Meaningful Patient Participation in Health Care Education: A Theoretically Informed Study Exploring Boundaries and Identities.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005919
Amber Bennett-Weston, Simon Gay, Elizabeth S Anderson
{"title":"Meaningful Patient Participation in Health Care Education: A Theoretically Informed Study Exploring Boundaries and Identities.","authors":"Amber Bennett-Weston, Simon Gay, Elizabeth S Anderson","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>After recent policy and practice changes, health care schools are expected to involve patients as partners in the management, design, and delivery of professional curricula. However, what these partnerships mean for academic communities and the processes needed to support them are not yet understood. This study examines what involving patients as partners within an academic community means for key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative case study design with a social constructivist philosophical stance was used. Communities of practice served as the theoretical framework. Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and educators from the University of Leicester between November 2021 and May 2022. Focus groups were held with penultimate-year students. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by communities of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 40 participants. Ten patients and 10 educators participated in 40- to 60-minute interviews. Twenty students participated in 1 of 5 focus group discussions lasting 30 to 50 minutes. Two overarching themes were reported: \"boundaries as (permeable) barriers to participation\" and \"identity as an interpretive lens.\" Boundaries among patients, educators, and students can hinder patients' meaningful involvement in health care education. Boundaries are marked through differences in knowledge, a lack of shared vision, and a lack of trust in patients. Patients, educators, and students have separate distinct identities. They experience tensions of identity when they meet across boundaries. These tensions reveal insights into the construction of the typical patient identity in health care education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying communities of practice illuminated boundary and identity issues that patients, educators, and students experience when patients are involved in health care education. Health care schools should develop comprehensive training for patients, provide faculty development regarding patient involvement, support students to trust in patient teachers, and embed a distinctive strand of patient involvement across health care curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":"100 4","pages":"466-474"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: After recent policy and practice changes, health care schools are expected to involve patients as partners in the management, design, and delivery of professional curricula. However, what these partnerships mean for academic communities and the processes needed to support them are not yet understood. This study examines what involving patients as partners within an academic community means for key stakeholders.

Method: A qualitative case study design with a social constructivist philosophical stance was used. Communities of practice served as the theoretical framework. Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and educators from the University of Leicester between November 2021 and May 2022. Focus groups were held with penultimate-year students. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by communities of practice.

Results: The sample comprised 40 participants. Ten patients and 10 educators participated in 40- to 60-minute interviews. Twenty students participated in 1 of 5 focus group discussions lasting 30 to 50 minutes. Two overarching themes were reported: "boundaries as (permeable) barriers to participation" and "identity as an interpretive lens." Boundaries among patients, educators, and students can hinder patients' meaningful involvement in health care education. Boundaries are marked through differences in knowledge, a lack of shared vision, and a lack of trust in patients. Patients, educators, and students have separate distinct identities. They experience tensions of identity when they meet across boundaries. These tensions reveal insights into the construction of the typical patient identity in health care education.

Conclusions: Applying communities of practice illuminated boundary and identity issues that patients, educators, and students experience when patients are involved in health care education. Health care schools should develop comprehensive training for patients, provide faculty development regarding patient involvement, support students to trust in patient teachers, and embed a distinctive strand of patient involvement across health care curricula.

有意义的病人参与卫生保健教育:一项探索边界和身份的理论研究。
目的:在最近的政策和实践变化之后,预计卫生保健学校将患者作为合作伙伴参与专业课程的管理、设计和交付。然而,这些伙伴关系对学术界意味着什么以及支持它们所需的过程尚不清楚。本研究考察了将患者作为合作伙伴纳入学术社区对关键利益相关者的意义。方法:采用社会建构主义哲学立场的定性个案研究设计。实践共同体作为理论框架。在2021年11月至2022年5月期间,对莱斯特大学的患者和教育工作者进行了半结构化访谈。与二年级学生进行了焦点小组讨论。数据分析采用反身性专题分析,由实践社区提供信息。结果:样本共40人。10名患者和10名教育工作者参加了40至60分钟的访谈。20名学生参加了5个焦点小组讨论中的1个,持续30到50分钟。报告的两个主要主题是:“边界作为参与的(可渗透的)障碍”和“身份作为解释的镜头”。患者、教育者和学生之间的界限可能会阻碍患者有意义地参与卫生保健教育。界限是通过知识差异、缺乏共同愿景和对患者缺乏信任来标记的。患者、教育者和学生有着不同的身份。当他们跨越国界相遇时,他们会经历身份的紧张。这些紧张关系揭示了对医疗保健教育中典型患者身份建构的见解。结论:应用实践社区阐明了当患者参与卫生保健教育时,患者、教育者和学生所经历的边界和身份问题。卫生保健学校应该为患者提供全面的培训,提供有关患者参与的教师发展,支持学生信任患者教师,并在卫生保健课程中嵌入患者参与的独特链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信