChat training platform, whereas the control group received conventional training for nursing adverse events. Both interventions lasted 12 weeks. Barriers to reporting, reporting awareness, intention, and habit scores were compared between the groups.

Results: After the dropouts, 197 experimental and 196 control participants completed the study. In the experimental group, the total scores for barriers to reporting adverse events and in the dimensions of punitive culture, reporting process, and reporting significance scores were 93.87 ± 6.85, 48.88 ± 4.68, 21.53 ± 4.15, and 23.40 ± 2.11, respectively, whereas the control group corresponding scores were 72.07 ± 6.67, 34.20 ± 6.02, 20.06 ± 3.25, and 17.36 ± 2.92, respectively. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores and reporting significance (P all < 0.01). Additionally, the experimental group had significantly higher scores for safety event reporting awareness, intention, and habits than those in the control group (P < 0.01). When responding to nursing adverse events of various severity, the only exception to statistically significant differences between the groups was in "reporting to the head nurse" for medium-severity incidents (P = 0.302). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher rates of "submitting an adverse event report", "reporting to the head nurse", and "discussing with colleagues" than those in the control group regardless of the severity of the adverse event (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study confirmed that the CLT-based WeChat training platform model can effectively reduce the level of barriers to adverse event reporting by nurses, enhance nurses' adverse event reporting awareness, intention, and promote improvement in nurses' adverse event reporting behaviors, thereby improving the quality of nursing care and patient safety.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信