Gender Equality Training for Students in Higher Education: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Claire Condron, Mide Power, Midhun Mathew, Siobhan Lucey, Patrick Henn, Tanya Dean, Michelle Kirrane-Scott, Walter Eppich, Siobhan M Lucey
{"title":"Gender Equality Training for Students in Higher Education: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Claire Condron, Mide Power, Midhun Mathew, Siobhan Lucey, Patrick Henn, Tanya Dean, Michelle Kirrane-Scott, Walter Eppich, Siobhan M Lucey","doi":"10.2196/60061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite recent improvements, gender inequality persists within the higher education sector, as evidenced by the proportionally greater number of student and academic leadership positions occupied by male students and staff. Gender equality education and training for students may help to develop awareness, knowledge, and skills among individual students, building capacity to address biases and accelerate culture change in higher education institutes (HEIs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our review seeks to identify and explore the existing literature on gender equality training interventions for third level students, with a particular emphasis on training content, methodology and outcome evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arskey & O'Malley's six-stage framework was employed to map the literature related to current best practice in gender equality training for students in higher education. Systematic database searches of peer-reviewed literature were carried out and 3140 titles, 33 abstracts, and 52 full-text articles were screened for eligibility with 14 articles selected for inclusion in this review. A theory of change lens was applied to provide a structured approach to examine their focus and relevance within the context of gender equality training in higher education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The selected studies detail a range of pedagogical approaches, including didactic lectures, participatory and co-design workshops, reflective writing, and service learning, with durations ranging from a single interaction to one year. Most articles reviewed do not explicitly state their study aims or research question, and the theoretical underpinnings are generally vaguely described. The longer-term impact of most interventions is unclear, as evaluation metrics seldom go beyond the level of adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review shows that the literature base for gender equality training for third level students lacks coherence, highlighting the need for further work to evaluate its impact. This work provides a foundation for developing training design recommendations.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong>JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e44584 doi: 10.2196/44584.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite recent improvements, gender inequality persists within the higher education sector, as evidenced by the proportionally greater number of student and academic leadership positions occupied by male students and staff. Gender equality education and training for students may help to develop awareness, knowledge, and skills among individual students, building capacity to address biases and accelerate culture change in higher education institutes (HEIs).

Objective: Our review seeks to identify and explore the existing literature on gender equality training interventions for third level students, with a particular emphasis on training content, methodology and outcome evaluation.

Methods: The Arskey & O'Malley's six-stage framework was employed to map the literature related to current best practice in gender equality training for students in higher education. Systematic database searches of peer-reviewed literature were carried out and 3140 titles, 33 abstracts, and 52 full-text articles were screened for eligibility with 14 articles selected for inclusion in this review. A theory of change lens was applied to provide a structured approach to examine their focus and relevance within the context of gender equality training in higher education.

Results: The selected studies detail a range of pedagogical approaches, including didactic lectures, participatory and co-design workshops, reflective writing, and service learning, with durations ranging from a single interaction to one year. Most articles reviewed do not explicitly state their study aims or research question, and the theoretical underpinnings are generally vaguely described. The longer-term impact of most interventions is unclear, as evaluation metrics seldom go beyond the level of adoption.

Conclusions: This scoping review shows that the literature base for gender equality training for third level students lacks coherence, highlighting the need for further work to evaluate its impact. This work provides a foundation for developing training design recommendations.

Clinicaltrial: JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e44584 doi: 10.2196/44584.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信