Development and Validation of the DA3 Scale for Assessing Depression, Anxiety, and Apathy in Older Adults.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Deirdre M O'Shea, Lun-Ching Chang, Gregory Gibbs, Conor B Galvin, Michael J Kleiman, James E Galvin
{"title":"Development and Validation of the DA3 Scale for Assessing Depression, Anxiety, and Apathy in Older Adults.","authors":"Deirdre M O'Shea, Lun-Ching Chang, Gregory Gibbs, Conor B Galvin, Michael J Kleiman, James E Galvin","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the Depression, Anxiety, and Apathy (DA3) scale for assessing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and apathy in community-dwelling mid- and late-life adults with and without cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional psychometric validation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based longitudinal study of brain health.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 252 participants (mean age, 68.8 ± 9.4 years; 68.5% women; 71.3% non-Hispanic White; 66.8% cognitively normal) completed the study.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The DA3 scale was compared with established measures of mood including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Apathy Scale (AS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ8), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Psychometric properties were assessed using reliability and validity measures, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Mokken scale analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DA3 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.670-0.781). CFA supported a three-factor model corresponding to distinct depression, anxiety, and apathy dimensions, with excellent goodness-of-fit. Mokken analysis confirmed acceptable-to-strong scalability (H coefficients, 0.36-0.54). The DA3 subscales demonstrated strong convergent validity with established measures (e.g., HADS, AS, GAD-7, and PHQ-8). Cut-off scores of five on each subscale achieved optimal agreement with gold standard measures. Performance of the DA3 was consistent across sociodemographic, neuropsychological, and cognitive subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DA3 is a unitary, brief, valid, and reliable tool for assessing depression, anxiety, and apathy in community-dwelling older adults, including those with cognitive impairment. Its strong psychometric properties support its use in both clinical and research settings. Future studies should examine its longitudinal utility to better understand its role in tracking mood symptoms over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2025.03.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To validate the Depression, Anxiety, and Apathy (DA3) scale for assessing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and apathy in community-dwelling mid- and late-life adults with and without cognitive impairment.

Design: Cross-sectional psychometric validation study.

Setting: Community-based longitudinal study of brain health.

Participants: A total of 252 participants (mean age, 68.8 ± 9.4 years; 68.5% women; 71.3% non-Hispanic White; 66.8% cognitively normal) completed the study.

Measurements: The DA3 scale was compared with established measures of mood including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Apathy Scale (AS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ8), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Psychometric properties were assessed using reliability and validity measures, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Mokken scale analysis.

Results: The DA3 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.670-0.781). CFA supported a three-factor model corresponding to distinct depression, anxiety, and apathy dimensions, with excellent goodness-of-fit. Mokken analysis confirmed acceptable-to-strong scalability (H coefficients, 0.36-0.54). The DA3 subscales demonstrated strong convergent validity with established measures (e.g., HADS, AS, GAD-7, and PHQ-8). Cut-off scores of five on each subscale achieved optimal agreement with gold standard measures. Performance of the DA3 was consistent across sociodemographic, neuropsychological, and cognitive subgroups.

Conclusions: The DA3 is a unitary, brief, valid, and reliable tool for assessing depression, anxiety, and apathy in community-dwelling older adults, including those with cognitive impairment. Its strong psychometric properties support its use in both clinical and research settings. Future studies should examine its longitudinal utility to better understand its role in tracking mood symptoms over time.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信