Enhanced Pain Relief with Catheter-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Case Series of Patients with Unilateral Lumbar Radicular Pain.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.132329
Jamal Hasoon, Jatinder Gill, Cyrus Yazdi, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
{"title":"Enhanced Pain Relief with Catheter-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Case Series of Patients with Unilateral Lumbar Radicular Pain.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Jatinder Gill, Cyrus Yazdi, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.52965/001c.132329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a common intervention for lumbar radicular pain, but responses can be variable. When initial injections provide suboptimal relief, targeted approaches using an epidural catheter may enhance efficacy.</p><p><strong>Case series: </strong>We describe three patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain who underwent caudal ESIs using a 22-gauge spinal needle. Each patient experienced suboptimal pain relief following the initial injection. Patient 1 reported only 30% improvement at the 2-week follow-up. Patient 2 initially experienced 80% pain relief, but this improvement lasted only 3 days, returning to baseline by the 2-week follow-up. Patient 3 reported 40% improvement at the 2-week follow-up. Given their limited response, all three patients underwent a repeat caudal ESI using an epidural catheter advanced toward the symptomatic side and area of interest. After the catheter-guided injection, Patient 1 experienced 70% pain relief, Patient 2 achieved 60% relief, and Patient 3 reported 100% relief, all assessed at the 2-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case series highlights the potential benefit of catheter-guided caudal ESIs in patients with suboptimal responses to single-shot caudal injections. The improved outcomes suggest that targeted epidural drug delivery may enhance pain relief in select cases of unilateral lumbar radicular pain. Further research is needed to evaluate this approach's long-term efficacy and optimal patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"132329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.132329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a common intervention for lumbar radicular pain, but responses can be variable. When initial injections provide suboptimal relief, targeted approaches using an epidural catheter may enhance efficacy.

Case series: We describe three patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain who underwent caudal ESIs using a 22-gauge spinal needle. Each patient experienced suboptimal pain relief following the initial injection. Patient 1 reported only 30% improvement at the 2-week follow-up. Patient 2 initially experienced 80% pain relief, but this improvement lasted only 3 days, returning to baseline by the 2-week follow-up. Patient 3 reported 40% improvement at the 2-week follow-up. Given their limited response, all three patients underwent a repeat caudal ESI using an epidural catheter advanced toward the symptomatic side and area of interest. After the catheter-guided injection, Patient 1 experienced 70% pain relief, Patient 2 achieved 60% relief, and Patient 3 reported 100% relief, all assessed at the 2-week follow-up.

Conclusion: This case series highlights the potential benefit of catheter-guided caudal ESIs in patients with suboptimal responses to single-shot caudal injections. The improved outcomes suggest that targeted epidural drug delivery may enhance pain relief in select cases of unilateral lumbar radicular pain. Further research is needed to evaluate this approach's long-term efficacy and optimal patient selection.

经导管引导的尾侧硬膜外类固醇注射增强疼痛缓解:单侧腰神经根痛患者病例系列。
背景:尾侧硬膜外类固醇注射(ESIs)是腰椎神经根性疼痛的常见干预措施,但反应可能不同。当最初的注射不能提供最佳的缓解时,使用硬膜外导管的定向入路可能会提高疗效。病例系列:我们描述了3例单侧腰根性疼痛的患者,他们使用22号脊髓针进行了尾侧穿刺。每位患者在初始注射后都经历了次优的疼痛缓解。患者1在2周的随访中仅报告了30%的改善。患者2最初经历了80%的疼痛缓解,但这种改善只持续了3天,在2周的随访中恢复到基线。患者3在2周的随访中报告了40%的改善。鉴于他们的反应有限,所有三名患者使用硬膜外导管向症状侧和感兴趣区域进行了重复的尾侧ESI。导管引导注射后,患者1疼痛缓解70%,患者2疼痛缓解60%,患者3疼痛缓解100%,均在2周随访中评估。结论:本病例系列强调了导管引导的尾侧注射对单次尾侧注射反应不佳的患者的潜在益处。改善的结果表明,有针对性的硬膜外药物输送可能会增强单侧腰根性疼痛的缓解。需要进一步的研究来评估这种方法的长期疗效和最佳的患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信