Endophytic Diversity in Vitis vinifera with Different Vineyard Managements and Vitis sylvestris Populations from Northern Italy: A Comparative Study of Culture-Dependent and Amplicon Sequencing Methods.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Simona Pizzi, Angela Conti, Alessandra Di Canito, Debora Casagrande Pierantoni, Roberto Foschino, Mathabatha Evodia Setati, Ileana Vigentini
{"title":"Endophytic Diversity in <i>Vitis vinifera</i> with Different Vineyard Managements and <i>Vitis sylvestris</i> Populations from Northern Italy: A Comparative Study of Culture-Dependent and Amplicon Sequencing Methods.","authors":"Simona Pizzi, Angela Conti, Alessandra Di Canito, Debora Casagrande Pierantoni, Roberto Foschino, Mathabatha Evodia Setati, Ileana Vigentini","doi":"10.3390/biology14030293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the endophytic microbial populations associated with wild and domesticated grapevines using both culture-based and culture-independent methods. Through culture-based methods, 148 endophytes were identified. The dominant fungal species included <i>Aureobasidium pullulans</i>, <i>Alternaria alternata</i>, and <i>Cladosporium allicinum</i>, while predominant bacterial species were <i>Ralstonia pikettii</i>, <i>Nocardia niigatensis</i>, and <i>Sphingomonas echinoides</i>. Culture-independent methods employed metagenomic techniques to explore microbial biodiversity, focusing on targeted amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA as well as fungal ITS and 26S rRNA gene regions. The main bacterial species identified included <i>Halomonas</i> sp., <i>Sphingomonas</i> sp. and <i>Massilia</i> sp., whereas the fungal population was dominated by <i>Cladosporium</i> sp., <i>Malassezia</i> sp. and <i>Mucor</i> sp. The findings revealed that vineyard management practices did not lead to statistically significant variations in microbial communities. The consistent presence of these genera across all samples suggests that they are stable components of the grapevine endophytic microbiota, remaining relatively unaffected by external environmental factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14030293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the endophytic microbial populations associated with wild and domesticated grapevines using both culture-based and culture-independent methods. Through culture-based methods, 148 endophytes were identified. The dominant fungal species included Aureobasidium pullulans, Alternaria alternata, and Cladosporium allicinum, while predominant bacterial species were Ralstonia pikettii, Nocardia niigatensis, and Sphingomonas echinoides. Culture-independent methods employed metagenomic techniques to explore microbial biodiversity, focusing on targeted amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA as well as fungal ITS and 26S rRNA gene regions. The main bacterial species identified included Halomonas sp., Sphingomonas sp. and Massilia sp., whereas the fungal population was dominated by Cladosporium sp., Malassezia sp. and Mucor sp. The findings revealed that vineyard management practices did not lead to statistically significant variations in microbial communities. The consistent presence of these genera across all samples suggests that they are stable components of the grapevine endophytic microbiota, remaining relatively unaffected by external environmental factors.

不同葡萄园管理和意大利北部葡萄种群的内生多样性:培养依赖和扩增子测序方法的比较研究。
本研究旨在利用基于培养和不依赖培养的方法研究野生和驯化葡萄的内生微生物种群。通过培养法鉴定出148种内生菌。真菌优势种为普鲁兰毛霉、互交霉和大蒜枝孢子菌,细菌优势种为匹克氏拉尔斯顿菌、新革诺卡菌和棘皮鞘单胞菌。非培养方法采用宏基因组技术探索微生物多样性,重点是细菌16S rRNA以及真菌ITS和26S rRNA基因区域的靶向扩增。鉴定出的主要细菌种类为Halomonas sp.、Sphingomonas sp.和Massilia sp.,真菌种群以枝孢菌(Cladosporium sp.)、马拉色菌(Malassezia sp.)和毛霉菌(Mucor sp.)为主。研究结果表明,葡萄园管理方式对微生物群落的影响不显著。这些属在所有样品中的一致存在表明它们是葡萄内生微生物群的稳定组成部分,相对不受外部环境因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology-Basel
Biology-Basel Biological Science-Biological Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1618
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信