Mental health of informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Swiss cohort study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cédric Follonier, Nick Pullen, Hélène Baysson, María-Eugenia Zaballa, Francesco Pennacchio, Stephanie Schrempft, Sara Levati, Mayssam Nehme, Idris Guessous, Silvia Stringhini, Elsa Lorthe
{"title":"Mental health of informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Swiss cohort study.","authors":"Cédric Follonier, Nick Pullen, Hélène Baysson, María-Eugenia Zaballa, Francesco Pennacchio, Stephanie Schrempft, Sara Levati, Mayssam Nehme, Idris Guessous, Silvia Stringhini, Elsa Lorthe","doi":"10.57187/s.3884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health measures have disrupted healthcare systems and may have impacted informal caregivers' mental health due to increased responsibilities and limited access to support services. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of mental distress among caregivers and non-caregivers and identify risk and protective factors for mental distress in caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from participants in Specchio-COVID19, a population-based cohort in Geneva, Switzerland. Mental distress was measured using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in June 2021. The prevalence of distress was compared between caregivers and non-caregivers. Risk and protective factors for mental distress among caregivers were explored using logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5416 participants, 1086 (20%) reported helping someone in a non-professional manner with activities of daily life and were considered caregivers. Mental distress was more frequent in caregivers than in non-caregivers (41% vs 37%, p = 0.010). In caregivers, limited social support (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25 [95% confidence interval: 1.10, 1.42]), caring for an individual with a mental condition (aOR = 1.21 [1.05, 1.41]), living over 10 km away from the care recipient (aOR = 1.17 [1.02, 1.34]), feeling more isolated in one's caregiving role (aOR = 1.20 [1.08, 1.32]), worrying about caregiving ability in case of COVID-19 or quarantine (aOR = 1.18 [1.08, 1.28]) and experiencing reduced availability of healthcare professionals (aOR = 1.11 [1.02, 1.22]) were associated with increased odds of mental distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informal caregivers experienced higher levels of mental distress than non-caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study highlights the need for public health policies that enhance both formal and informal support networks and include rapidly implementable solutions for caregiving continuity, benefiting both caregivers and their care recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"155 ","pages":"3884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims of the study: The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health measures have disrupted healthcare systems and may have impacted informal caregivers' mental health due to increased responsibilities and limited access to support services. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of mental distress among caregivers and non-caregivers and identify risk and protective factors for mental distress in caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Data were collected from participants in Specchio-COVID19, a population-based cohort in Geneva, Switzerland. Mental distress was measured using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in June 2021. The prevalence of distress was compared between caregivers and non-caregivers. Risk and protective factors for mental distress among caregivers were explored using logistic regressions.

Results: Among the 5416 participants, 1086 (20%) reported helping someone in a non-professional manner with activities of daily life and were considered caregivers. Mental distress was more frequent in caregivers than in non-caregivers (41% vs 37%, p = 0.010). In caregivers, limited social support (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25 [95% confidence interval: 1.10, 1.42]), caring for an individual with a mental condition (aOR = 1.21 [1.05, 1.41]), living over 10 km away from the care recipient (aOR = 1.17 [1.02, 1.34]), feeling more isolated in one's caregiving role (aOR = 1.20 [1.08, 1.32]), worrying about caregiving ability in case of COVID-19 or quarantine (aOR = 1.18 [1.08, 1.28]) and experiencing reduced availability of healthcare professionals (aOR = 1.11 [1.02, 1.22]) were associated with increased odds of mental distress.

Conclusion: Informal caregivers experienced higher levels of mental distress than non-caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study highlights the need for public health policies that enhance both formal and informal support networks and include rapidly implementable solutions for caregiving continuity, benefiting both caregivers and their care recipients.

COVID-19大流行期间非正规护理人员的心理健康:一项瑞士队列研究
研究目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行和相关的公共卫生措施扰乱了医疗保健系统,由于责任增加和获得支持服务的机会有限,可能影响了非正式护理人员的心理健康。本研究旨在研究COVID-19大流行期间护理人员和非护理人员精神困扰的患病率,并确定护理人员精神困扰的风险和保护因素。方法:从瑞士日内瓦以人群为基础的队列- specchio - covid - 19的参与者中收集数据。2021年6月,使用12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)测量精神痛苦。比较照顾者和非照顾者的痛苦发生率。运用logistic回归分析探讨护理人员精神困扰的危险因素和保护因素。结果:在5416名参与者中,1086名(20%)报告以非专业的方式帮助他人进行日常生活活动,并被认为是照顾者。照顾者比非照顾者更频繁出现精神困扰(41% vs 37%, p = 0.010)。在照顾者中,有限的社会支持(调整优势比[aOR] = 1.25)[95%置信区间:1.10, 1.42])、照顾有精神问题的个体(aOR = 1.21[1.05, 1.41])、居住在离照顾者超过10公里的地方(aOR = 1.17[1.02, 1.34])、在照顾角色中感到更孤立(aOR = 1.20[1.08, 1.32])、担心在COVID-19或隔离情况下的照顾能力(aOR = 1.18[1.08, 1.28])以及医疗保健专业人员的可用性减少(aOR = 1.11[1.02, 1.22])与精神困扰的几率增加相关。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,非正式护理人员比非护理人员经历了更高水平的精神痛苦。这项研究强调需要制定公共卫生政策,加强正式和非正式的支持网络,并包括快速实施的护理连续性解决方案,使护理者及其受护理者都受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信