How Does the Novice Become the Expert? An Instrumental Case Study of Procedural Educators.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005917
Ilana Roberts Krumm, Adrienne Strait, Lekshmi Santhosh
{"title":"How Does the Novice Become the Expert? An Instrumental Case Study of Procedural Educators.","authors":"Ilana Roberts Krumm, Adrienne Strait, Lekshmi Santhosh","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The classic paradigm of procedural education in medical training has involved trainees learning and performing invasive bedside procedures and subsequently teaching these procedures to more junior trainees. Many existing resident-as-teacher curricula focus on cognitive domains; there has been a lack of literature examining the transition from learner to teacher in procedural education. This hypothesis-generating instrumental case study explored how expert procedural educators transitioned from novice procedural educators to experts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A constructivist approach with semistructured interviews was used to explore the individual narratives and experiences of faculty of the Hospitalist Procedure Service at the University of California San Francisco as they reflected on their journey from learners to teachers, focusing on the faculty of the hospitalist procedure team at the University of California San Francisco. All 12 Hospitalist Procedure Service faculty members received invitations to be interviewed, and 9 agreed to participate. Interviews were conducted between July and October 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 9 interviews created a rich and complex picture of the individual experiences and perceptions of procedural teaching. The faculty members varied in experience, ranging from 2 years on the procedure service faculty to more than 15 years of experience. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: methods for building teaching skills, tools that facilitate further educator growth, essential behaviors of effective educators, and common challenges. Inductive thematic analysis revealed trial and error as a major means of building procedural pedagogy and the use of precise communication as a crucial skill to manage learner cognitive load and the emotional challenges associated with learning and teaching procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of precise communication as a tool for both educator and learner to navigate the complexities of procedural teaching highlights the essential role of clear instruction and feedback in the learning process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":"100 4","pages":"453-458"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The classic paradigm of procedural education in medical training has involved trainees learning and performing invasive bedside procedures and subsequently teaching these procedures to more junior trainees. Many existing resident-as-teacher curricula focus on cognitive domains; there has been a lack of literature examining the transition from learner to teacher in procedural education. This hypothesis-generating instrumental case study explored how expert procedural educators transitioned from novice procedural educators to experts.

Method: A constructivist approach with semistructured interviews was used to explore the individual narratives and experiences of faculty of the Hospitalist Procedure Service at the University of California San Francisco as they reflected on their journey from learners to teachers, focusing on the faculty of the hospitalist procedure team at the University of California San Francisco. All 12 Hospitalist Procedure Service faculty members received invitations to be interviewed, and 9 agreed to participate. Interviews were conducted between July and October 2023.

Results: The 9 interviews created a rich and complex picture of the individual experiences and perceptions of procedural teaching. The faculty members varied in experience, ranging from 2 years on the procedure service faculty to more than 15 years of experience. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: methods for building teaching skills, tools that facilitate further educator growth, essential behaviors of effective educators, and common challenges. Inductive thematic analysis revealed trial and error as a major means of building procedural pedagogy and the use of precise communication as a crucial skill to manage learner cognitive load and the emotional challenges associated with learning and teaching procedures.

Conclusions: The use of precise communication as a tool for both educator and learner to navigate the complexities of procedural teaching highlights the essential role of clear instruction and feedback in the learning process.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信