Misconceptions and limited experience with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among fishermen in Western Kenya: a qualitative study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Phoebe Olugo, Holly Nishimura, Marguerite Thorp, Jayne Lewis-Kulzer, Bernard Ayieko, Kawango Agot, Zachary A Kwena, Carol S Camlin, Sarah A Gutin
{"title":"Misconceptions and limited experience with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among fishermen in Western Kenya: a qualitative study.","authors":"Phoebe Olugo, Holly Nishimura, Marguerite Thorp, Jayne Lewis-Kulzer, Bernard Ayieko, Kawango Agot, Zachary A Kwena, Carol S Camlin, Sarah A Gutin","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2480149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective when taken consistently, but its uptake remains low among mobile fishermen in Kenya. This study explored barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in three Lake Victoria beach communities. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 65 fishermen, purposively sampled by community, age and study arm. IDIs and FGDs examined PrEP knowledge, perceptions and experiences and were conducted in Swahili or Dholuo, transcribed and translated into English. Data were analyzed using a framework approach. Most participants were >35 years old (56%), married (83%) and half (48%) had completed primary education or higher. Although most had heard of PrEP, some confused it with post-exposure prophylaxis, and many were unsure of correct dosing and eligibility. Barriers to uptake included anticipated partner conflict, confusion with HIV treatment medications and stigma associated with PrEP use, leading to fear of disclosing use to sexual partners. Facilitators included a preference for PrEP over condoms and its perceived protection in sero-different partnerships. Despite free availability in clinics, misconceptions may hinder uptake. Educational interventions are needed to improve PrEP knowledge and reduce stigma, especially among mobile populations like fishermen.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2480149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective when taken consistently, but its uptake remains low among mobile fishermen in Kenya. This study explored barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in three Lake Victoria beach communities. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 65 fishermen, purposively sampled by community, age and study arm. IDIs and FGDs examined PrEP knowledge, perceptions and experiences and were conducted in Swahili or Dholuo, transcribed and translated into English. Data were analyzed using a framework approach. Most participants were >35 years old (56%), married (83%) and half (48%) had completed primary education or higher. Although most had heard of PrEP, some confused it with post-exposure prophylaxis, and many were unsure of correct dosing and eligibility. Barriers to uptake included anticipated partner conflict, confusion with HIV treatment medications and stigma associated with PrEP use, leading to fear of disclosing use to sexual partners. Facilitators included a preference for PrEP over condoms and its perceived protection in sero-different partnerships. Despite free availability in clinics, misconceptions may hinder uptake. Educational interventions are needed to improve PrEP knowledge and reduce stigma, especially among mobile populations like fishermen.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信