Improving differentiation of hemorrhagic brain metastases from non-neoplastic hematomas using radiomics and clinical feature fusion.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Linyang Cui, Luyue Yu, Sai Shao, Liping Zuo, Hongjun Hou, Jie Liu, Wenjun Zhang, Ju Liu, Qiang Wu, Dexin Yu
{"title":"Improving differentiation of hemorrhagic brain metastases from non-neoplastic hematomas using radiomics and clinical feature fusion.","authors":"Linyang Cui, Luyue Yu, Sai Shao, Liping Zuo, Hongjun Hou, Jie Liu, Wenjun Zhang, Ju Liu, Qiang Wu, Dexin Yu","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03590-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a fusion model combining multi-sequence MRI radiomics and clinico-radiological features to distinguish hemorrhagic brain metastasis covered by hematoma (HBM.cbh) from non-neoplastic intracranial hematomas (nn-ICH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 146 patients with pathologically or clinically proven HBM.cbh (n = 55) and nn-ICH (n = 91) were collected from two clinical institutions. Radiomics features were extracted from various regions (hemorrhage and/or edema) based on T2-weighted, T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and T1 contrast-enhanced imaging. Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was performed to balance the minority group (HBM.cbh). Logistic regression (LR) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) were utilized to construct the models based on clinico-radiological factors (clinical model), radiomic features from various modalities of MRI (radiomics model), and their combination (fusion model). The area under the curve (AUC) values of different models on the external dataset were compared using DeLong's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-sequence radiomics model based on the entire region performed the best in all radiomics models, with or without SMOTE, where the AUCs were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The AUC of clinical mode was 0.71 with SMOTE, and 0.62 without SMOTE. The fusion model demonstrated excellent predictive value with or without SMOTE (AUC: 0.93 and 0.90, respectively), outperforming both the radiomics and clinical model (0.93 vs. 0.83, 0.71, p < 0.05 and 0.90 vs. 0.84, 0.62, p < 0.05, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multi-sequence radiomics model is an effective method for differentiating HBM.cbh from nn-ICH. It can yield the best diagnostic performance prediction model when combined with clinico-radiological features.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03590-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a fusion model combining multi-sequence MRI radiomics and clinico-radiological features to distinguish hemorrhagic brain metastasis covered by hematoma (HBM.cbh) from non-neoplastic intracranial hematomas (nn-ICH).

Methods: The data of 146 patients with pathologically or clinically proven HBM.cbh (n = 55) and nn-ICH (n = 91) were collected from two clinical institutions. Radiomics features were extracted from various regions (hemorrhage and/or edema) based on T2-weighted, T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and T1 contrast-enhanced imaging. Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was performed to balance the minority group (HBM.cbh). Logistic regression (LR) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) were utilized to construct the models based on clinico-radiological factors (clinical model), radiomic features from various modalities of MRI (radiomics model), and their combination (fusion model). The area under the curve (AUC) values of different models on the external dataset were compared using DeLong's test.

Results: The 4-sequence radiomics model based on the entire region performed the best in all radiomics models, with or without SMOTE, where the AUCs were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The AUC of clinical mode was 0.71 with SMOTE, and 0.62 without SMOTE. The fusion model demonstrated excellent predictive value with or without SMOTE (AUC: 0.93 and 0.90, respectively), outperforming both the radiomics and clinical model (0.93 vs. 0.83, 0.71, p < 0.05 and 0.90 vs. 0.84, 0.62, p < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusions: The multi-sequence radiomics model is an effective method for differentiating HBM.cbh from nn-ICH. It can yield the best diagnostic performance prediction model when combined with clinico-radiological features.

应用放射组学和临床特征融合提高出血性脑转移与非肿瘤性血肿的鉴别。
目的:本研究旨在建立并验证一种结合多序列MRI放射组学和临床放射学特征的融合模型,以区分血肿覆盖的出血性脑转移(HBM.cbh)和非肿瘤性颅内血肿(nn-ICH)。方法:收集146例经病理或临床证实的HBM患者的资料。cbh (n = 55)和nn-ICH (n = 91)分别来自两家临床机构。基于t2加权、T1加权、液体衰减反转恢复和T1增强成像,从不同区域(出血和/或水肿)提取放射组学特征。采用合成少数过采样技术(SMOTE)来平衡少数群体(HBM.cbh)。利用Logistic回归(LR)和k近邻(KNN)构建基于临床-放射学因素(临床模型)、各种MRI模式的放射学特征(放射组学模型)及其组合(融合模型)的模型。采用DeLong’s test比较不同模型在外部数据集上的曲线下面积(AUC)值。结果:无论有无SMOTE,基于全区域的4序列放射组学模型在所有放射组学模型中表现最好,auc分别为0.83和0.84。有SMOTE的临床模式AUC为0.71,无SMOTE的AUC为0.62。无论有无SMOTE,融合模型都显示出出色的预测价值(AUC分别为0.93和0.90),优于放射组学和临床模型(0.93 vs. 0.83, 0.71, p)。源自nn-ICH。结合临床影像学特征,可获得最佳的诊断预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信