Gender-Based Differences in Biomechanical Walking Patterns of Athletes Using Inertial Sensors.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Elina Gianzina, Christos K Yiannakopoulos, Georgios Kalinterakis, Spilios Delis, Efstathios Chronopoulos
{"title":"Gender-Based Differences in Biomechanical Walking Patterns of Athletes Using Inertial Sensors.","authors":"Elina Gianzina, Christos K Yiannakopoulos, Georgios Kalinterakis, Spilios Delis, Efstathios Chronopoulos","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10010082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Wearable inertial sensors are essential tools in biomechanics and sports science for assessing gait in real-world conditions. This study explored gender-based differences in biomechanical walking patterns among healthy Greek athletes using the BTS G-Walk system, focusing on key gait parameters to inform gender-specific training and rehabilitation strategies. <b>Methods</b>: Ninety-five healthy athletes (55 men, 40 women), aged 18 to 30 years, participated in this study. Each athlete performed a standardized 14 m walk while 17 biomechanical gait parameters were recorded using the BTS G-Walk inertial sensor. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS to assess gender differences and left-right foot symmetry. <b>Results</b>: No significant asymmetry was found between the left and right feet for most gait parameters. Men exhibited longer stride lengths (left: <i>p</i> = 0.005, Cohen's d = 0.61; right: <i>p</i> = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.53) and longer stride and gait cycle durations (left: <i>p</i> = 0.025, Cohen's d = 0.52; right: <i>p</i> = 0.025, Cohen's d = 0.53). Women showed a higher cadence (<i>p</i> = 0.022, Cohen's d = -0.52) and greater propulsion index (left: <i>p</i> = 0.001, Cohen's d = -0.71; right: <i>p</i> = 0.001, Cohen's d = -0.73), as well as a higher percentage of first double support (<i>p</i> = 0.030, Cohen's d = -0.44). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings highlight the impact of biological and biomechanical differences on walking patterns, emphasizing the need for gender-specific training and rehabilitation. The BTS G-Walk system proved reliable for gait analysis, with potential for optimizing performance, injury prevention, and rehabilitation in athletes. Future research should explore larger, more diverse populations with multi-sensor setups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10010082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wearable inertial sensors are essential tools in biomechanics and sports science for assessing gait in real-world conditions. This study explored gender-based differences in biomechanical walking patterns among healthy Greek athletes using the BTS G-Walk system, focusing on key gait parameters to inform gender-specific training and rehabilitation strategies. Methods: Ninety-five healthy athletes (55 men, 40 women), aged 18 to 30 years, participated in this study. Each athlete performed a standardized 14 m walk while 17 biomechanical gait parameters were recorded using the BTS G-Walk inertial sensor. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS to assess gender differences and left-right foot symmetry. Results: No significant asymmetry was found between the left and right feet for most gait parameters. Men exhibited longer stride lengths (left: p = 0.005, Cohen's d = 0.61; right: p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.53) and longer stride and gait cycle durations (left: p = 0.025, Cohen's d = 0.52; right: p = 0.025, Cohen's d = 0.53). Women showed a higher cadence (p = 0.022, Cohen's d = -0.52) and greater propulsion index (left: p = 0.001, Cohen's d = -0.71; right: p = 0.001, Cohen's d = -0.73), as well as a higher percentage of first double support (p = 0.030, Cohen's d = -0.44). Conclusions: These findings highlight the impact of biological and biomechanical differences on walking patterns, emphasizing the need for gender-specific training and rehabilitation. The BTS G-Walk system proved reliable for gait analysis, with potential for optimizing performance, injury prevention, and rehabilitation in athletes. Future research should explore larger, more diverse populations with multi-sensor setups.

使用惯性传感器的运动员生物力学步行方式的性别差异。
背景:可穿戴惯性传感器是生物力学和运动科学中评估真实世界条件下步态的重要工具。本研究使用BTS G-Walk系统探讨了健康希腊运动员生物力学步行模式的性别差异,重点关注关键步态参数,为性别特异性训练和康复策略提供信息。方法:95名18 ~ 30岁的健康运动员(男55名,女40名)参加本研究。每位运动员进行标准化的14米步行,同时使用BTS G-Walk惯性传感器记录17个生物力学步态参数。使用SPSS进行统计分析,评估性别差异和左右足对称性。结果:大多数步态参数在左右足之间没有发现明显的不对称。男性表现出更长的步幅(左:p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 0.61;右:p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.53),更长的步幅和步态周期持续时间(左:p = 0.025, Cohen’s d = 0.52;右:p = 0.025, Cohen’s d = 0.53)。女性表现出更高的节奏(p = 0.022, Cohen’s d = -0.52)和更大的推进指数(左:p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = -0.71;右:p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = -0.73),以及更高百分比的第一次双重支持(p = 0.030, Cohen’s d = -0.44)。结论:这些发现突出了生物学和生物力学差异对步行模式的影响,强调了针对性别的训练和康复的必要性。BTS G-Walk系统被证明是可靠的步态分析,具有优化运动员表现、损伤预防和康复的潜力。未来的研究应该探索更大,更多样化的人群与多传感器设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信