Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck
{"title":"Comparison of single- versus multi-drug treatment for intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in children with retinoblastoma.","authors":"Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck","doi":"10.1177/15910199251324028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251324028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251324028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.
期刊介绍:
Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...