Recurrent Stroke Prediction by Applying a Stroke Polygenic Risk Score in the Japanese Population.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047786
Naoki Kojima, Masaru Koido, Yunye He, Yuka Shimmori, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Stéphanie Debette, Yoichiro Kamatani
{"title":"Recurrent Stroke Prediction by Applying a Stroke Polygenic Risk Score in the Japanese Population.","authors":"Naoki Kojima, Masaru Koido, Yunye He, Yuka Shimmori, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Stéphanie Debette, Yoichiro Kamatani","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, various polygenic risk score (PRS)-based methods were developed to improve stroke prediction. However, current PRSs (including cross-ancestry PRS) poorly predict recurrent stroke. Here, we aimed to determine whether the best PRS for Japanese individuals can also predict stroke recurrence in this population by extensively comparing the methods and maximizing the predictive performance for stroke onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the disease-oriented BBJ1 (BioBank Japan first cohort; recruited between 2003 and 2007, n=179 938) to derive and optimize the PRSs using a 10-fold cross-validation. We integrated the optimized PRSs for multiple traits, such as vascular risk factors and stroke subtypes to generate a single PRS using the meta-scoring approach (metaGRS). We used an independent BBJ2 (BBJ second cohort; recruited between 2012 and 2017, n=41 929) as a test sample to evaluate the association of the metaGRS with stroke and recurrent stroke. In addition, we analyzed its association stratified by risk factors. We administered 3 distinct tests to consider the potential index event bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed recurrent stroke cases (n=174) and nonrecurrent stroke controls (n=1153) among subjects within the BBJ2. After adjusting for known risk factors, metaGRS was associated with stroke recurrence (adjusted odds ratio per SD, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.00-1.39]; <i>P</i>=0.044), although no significant correlation was observed with the published PRSs. The outcomes derived from these examinations did not provide any significant indication of the influence of index event bias. The high metaGRS group without a history of hypertension had a higher risk of stroke recurrence than that of the low metaGRS group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.07-4.66]; <i>P</i>=0.032). There was no association at all in the hypertension group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.69-2.13]; <i>P</i>=0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The metaGRS developed in a Japanese cohort predicted stroke recurrence in an independent cohort of patients. In particular, it predicted an increased risk of recurrence among stroke patients without hypertension. These findings provide clues for additional genetic risk stratification and help in developing personalized strategies for stroke recurrence prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"1483-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, various polygenic risk score (PRS)-based methods were developed to improve stroke prediction. However, current PRSs (including cross-ancestry PRS) poorly predict recurrent stroke. Here, we aimed to determine whether the best PRS for Japanese individuals can also predict stroke recurrence in this population by extensively comparing the methods and maximizing the predictive performance for stroke onset.

Methods: We used data from the disease-oriented BBJ1 (BioBank Japan first cohort; recruited between 2003 and 2007, n=179 938) to derive and optimize the PRSs using a 10-fold cross-validation. We integrated the optimized PRSs for multiple traits, such as vascular risk factors and stroke subtypes to generate a single PRS using the meta-scoring approach (metaGRS). We used an independent BBJ2 (BBJ second cohort; recruited between 2012 and 2017, n=41 929) as a test sample to evaluate the association of the metaGRS with stroke and recurrent stroke. In addition, we analyzed its association stratified by risk factors. We administered 3 distinct tests to consider the potential index event bias.

Results: We analyzed recurrent stroke cases (n=174) and nonrecurrent stroke controls (n=1153) among subjects within the BBJ2. After adjusting for known risk factors, metaGRS was associated with stroke recurrence (adjusted odds ratio per SD, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.00-1.39]; P=0.044), although no significant correlation was observed with the published PRSs. The outcomes derived from these examinations did not provide any significant indication of the influence of index event bias. The high metaGRS group without a history of hypertension had a higher risk of stroke recurrence than that of the low metaGRS group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.07-4.66]; P=0.032). There was no association at all in the hypertension group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.69-2.13]; P=0.50).

Conclusions: The metaGRS developed in a Japanese cohort predicted stroke recurrence in an independent cohort of patients. In particular, it predicted an increased risk of recurrence among stroke patients without hypertension. These findings provide clues for additional genetic risk stratification and help in developing personalized strategies for stroke recurrence prevention.

应用卒中多基因风险评分预测日本人群卒中复发
背景:近年来,各种基于多基因风险评分(PRS)的方法被开发出来,以改善脑卒中的预测。然而,目前的PRS(包括跨祖先PRS)很难预测卒中复发。在这里,我们的目的是通过广泛比较方法和最大化脑卒中发作的预测性能,确定日本个体的最佳PRS是否也可以预测该人群的脑卒中复发。方法:我们使用的数据来自疾病导向的BBJ1 (BioBank Japan)第一队列;招募于2003年至2007年间,n=179 938),使用10倍交叉验证来推导和优化PRSs。我们使用meta评分方法(metaGRS)整合了针对多种特征(如血管危险因素和卒中亚型)优化的PRS,生成了一个单一的PRS。我们使用了独立的BBJ2 (BBJ第二队列;招募于2012年至2017年,n= 41429)作为测试样本,以评估metaGRS与卒中和复发性卒中的相关性。此外,我们还按危险因素分层分析了其相关性。我们进行了3个不同的试验来考虑潜在的指数事件偏倚。结果:我们分析了BBJ2研究对象中复发性卒中病例(n=174)和非复发性卒中对照(n=1153)。在对已知危险因素进行校正后,metaGRS与卒中复发相关(每SD校正优势比为1.18 [95% CI, 1.00-1.39];P=0.044),但未观察到与已发表的prs有显著相关性。从这些检查中得出的结果没有提供指数事件偏倚影响的任何显著指示。无高血压史的高metaGRS组卒中复发风险高于低metaGRS组(校正优势比2.24 [95% CI, 1.07-4.66];P = 0.032)。高血压组没有任何关联(校正优势比为1.21 [95% CI, 0.69-2.13];P = 0.50)。结论:在一个日本队列中开发的metaGRS预测了一个独立队列患者的卒中复发。特别是,它预测无高血压的中风患者复发的风险增加。这些发现为进一步的遗传风险分层提供了线索,并有助于制定预防中风复发的个性化策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信