Low-Dose Aspirin is Safe and Effective for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Femoral Neck Fracture.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Amy Y Zhao, Alex Gu, Aribah Shah, Avilash Das, Philip M Parel, James N Debritz, Robert S Sterling
{"title":"Low-Dose Aspirin is Safe and Effective for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Femoral Neck Fracture.","authors":"Amy Y Zhao, Alex Gu, Aribah Shah, Avilash Das, Philip M Parel, James N Debritz, Robert S Sterling","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although patients who undergo arthroplasty for hip fractures are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), current guidelines do not specify the optimal VTE prophylactic agent. Recent evidence demonstrates that aspirin (ASA) may be safe and effective for VTE prevention in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of low-dose ASA (81 mg) compared to non-ASA agents after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36,576 patients who underwent arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture from January 2012 through December 2023 were identified in a national database. Patients were stratified by baseline VTE risk into high-risk and standard-risk groups and further categorized based on the type of VTE prophylaxis received - low-dose ASA only or non-ASA prophylaxis only. Rates and odds of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and adverse events, including bleeding, blood transfusion requirements, and emergency department visits, were assessed in the 90-day postoperative period for propensity-matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to non-ASA prophylaxis, use of low-dose ASA only was associated with significantly lower odds of DVT in both high-risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30 to 0.69) and standard-risk (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.76) groups, and lower odds of PE in high-risk patients (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.55). There were no significant differences in odds of PE in standard-risk patients (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.61). Low-dose ASA was associated with lower odds of bleeding events, blood transfusion requirements, and emergency department visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of low-dose ASA is safe and effective in preventing VTE in patients undergoing arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. As this population is at higher risk of mortality, prospective studies comparing VTE prophylaxis regimens are necessary to further improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although patients who undergo arthroplasty for hip fractures are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), current guidelines do not specify the optimal VTE prophylactic agent. Recent evidence demonstrates that aspirin (ASA) may be safe and effective for VTE prevention in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of low-dose ASA (81 mg) compared to non-ASA agents after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Methods: A total of 36,576 patients who underwent arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture from January 2012 through December 2023 were identified in a national database. Patients were stratified by baseline VTE risk into high-risk and standard-risk groups and further categorized based on the type of VTE prophylaxis received - low-dose ASA only or non-ASA prophylaxis only. Rates and odds of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and adverse events, including bleeding, blood transfusion requirements, and emergency department visits, were assessed in the 90-day postoperative period for propensity-matched cohorts.

Results: Compared to non-ASA prophylaxis, use of low-dose ASA only was associated with significantly lower odds of DVT in both high-risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30 to 0.69) and standard-risk (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.76) groups, and lower odds of PE in high-risk patients (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.55). There were no significant differences in odds of PE in standard-risk patients (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.61). Low-dose ASA was associated with lower odds of bleeding events, blood transfusion requirements, and emergency department visits.

Conclusions: Use of low-dose ASA is safe and effective in preventing VTE in patients undergoing arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. As this population is at higher risk of mortality, prospective studies comparing VTE prophylaxis regimens are necessary to further improve clinical outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信