A Comparison of Pollination Efficiency Between Wild Bumble Bees and Introduced Honey Bees on Polygonatum cyrtonema.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Ju Tang, Xiang-Xiang Ge, Yu-Jie Xu, Yu Zhang, Jian-Wen Shao, Xiao-Hong Li
{"title":"A Comparison of Pollination Efficiency Between Wild Bumble Bees and Introduced Honey Bees on <i>Polygonatum cyrtonema</i>.","authors":"Ju Tang, Xiang-Xiang Ge, Yu-Jie Xu, Yu Zhang, Jian-Wen Shao, Xiao-Hong Li","doi":"10.3390/biology14030276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To clarify the pollination contributions of introduced honey bees and native wild bees, we compared their pollination efficiency on a perennial herb, <i>Polygonatum cyrtonema</i> Hua. The flower's traits and bees' body traits were measured to quantify the mechanical fit between the bee species and flower. Pollen removal and deposition per visit, visit frequency, and visit duration per flower were investigated. The results show that both native bumble bees (worker bees of <i>Bombus trifasciatus</i> Smith) and introduced honey bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) are effective pollinators, but bumble bees play a more important role in pollination, due to their higher visit frequency and slightly higher pollen transfer efficiency. The bumble bees removed and deposited significantly more pollen grains per visit than the honey bees (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The faster visiting speed and shorter visit duration of the bumble bees, combined with their larger body size and longer proboscises, may have contributed to their higher pollen transfer efficiency. The pollination success of <i>P. cyrtonema</i> depends on its pollinators. This study is the first to report on the pollination efficiency of floral visitors on <i>P. cyrtonema</i>. Our findings highlight the importance of conserving native bumble bee populations to ensure the reproductive success of <i>P. cyrtonema</i>. Future studies should focus on their management to minimize potential disruptions to native pollination contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14030276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To clarify the pollination contributions of introduced honey bees and native wild bees, we compared their pollination efficiency on a perennial herb, Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. The flower's traits and bees' body traits were measured to quantify the mechanical fit between the bee species and flower. Pollen removal and deposition per visit, visit frequency, and visit duration per flower were investigated. The results show that both native bumble bees (worker bees of Bombus trifasciatus Smith) and introduced honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are effective pollinators, but bumble bees play a more important role in pollination, due to their higher visit frequency and slightly higher pollen transfer efficiency. The bumble bees removed and deposited significantly more pollen grains per visit than the honey bees (both p < 0.001). The faster visiting speed and shorter visit duration of the bumble bees, combined with their larger body size and longer proboscises, may have contributed to their higher pollen transfer efficiency. The pollination success of P. cyrtonema depends on its pollinators. This study is the first to report on the pollination efficiency of floral visitors on P. cyrtonema. Our findings highlight the importance of conserving native bumble bee populations to ensure the reproductive success of P. cyrtonema. Future studies should focus on their management to minimize potential disruptions to native pollination contribution.

野生大黄蜂与引种蜜蜂对黄精授粉效率的比较。
为了明确引进蜜蜂和本地野生蜜蜂对多年生草本植物黄精的授粉贡献,我们比较了它们对黄精的授粉效率。通过测量花的性状和蜜蜂的身体性状来量化蜜蜂与花的机械契合度。研究了每次访花的花粉去除和沉积、访花频率和访花时间。结果表明,本地大黄蜂(Bombus trifasciatus Smith的工蜂)和引进蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)都是有效的传粉者,但大黄蜂的访花频率更高,传粉效率略高,在传粉中起着更重要的作用。每次访问时,大黄蜂清除和沉积的花粉粒明显多于蜜蜂(p < 0.001)。大黄蜂更快的访问速度和更短的访问时间,加上它们更大的体型和更长的喙,可能是它们更高的花粉传递效率的原因。胞丝草的传粉成功与否取决于其传粉者。本研究首次报道了花访花植物对胞浆寄主的传粉效率。我们的研究结果强调了保护本地大黄蜂种群的重要性,以确保胞膜假单胞虫的繁殖成功。未来的研究应侧重于它们的管理,以尽量减少对本地授粉贡献的潜在破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology-Basel
Biology-Basel Biological Science-Biological Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1618
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信