Uveitis output in high-impact clinical ophthalmology journals: a bibliometric analysis.

IF 2.3 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Baotram V Nguyen, Priyanka Bhatnagar, Daniel C Lee, Meghan K Berkenstock
{"title":"Uveitis output in high-impact clinical ophthalmology journals: a bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Baotram V Nguyen, Priyanka Bhatnagar, Daniel C Lee, Meghan K Berkenstock","doi":"10.1186/s12348-025-00490-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite uveitis subspecialty workforce shortages, uveitis specialists remain engaged in research. This study examines the relationship between the proportions of uveitis-focused articles in high-impact ophthalmology journals and fellowship-trained uveitis specialists on their editorial boards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis was conducted on articles published from 2014 to 2023 in the five highest-impact ophthalmology journals: Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO), American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO), and Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS). Editorial board members with uveitis or ocular immunology fellowships were identified from public domain sources. Articles were screened using uveitis MeSH terms. Data analysis was performed using STATA to assess the relationship between the proportions of uveitis-focused articles and uveitis-trained editors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2014 to 2023, 3.57% (575/16,093) of articles published in the five journals were uveitis-focused. The proportion of uveitis-focused articles ranged from 1.74% in IOVS to 5.89% in AJO. On average, fellowship-trained uveitis specialists comprised 5.28% of editorial board members annually. There were positive correlations between the proportions of uveitis-focused articles and uveitis-trained editors annually (r = 0.6799, p < 0.00005) and over the 10-year period (r = 0.2675, p < 0.00005). No significant correlation was observed within individual journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uveitis research remains underrepresented in high-impact ophthalmology journals despite research productivity in the field. While a positive correlation between uveitis-trained editors and uveitis-focused articles was found across all journals, this trend did not hold within individual journals. Enhancing uveitis research visibility in high-impact journals is essential to advancing clinical knowledge, improving patient outcomes, and inspiring ophthalmologists to enter this underserved subspecialty.</p>","PeriodicalId":16600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","volume":"15 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-025-00490-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite uveitis subspecialty workforce shortages, uveitis specialists remain engaged in research. This study examines the relationship between the proportions of uveitis-focused articles in high-impact ophthalmology journals and fellowship-trained uveitis specialists on their editorial boards.

Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on articles published from 2014 to 2023 in the five highest-impact ophthalmology journals: Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO), American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO), and Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS). Editorial board members with uveitis or ocular immunology fellowships were identified from public domain sources. Articles were screened using uveitis MeSH terms. Data analysis was performed using STATA to assess the relationship between the proportions of uveitis-focused articles and uveitis-trained editors.

Results: From 2014 to 2023, 3.57% (575/16,093) of articles published in the five journals were uveitis-focused. The proportion of uveitis-focused articles ranged from 1.74% in IOVS to 5.89% in AJO. On average, fellowship-trained uveitis specialists comprised 5.28% of editorial board members annually. There were positive correlations between the proportions of uveitis-focused articles and uveitis-trained editors annually (r = 0.6799, p < 0.00005) and over the 10-year period (r = 0.2675, p < 0.00005). No significant correlation was observed within individual journals.

Conclusions: Uveitis research remains underrepresented in high-impact ophthalmology journals despite research productivity in the field. While a positive correlation between uveitis-trained editors and uveitis-focused articles was found across all journals, this trend did not hold within individual journals. Enhancing uveitis research visibility in high-impact journals is essential to advancing clinical knowledge, improving patient outcomes, and inspiring ophthalmologists to enter this underserved subspecialty.

Abstract Image

高影响力临床眼科学期刊的葡萄膜炎产出:文献计量学分析。
背景:尽管葡萄膜炎亚专业劳动力短缺,葡萄膜炎专家仍然从事研究。本研究考察了高影响力眼科期刊中以葡萄膜炎为重点的文章的比例与其编辑委员会中受过奖学金培训的葡萄膜炎专家之间的关系。方法:采用文献计量学方法对2014 - 2023年影响力最大的5种眼科期刊《ophthalmology》、《JAMA ophthalmology》、《British Journal of ophthalology》(BJO)、《American Journal of ophthalology》(AJO)和《Investigative ophthalmology and Visual Science》(IOVS)发表的文章进行分析。具有葡萄膜炎或眼免疫学奖学金的编辑委员会成员从公共领域来源确定。使用葡萄膜炎MeSH术语筛选文章。使用STATA进行数据分析,以评估以大学为重点的文章比例与大学培养的编辑之间的关系。结果:2014 - 2023年,5种期刊发表的文章中,以uveitis为主题的占3.57%(575/16,093)。以大学为重点的文章比例从IOVS的1.74%到AJO的5.89%不等。平均而言,每年接受奖学金培训的葡萄膜炎专家占编委会成员的5.28%。以葡萄膜炎为主题的文章的比例与每年葡萄膜炎培训的编辑的比例呈正相关(r = 0.6799, p)。结论:尽管该领域的研究效率很高,但葡萄膜炎研究在高影响力眼科期刊中的代表性仍然不足。虽然在所有期刊中都发现了受过大学教育的编辑和以大学为重点的文章之间的正相关关系,但这种趋势在个别期刊中并不成立。提高葡萄膜炎研究在高影响力期刊上的可见度对于提高临床知识、改善患者预后和激励眼科医生进入这一服务不足的亚专科至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信