Concerns regarding deployment of AI-based applications in dentistry - a review.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Abhishek Lal, Ayesha Nooruddin, Fahad Umer
{"title":"Concerns regarding deployment of AI-based applications in dentistry - a review.","authors":"Abhishek Lal, Ayesha Nooruddin, Fahad Umer","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00319-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving technology, with various applications in dentistry including diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. There are various AI-based applications for dental practitioners, however, their real-world evaluation through deployement studies is scarce, as most of the studies are validation studies. This review explores the potential pitfalls of focusing solely on technical performance metrics when evaluating AI-based applications in dentistry while overlooking the importance of clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was performed on PubMed and Scopus while a manual search was conducted on Google Scholar \"Dentistry\", \"Dental\", \"Artificial Intelligence\", \"Deep Learning, \"Machine Learning\", \"Applications\", \"Diagnocat\", \"CephX\", \"Denti.AI\", \"VideaAI\", \"Smile Designer\", \"Overjet\", \"DentalXR.AI\", \"Smilo.AI\", \"Smile.AI\", \"Pearl\", \"AI deployment challenges in dental practice\", \"AI for treatment planning in dentistry\", \"AI in dental imaging\", and \"AI-based diagnosis in dentistry\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The electronic search yielded a total of 34 studies, while 10 additional studies were obtained through a manual search, resulting in a total of 44 studies included in this review.  Among the 44 studies analyzed, 26 studies were retrospective, while 7 studies utilized a comparative design. The remaining studies comprised of 3 observational, 5 validation, 2 cross-sectional, and 1 prospective study. Further to evaluate the identified applications, relevant companies were contacted via email. Only one company's representative responded, offering a limited trial version which was insufficient for evaluating the application's effectiveness. AI technologies may offer lots of benefits for dental practice by enhancing patient-health-based outcomes, however, real-world applications are necessary to ensure its safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work highlights the need for conducting deployment studies for such AI-based dental applications to translate and implement them into dental practice. Collaboration with stakeholders and dental practitioners to assess the use of such applications is of paramount importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00319-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving technology, with various applications in dentistry including diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. There are various AI-based applications for dental practitioners, however, their real-world evaluation through deployement studies is scarce, as most of the studies are validation studies. This review explores the potential pitfalls of focusing solely on technical performance metrics when evaluating AI-based applications in dentistry while overlooking the importance of clinical applicability.

Methods: An electronic search was performed on PubMed and Scopus while a manual search was conducted on Google Scholar "Dentistry", "Dental", "Artificial Intelligence", "Deep Learning, "Machine Learning", "Applications", "Diagnocat", "CephX", "Denti.AI", "VideaAI", "Smile Designer", "Overjet", "DentalXR.AI", "Smilo.AI", "Smile.AI", "Pearl", "AI deployment challenges in dental practice", "AI for treatment planning in dentistry", "AI in dental imaging", and "AI-based diagnosis in dentistry".

Results: The electronic search yielded a total of 34 studies, while 10 additional studies were obtained through a manual search, resulting in a total of 44 studies included in this review.  Among the 44 studies analyzed, 26 studies were retrospective, while 7 studies utilized a comparative design. The remaining studies comprised of 3 observational, 5 validation, 2 cross-sectional, and 1 prospective study. Further to evaluate the identified applications, relevant companies were contacted via email. Only one company's representative responded, offering a limited trial version which was insufficient for evaluating the application's effectiveness. AI technologies may offer lots of benefits for dental practice by enhancing patient-health-based outcomes, however, real-world applications are necessary to ensure its safety.

Conclusion: This work highlights the need for conducting deployment studies for such AI-based dental applications to translate and implement them into dental practice. Collaboration with stakeholders and dental practitioners to assess the use of such applications is of paramount importance.

关于在牙科中部署基于人工智能的应用程序的关注-综述。
人工智能(AI)是一项快速发展的技术,在牙科诊断、治疗计划和预后等方面有着广泛的应用。牙科从业者有各种基于人工智能的应用,然而,通过部署研究对其进行实际评估的研究很少,因为大多数研究都是验证性研究。这篇综述探讨了在评估基于人工智能的牙科应用时,仅仅关注技术性能指标而忽视临床适用性的重要性的潜在缺陷。方法:在PubMed和Scopus上进行电子检索,在谷歌Scholar上进行人工检索,检索词为“Dentistry”、“Dental”、“Artificial Intelligence”、“Deep Learning”、“Machine Learning”、“Applications”、“Diagnocat”、“CephX”、“Denti”。,“VideaAI”,“Smile Designer”,“Overjet”,“DentalXR”。人工智能”、“Smilo。人工智能”、“微笑。“AI”、“Pearl”、“AI在牙科实践中的部署挑战”、“AI在牙科治疗计划中的应用”、“AI在牙科成像中的应用”、“AI在牙科诊断中的应用”。结果:电子检索共纳入34项研究,人工检索共纳入10项研究,共纳入44项研究。在分析的44项研究中,26项研究为回顾性研究,7项研究采用比较设计。其余研究包括3项观察性研究、5项验证性研究、2项横断面研究和1项前瞻性研究。为了进一步评估已确定的申请,我们通过电子邮件联系了相关公司。只有一家公司的代表回应了,提供了一个有限的试用版本,不足以评估应用程序的有效性。人工智能技术可以通过提高患者健康结果为牙科实践提供许多好处,然而,现实世界的应用是必要的,以确保其安全性。结论:这项工作强调了对这种基于人工智能的牙科应用进行部署研究的必要性,以便将其转化并实施到牙科实践中。与利益相关者和牙科医生合作评估这些应用程序的使用是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信