Georg Schlachtenberger, Simon Schallenberg, Fabian Doerr, Hruy Menghesha, Christopher Gaisendrees, Andres Amorin, Alberto Lopez-Pastorini, Reinhard Büettner, Alexander Quaas, David Horst, Frederick Klauschen, Nikolaj Frost, Jens C Rueckert, Jens Neudecker, Khosro Hekmat, Matthias B Heldwein
{"title":"Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Skip-N2 Metastases Have Similar Survival to N1 Patients-A Multicenter Analysis.","authors":"Georg Schlachtenberger, Simon Schallenberg, Fabian Doerr, Hruy Menghesha, Christopher Gaisendrees, Andres Amorin, Alberto Lopez-Pastorini, Reinhard Büettner, Alexander Quaas, David Horst, Frederick Klauschen, Nikolaj Frost, Jens C Rueckert, Jens Neudecker, Khosro Hekmat, Matthias B Heldwein","doi":"10.3390/jpm15030113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Nodal involvement is one of the most important prognostic factors in NSCLC. Skip-N2 metastasis (N0N2), which is N2 metastasis in the absence of N1 metastasis, occurs in approximately 20-30% of patients. According to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, N1 and N0N2 patients may have comparable long-term survival, considering their similar tumor stages. However, this conclusion remains controversial. Therefore, we carried out this multicenter study to examine the long-term survival and disease-free interval (DFI) of N0N2- and N1 patients. <b>Methods:</b> One-, three-, and five-year survival rates were measured. Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model assessed survival and were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival. <b>Results:</b> Between January 2010 and December 2020, 273 N0N2 and N1 patients were included in our analysis. Of those patients, 77 showed N0N2 and 196 N1. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Between N0N2 and N1 patients, there were no significant differences in one- (<i>p</i> = 0.67), three- (<i>p</i> = 0.20), and five-year (<i>p</i> = 0.27) survival. Furthermore, DFI did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.45). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings indicate that N0N2 patients have a prognosis comparable to that of patients with N1 disease. These results indicate that patients with N0N2 have a similar prognosis to N1 patients. N2-NSCLC is heterogeneous and would benefit from a more precise subdivision and differential treatment in the upcoming UICC 9 classification. The following question remains: are we overtreating N0N2 patients or undertreating N1 patients?</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nodal involvement is one of the most important prognostic factors in NSCLC. Skip-N2 metastasis (N0N2), which is N2 metastasis in the absence of N1 metastasis, occurs in approximately 20-30% of patients. According to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, N1 and N0N2 patients may have comparable long-term survival, considering their similar tumor stages. However, this conclusion remains controversial. Therefore, we carried out this multicenter study to examine the long-term survival and disease-free interval (DFI) of N0N2- and N1 patients. Methods: One-, three-, and five-year survival rates were measured. Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model assessed survival and were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival. Results: Between January 2010 and December 2020, 273 N0N2 and N1 patients were included in our analysis. Of those patients, 77 showed N0N2 and 196 N1. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Between N0N2 and N1 patients, there were no significant differences in one- (p = 0.67), three- (p = 0.20), and five-year (p = 0.27) survival. Furthermore, DFI did not differ between groups (p = 0.45). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that N0N2 patients have a prognosis comparable to that of patients with N1 disease. These results indicate that patients with N0N2 have a similar prognosis to N1 patients. N2-NSCLC is heterogeneous and would benefit from a more precise subdivision and differential treatment in the upcoming UICC 9 classification. The following question remains: are we overtreating N0N2 patients or undertreating N1 patients?
淋巴结受累是非小细胞肺癌最重要的预后因素之一。跳跃性N2转移(N0N2),即没有N1转移的N2转移,发生在约20-30%的患者中。根据国际肺癌研究协会(International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer)的数据,考虑到N1和N0N2患者的肿瘤分期相似,他们的长期生存率可能相当。然而,这一结论仍然存在争议。因此,我们开展了这项多中心研究,以检查N0N2-和N1患者的长期生存和无病间期(DFI)。方法:测定1年、3年和5年生存率。Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型评估生存率,并用于确定影响总生存率的预后因素。结果:2010年1月至2020年12月,273例N0N2和N1患者纳入我们的分析。其中N0N2 77例,N1 196例。各组间基线特征无显著差异。在N0N2和N1患者之间,1年(p = 0.67)、3年(p = 0.20)和5年(p = 0.27)生存率无显著差异。DFI组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.45)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,N0N2患者的预后与N1患者相当。这些结果表明,N0N2患者与N1患者预后相似。N2-NSCLC是异质性的,在即将到来的UICC 9分类中,将受益于更精确的细分和差异处理。以下问题仍然存在:我们对N0N2患者是过度治疗还是对N1患者治疗不足?
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.