Endophytic Diversity in Vitis vinifera with Different Vineyard Managements and Vitis sylvestris Populations from Northern Italy: A Comparative Study of Culture-Dependent and Amplicon Sequencing Methods.
{"title":"Endophytic Diversity in <i>Vitis vinifera</i> with Different Vineyard Managements and <i>Vitis sylvestris</i> Populations from Northern Italy: A Comparative Study of Culture-Dependent and Amplicon Sequencing Methods.","authors":"Simona Pizzi, Angela Conti, Alessandra Di Canito, Debora Casagrande Pierantoni, Roberto Foschino, Mathabatha Evodia Setati, Ileana Vigentini","doi":"10.3390/biology14030293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the endophytic microbial populations associated with wild and domesticated grapevines using both culture-based and culture-independent methods. Through culture-based methods, 148 endophytes were identified. The dominant fungal species included <i>Aureobasidium pullulans</i>, <i>Alternaria alternata</i>, and <i>Cladosporium allicinum</i>, while predominant bacterial species were <i>Ralstonia pikettii</i>, <i>Nocardia niigatensis</i>, and <i>Sphingomonas echinoides</i>. Culture-independent methods employed metagenomic techniques to explore microbial biodiversity, focusing on targeted amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA as well as fungal ITS and 26S rRNA gene regions. The main bacterial species identified included <i>Halomonas</i> sp., <i>Sphingomonas</i> sp. and <i>Massilia</i> sp., whereas the fungal population was dominated by <i>Cladosporium</i> sp., <i>Malassezia</i> sp. and <i>Mucor</i> sp. The findings revealed that vineyard management practices did not lead to statistically significant variations in microbial communities. The consistent presence of these genera across all samples suggests that they are stable components of the grapevine endophytic microbiota, remaining relatively unaffected by external environmental factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14030293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the endophytic microbial populations associated with wild and domesticated grapevines using both culture-based and culture-independent methods. Through culture-based methods, 148 endophytes were identified. The dominant fungal species included Aureobasidium pullulans, Alternaria alternata, and Cladosporium allicinum, while predominant bacterial species were Ralstonia pikettii, Nocardia niigatensis, and Sphingomonas echinoides. Culture-independent methods employed metagenomic techniques to explore microbial biodiversity, focusing on targeted amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA as well as fungal ITS and 26S rRNA gene regions. The main bacterial species identified included Halomonas sp., Sphingomonas sp. and Massilia sp., whereas the fungal population was dominated by Cladosporium sp., Malassezia sp. and Mucor sp. The findings revealed that vineyard management practices did not lead to statistically significant variations in microbial communities. The consistent presence of these genera across all samples suggests that they are stable components of the grapevine endophytic microbiota, remaining relatively unaffected by external environmental factors.
期刊介绍:
Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.