Early identification of high-risk patients admitted to emergency departments using vital signs and machine learning.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Qingyuan Liu, Yixin Zhang, Jian Sun, Kaipeng Wang, Yueguo Wang, Yulan Wang, Cailing Ren, Yan Wang, Jiashan Zhu, Shusheng Zhou, Mengping Zhang, Yinglei Lai, Kui Jin
{"title":"Early identification of high-risk patients admitted to emergency departments using vital signs and machine learning.","authors":"Qingyuan Liu, Yixin Zhang, Jian Sun, Kaipeng Wang, Yueguo Wang, Yulan Wang, Cailing Ren, Yan Wang, Jiashan Zhu, Shusheng Zhou, Mengping Zhang, Yinglei Lai, Kui Jin","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid and accurate identification of high-risk patients in the emergency departments (EDs) is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop an early prediction model for identifying high-risk patients in EDs using initial vital sign measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed initial vital signs from the Chinese Emergency Triage, Assessment, and Treatment (CETAT) database, which was collected between January 1<sup>st</sup>, 2020, and June 25<sup>th</sup>, 2023. The primary outcome was the identification of high-risk patients needing immediate treatment. Various machine learning methods, including a deep-learning-based multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier were evaluated. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). AUC- ROC values were reported for three scenarios: a default case, a scenario requiring sensitivity greater than 0.8 (Scenario I), and a scenario requiring specificity greater than 0.8 (Scenario II). SHAP values were calculated to determine the importance of each predictor within the MLP model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38,797 patients were analyzed, of whom 18.2% were identified as high-risk. Comparative analysis of the predictive models for high-risk patients showed AUC-ROC values ranging from 0.717 to 0.738, with the MLP model outperforming logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). SHAP value analysis identified coma state, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and systolic blood pressure as the top three predictive factors in the MLP model, with coma state exerting the most contribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with other methods, the MLP model with initial vital signs demonstrated optimal prediction accuracy, highlighting its potential to enhance clinical decision-making in triage in the EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid and accurate identification of high-risk patients in the emergency departments (EDs) is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop an early prediction model for identifying high-risk patients in EDs using initial vital sign measurements.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed initial vital signs from the Chinese Emergency Triage, Assessment, and Treatment (CETAT) database, which was collected between January 1st, 2020, and June 25th, 2023. The primary outcome was the identification of high-risk patients needing immediate treatment. Various machine learning methods, including a deep-learning-based multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier were evaluated. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). AUC- ROC values were reported for three scenarios: a default case, a scenario requiring sensitivity greater than 0.8 (Scenario I), and a scenario requiring specificity greater than 0.8 (Scenario II). SHAP values were calculated to determine the importance of each predictor within the MLP model.

Results: A total of 38,797 patients were analyzed, of whom 18.2% were identified as high-risk. Comparative analysis of the predictive models for high-risk patients showed AUC-ROC values ranging from 0.717 to 0.738, with the MLP model outperforming logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). SHAP value analysis identified coma state, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), and systolic blood pressure as the top three predictive factors in the MLP model, with coma state exerting the most contribution.

Conclusion: Compared with other methods, the MLP model with initial vital signs demonstrated optimal prediction accuracy, highlighting its potential to enhance clinical decision-making in triage in the EDs.

利用生命体征和机器学习早期识别急诊科收治的高危患者。
背景:快速准确地识别急诊科(EDs)的高危患者对于优化资源配置和改善患者预后至关重要。本研究旨在建立一个早期预测模型,通过初始生命体征测量来识别急诊科的高危患者。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2020年1月1日至2023年6月25日期间收集的中国急诊分类、评估和治疗(CETAT)数据库中的初始生命体征。主要结果是确定需要立即治疗的高危患者。评估了各种机器学习方法,包括基于深度学习的多层感知器(MLP)分类器。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)评估模型性能。报告了三种情况的AUC- ROC值:默认情况,要求灵敏度大于0.8的情况(场景I)和要求特异性大于0.8的情况(场景II)。计算SHAP值以确定MLP模型中每个预测因子的重要性。结果:共分析38797例患者,其中18.2%为高危患者。高危患者预测模型对比分析显示,AUC-ROC值在0.717 ~ 0.738之间,MLP模型优于logistic回归(LR)、高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)和国家预警评分(NEWS)。SHAP值分析发现昏迷状态、外周毛细血管血氧饱和度(SpO2)和收缩压是MLP模型的前三大预测因素,其中昏迷状态贡献最大。结论:与其他方法相比,具有初始生命体征的MLP模型具有最佳的预测精度,突出了其在急诊科分诊中的临床决策潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信