Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery with Neuromuscular Monitoring and Sugammadex on Healthcare Costs and Effectiveness of Recovery in Patients Following Anterior Cervical Spine Discectomy.
{"title":"Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery with Neuromuscular Monitoring and Sugammadex on Healthcare Costs and Effectiveness of Recovery in Patients Following Anterior Cervical Spine Discectomy.","authors":"Hung-Te Hsu, Szu-Yu Chen, Yu-Kai Huang, Kuang-I Cheng, Shih-Feng Weng, Zhi-Fu Wu","doi":"10.3390/jpm15030087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is an effective surgical procedure used to treat degenerative cervical spine disease. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a new and promising paradigm for ACSS. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of neuromuscular monitoring with sugammadex in the ERAS protocol, which had not been confirmed in ACSS. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective study, the electronic medical records of patients aged 20 to 80 years who had undergone first-time ACSS performed in the period from 1 December 2018 to 31 December 2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided into ERAS and non-ERAS groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance differences between the groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20, including independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, linear regression, and logistic regression. <b>Results</b>: A total of 394 patients were included in this study: 163 in the non-ERAS group and 231 in the ERAS group. In the ERAS group, significant reductions were observed in several key outcomes compared with the non-ERAS group: LOS was reduced by 0.62 days (<i>p</i> < 0.001), hospital costs were lowered by NTD 13,174.40 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), ventilator time was decreased by 149.40 min (<i>p</i> < 0.001), time to first oral intake was shortened by 4.71 h (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and time to first ambulation was reduced by 8.00 h (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in complication rates were observed between the two groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: The ACSS-tailored ERAS pathway with NMM and sugammadex can reduce LOS, cost, and speed of patient recovery without increasing complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is an effective surgical procedure used to treat degenerative cervical spine disease. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a new and promising paradigm for ACSS. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of neuromuscular monitoring with sugammadex in the ERAS protocol, which had not been confirmed in ACSS. Methods: In this retrospective study, the electronic medical records of patients aged 20 to 80 years who had undergone first-time ACSS performed in the period from 1 December 2018 to 31 December 2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided into ERAS and non-ERAS groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance differences between the groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20, including independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, linear regression, and logistic regression. Results: A total of 394 patients were included in this study: 163 in the non-ERAS group and 231 in the ERAS group. In the ERAS group, significant reductions were observed in several key outcomes compared with the non-ERAS group: LOS was reduced by 0.62 days (p < 0.001), hospital costs were lowered by NTD 13,174.40 (p < 0.001), ventilator time was decreased by 149.40 min (p < 0.001), time to first oral intake was shortened by 4.71 h (p < 0.001), and time to first ambulation was reduced by 8.00 h (p < 0.001). No significant differences in complication rates were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: The ACSS-tailored ERAS pathway with NMM and sugammadex can reduce LOS, cost, and speed of patient recovery without increasing complications.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.