Finger thoracostomy: Significant risks and unproven benefits in prehospital settings.

Abstract

Background: Trauma is a leading cause of preventable death, with a significant portion of trauma deaths occurring in the prehospital setting. Interventions such as chest drainage may play a critical role in managing life-threatening conditions but face challenges due to poorly defined indications and reliance on anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous studies. Among chest drainage techniques, finger thoracostomy (FT) is a well-described, but controversial, method for decompressing the pleural cavity in emergencies like tension pneumothorax or hemothorax. Despite its simplicity and minimal equipment requirements, FT carries risks, including bleeding, infection, organ injury, temporary effects, and procedural failure.

Study design and methods: This study examines eight FT procedures performed by Israel Defense Forces providers during the 2023-2024 "Swords of Iron" War in Gaza.

Results: All patients sustained severe penetrating injuries, with mixed outcomes. One case highlighted severe complications, including infection and empyema weeks later. Additionally, challenges in maintaining up-to-date knowledge and adherence to protocols among reservists led to unauthorized FT procedures, emphasizing the dangers of improvisation without evidence.

Discussion: Our findings, coupled with limited evidence for FT's effectiveness in prehospital settings, raise questions about its appropriateness in trauma care. These concerns highlight the critical importance of adhering to validated and evidence-based protocols in all aspects of medical practice. Deviating from such protocols not only introduces unnecessary risks but also undermines the standardization essential for optimal patient care. Further research is needed to clarify the role, if any, of FT in prehospital trauma management.