Misconceptions and limited experience with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among fishermen in Western Kenya: a qualitative study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Phoebe Olugo, Holly Nishimura, Marguerite Thorp, Jayne Lewis-Kulzer, Bernard Ayieko, Kawango Agot, Zachary A Kwena, Carol S Camlin, Sarah A Gutin
{"title":"Misconceptions and limited experience with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among fishermen in Western Kenya: a qualitative study.","authors":"Phoebe Olugo, Holly Nishimura, Marguerite Thorp, Jayne Lewis-Kulzer, Bernard Ayieko, Kawango Agot, Zachary A Kwena, Carol S Camlin, Sarah A Gutin","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2480149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective when taken consistently, but its uptake remains low among mobile fishermen in Kenya. This study explored barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in three Lake Victoria beach communities. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 65 fishermen, purposively sampled by community, age and study arm. IDIs and FGDs examined PrEP knowledge, perceptions and experiences and were conducted in Swahili or Dholuo, transcribed and translated into English. Data were analyzed using a framework approach. Most participants were >35 years old (56%), married (83%) and half (48%) had completed primary education or higher. Although most had heard of PrEP, some confused it with post-exposure prophylaxis, and many were unsure of correct dosing and eligibility. Barriers to uptake included anticipated partner conflict, confusion with HIV treatment medications and stigma associated with PrEP use, leading to fear of disclosing use to sexual partners. Facilitators included a preference for PrEP over condoms and its perceived protection in sero-different partnerships. Despite free availability in clinics, misconceptions may hinder uptake. Educational interventions are needed to improve PrEP knowledge and reduce stigma, especially among mobile populations like fishermen.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"728-737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2480149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective when taken consistently, but its uptake remains low among mobile fishermen in Kenya. This study explored barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in three Lake Victoria beach communities. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 65 fishermen, purposively sampled by community, age and study arm. IDIs and FGDs examined PrEP knowledge, perceptions and experiences and were conducted in Swahili or Dholuo, transcribed and translated into English. Data were analyzed using a framework approach. Most participants were >35 years old (56%), married (83%) and half (48%) had completed primary education or higher. Although most had heard of PrEP, some confused it with post-exposure prophylaxis, and many were unsure of correct dosing and eligibility. Barriers to uptake included anticipated partner conflict, confusion with HIV treatment medications and stigma associated with PrEP use, leading to fear of disclosing use to sexual partners. Facilitators included a preference for PrEP over condoms and its perceived protection in sero-different partnerships. Despite free availability in clinics, misconceptions may hinder uptake. Educational interventions are needed to improve PrEP knowledge and reduce stigma, especially among mobile populations like fishermen.

肯尼亚西部渔民对艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的误解和有限经验:一项定性研究
每日口服艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)在持续服用时非常有效,但在肯尼亚的流动渔民中使用率仍然很低。本研究探讨了三个维多利亚湖海滩社区PrEP吸收的障碍和促进因素。我们对65名渔民进行了深入访谈和焦点小组讨论,有目的地按社区、年龄和研究部门进行抽样调查。IDIs和fdd检查了PrEP知识、观念和经验,并以斯瓦希里语或多洛语进行,转录并翻译成英语。使用框架方法分析数据。大多数参与者年龄在35岁左右(56%),已婚(83%),一半(48%)完成了小学或更高的教育。虽然大多数人都听说过PrEP,但有些人将其与暴露后预防混淆,许多人不确定正确的剂量和资格。使用PrEP的障碍包括预期的伴侣冲突、对艾滋病毒治疗药物的混淆以及与使用PrEP相关的耻辱,导致害怕向性伴侣透露使用情况。促进因素包括对PrEP的偏好,而不是避孕套,以及在五种不同的伙伴关系中,PrEP的保护作用。尽管诊所免费提供,但误解可能会阻碍人们接受。需要采取教育干预措施,提高预防措施知识,减少耻辱感,特别是在渔民等流动人口中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信