Disability level as a key predictor of mortality in patients with oral cancer: A hospital-based retrospective study in Taiwan.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chih-Chin Lai, Jing-Rong Jhuang, Kuo-Liong Chien, Chun-Nan Chen, Jiu-Jenq Lin, Hsin-Hui Peng, Shin-Liang Pan
{"title":"Disability level as a key predictor of mortality in patients with oral cancer: A hospital-based retrospective study in Taiwan.","authors":"Chih-Chin Lai, Jing-Rong Jhuang, Kuo-Liong Chien, Chun-Nan Chen, Jiu-Jenq Lin, Hsin-Hui Peng, Shin-Liang Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the demographics, comorbidities, and mortality rates of patients diagnosed with oral cancer, guided by a hypothesis that disability level would emerge as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes alongside age and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Socio-demographic and medical information for patients treated for oral cancer at National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) from 2012 to 2018 was collected, along with their mortality data from NTUH's integrated medical database. Disability levels were measured using WHODAS 2.0, dividing patients into severe (WHODAS score ≥60, n = 197) and non-severe disability (WHODAS score ≤59, n = 228) groups. The primary outcome was overall survival probability. Propensity-score matching balanced baseline characteristics, and Cox proportional-hazard models analyzed the impact of various covariates on mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 425 patients diagnosed with oral cancer were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 55.1 years (standard deviation, 9.8). The majority (95 %) were men. Over the 6.75-year data-collection window, 94 of them (22.1 %) died. The severely disabled group exhibited significantly poorer survival (p = 0.02), and univariate analyses identified WHODAS scores of 60 or higher as an independent prognostic factor among patients with oral cancer (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95 % confidence interval = [1.05-2.40]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WHODAS 2.0 scores of 60 or higher indicate severe to extreme disability, which often correlates with poorer overall health and reduced ability to manage oral cancer and its treatments. This significant impairment is likely to be a contributory factor in higher mortality rates amongst this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the demographics, comorbidities, and mortality rates of patients diagnosed with oral cancer, guided by a hypothesis that disability level would emerge as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes alongside age and comorbidities.

Methods: Socio-demographic and medical information for patients treated for oral cancer at National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) from 2012 to 2018 was collected, along with their mortality data from NTUH's integrated medical database. Disability levels were measured using WHODAS 2.0, dividing patients into severe (WHODAS score ≥60, n = 197) and non-severe disability (WHODAS score ≤59, n = 228) groups. The primary outcome was overall survival probability. Propensity-score matching balanced baseline characteristics, and Cox proportional-hazard models analyzed the impact of various covariates on mortality rates.

Results: A total of 425 patients diagnosed with oral cancer were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 55.1 years (standard deviation, 9.8). The majority (95 %) were men. Over the 6.75-year data-collection window, 94 of them (22.1 %) died. The severely disabled group exhibited significantly poorer survival (p = 0.02), and univariate analyses identified WHODAS scores of 60 or higher as an independent prognostic factor among patients with oral cancer (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95 % confidence interval = [1.05-2.40]).

Conclusion: WHODAS 2.0 scores of 60 or higher indicate severe to extreme disability, which often correlates with poorer overall health and reduced ability to manage oral cancer and its treatments. This significant impairment is likely to be a contributory factor in higher mortality rates amongst this patient group.

残障程度是口腔癌患者死亡率的关键预测因子:台湾一项以医院为基础的回顾性研究。
背景:本研究调查口腔癌患者的人口统计学、合并症和死亡率,假设残疾水平将与年龄和合并症一起成为不良结局的独立预测因子。方法:收集2012 - 2018年在台湾大学附属医院(NTUH)接受口腔癌治疗的患者的社会人口统计学和医学信息,以及NTUH综合医学数据库中的死亡率数据。采用WHODAS 2.0测量残疾水平,将患者分为重度(WHODAS评分≥60分,n = 197)和非重度(WHODAS评分≤59分,n = 228)组。主要终点为总生存概率。倾向评分匹配平衡基线特征,Cox比例风险模型分析了各种协变量对死亡率的影响。结果:共有425名诊断为口腔癌的患者入组,平均年龄为55.1岁(标准差为9.8)。大多数(95%)是男性。在6.75年的数据收集期内,其中94人(22.1%)死亡。重度残疾组的生存率明显较差(p = 0.02),单因素分析发现WHODAS评分60分或更高是口腔癌患者的独立预后因素(风险比= 1.59,95%可信区间=[1.05-2.40])。结论:WHODAS 2.0评分为60分或更高表明严重至极度残疾,这通常与整体健康状况较差以及口腔癌及其治疗管理能力降低有关。这种严重的损伤很可能是导致这一患者群体死亡率较高的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信