Disproportionately higher asthma risk and incidence with high fructose corn syrup, but not sucrose intake, among Black young adults: the CARDIA Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Luanne Robalo DeChristopher, Katherine L Tucker
{"title":"Disproportionately higher asthma risk and incidence with high fructose corn syrup, but not sucrose intake, among Black young adults: the CARDIA Study.","authors":"Luanne Robalo DeChristopher, Katherine L Tucker","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There have been <i>unsafe levels of unpaired fructose</i> in the high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in US beverages, and research/case study evidence shows that their intake is associated with greater asthma prevalence/risk/incidence, a debilitating disease, likely due to fructose malabsorption, gut fructosylation and gut dysbiosis mechanisms. The 'unexplained' asthma epidemic has disproportionately affected children and Black individuals, groups with higher fructose malabsorption prevalence than others, and research to assess disproportionately higher asthma risk/incidence among Black individuals in association with HFCS-sweetened beverage intake is lacking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Demographic, lifestyle and dietary data collected at enrollment (1985-86), and incident asthma through exam 5 (1995-96), were used in Cox proportional hazards models to assess HFCS intake associations (hazard ratios) with asthma risk/incidence.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>CARDIA study participants from Birmingham, AL, Chicago, IL, Minneapolis, MN and Oakland, CA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1998 Black and 2104 White young adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HFCS-sweetened beverage intake > once/week <i>was</i> significantly associated with higher asthma risk relative to ≤ once/week (<i>P</i>-trend = 0·04), among Black participants only; risk was 2·8 times higher among 2-4 times/week consumers (HR = 2·8, 95 % CI 1·1, 7·3, <i>P</i> = 0·04) and 3·5 times higher when consumed multiple times/d, independent of <i>sucrose</i> intake/obesity/dietary quality/smoking/in-home smoke-exposure (HR = 3·5, 95 % CI 1·3, 9·9, <i>P</i> = 0·02). Intake of <i>orange juice</i>, with nominal unpaired fructose, was <i>not</i> associated with asthma in either group, <i>nor was intake of sucrose</i>, a disaccharide (paired) of fructose/glucose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ubiquitous HFCS in the US food supply, with HFCS that contains high/unsafe unpaired fructose, also known as excess-free-fructose, and the fructose/gut/lung/axis are overlooked risk factors in the 'unexplained' US asthma epidemic that disproportionately affects Black individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There have been unsafe levels of unpaired fructose in the high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in US beverages, and research/case study evidence shows that their intake is associated with greater asthma prevalence/risk/incidence, a debilitating disease, likely due to fructose malabsorption, gut fructosylation and gut dysbiosis mechanisms. The 'unexplained' asthma epidemic has disproportionately affected children and Black individuals, groups with higher fructose malabsorption prevalence than others, and research to assess disproportionately higher asthma risk/incidence among Black individuals in association with HFCS-sweetened beverage intake is lacking.

Design: Demographic, lifestyle and dietary data collected at enrollment (1985-86), and incident asthma through exam 5 (1995-96), were used in Cox proportional hazards models to assess HFCS intake associations (hazard ratios) with asthma risk/incidence.

Setting: CARDIA study participants from Birmingham, AL, Chicago, IL, Minneapolis, MN and Oakland, CA.

Participants: 1998 Black and 2104 White young adults.

Results: HFCS-sweetened beverage intake > once/week was significantly associated with higher asthma risk relative to ≤ once/week (P-trend = 0·04), among Black participants only; risk was 2·8 times higher among 2-4 times/week consumers (HR = 2·8, 95 % CI 1·1, 7·3, P = 0·04) and 3·5 times higher when consumed multiple times/d, independent of sucrose intake/obesity/dietary quality/smoking/in-home smoke-exposure (HR = 3·5, 95 % CI 1·3, 9·9, P = 0·02). Intake of orange juice, with nominal unpaired fructose, was not associated with asthma in either group, nor was intake of sucrose, a disaccharide (paired) of fructose/glucose.

Conclusions: Ubiquitous HFCS in the US food supply, with HFCS that contains high/unsafe unpaired fructose, also known as excess-free-fructose, and the fructose/gut/lung/axis are overlooked risk factors in the 'unexplained' US asthma epidemic that disproportionately affects Black individuals.

在黑人青年中,高果糖玉米糖浆而不是蔗糖的摄入,哮喘风险和发病率不成比例地高——CARDIA研究。
目的:美国饮料中的高果糖玉米糖浆(HFCS)中未配对果糖的含量已达到不安全水平,研究/案例研究证据表明,HFCS的摄入与更高的哮喘患病率/风险/发病率相关,这是一种使人衰弱的疾病,可能是由于果糖吸收不良、肠道果糖基化和肠道生态失调机制所致。“无法解释的”哮喘流行对儿童和黑人个体的影响不成比例,这些群体的果糖吸收不良患病率高于其他人,并且缺乏评估黑人个体中不成比例的高哮喘风险/发病率与HFCS加糖饮料摄入相关的研究。设计:采用Cox比例风险模型,评估HFCS摄入与哮喘风险/发病率之间的关联(风险比),采用入组时收集的人口统计学、生活方式、饮食数据(1985-86),以及通过检查5(1995-96)收集的哮喘发病率。环境:心脏研究的参与者来自伯明翰,AL,芝加哥,IL,明尼阿波利斯,MN和奥克兰,ca。参与者:1998名黑人和2104名白人年轻人。结果:仅在黑人参与者中,HFCS加糖饮料摄入量>次/周与≤1次/周的哮喘风险显著相关(p趋势=0.04);每周消费2-4次的人群风险高2.8倍(HR=2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.3, P=0.04),每天消费多次的人群风险高3.5倍,与蔗糖摄入量/肥胖/饮食质量/吸烟/家庭吸烟无关(HR=3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.9, P=0.02)。在两组中,摄入含有未配对果糖的橙汁与哮喘无关,摄入果糖/葡萄糖的双糖(成对)蔗糖也与哮喘无关。结论:HFCS在美国食品供应中无处不在,HFCS含有高/不安全的未配对果糖,即过量的游离果糖,果糖/肠道/肺/轴是“无法解释的”美国哮喘流行中被忽视的危险因素,对黑人的影响不成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信